Literature DB >> 36104522

Characterisation of macular neovascularisation subtypes in age-related macular degeneration to optimise treatment outcomes.

Thibaud Mathis1,2, Frank G Holz3, Sobha Sivaprasad4, Young Hee Yoon5, Nicole Eter6, Lee-Jen Chen7, Adrian Koh8, Eduardo Cunha de Souza9, Giovanni Staurenghi10.   

Abstract

The aim of this review is to identify the common characteristics and prognoses of different subtypes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). We also propose recommendations on how to tailor treatments to the subtype of neovessels to optimise patient outcomes. The authors, selected members of the Vision Academy, met to discuss treatment outcomes in nAMD according to macular neovascularisation (MNV) subtypes, using evidence from a literature search conducted on the PubMed database (cut-off date: March 2019). This review article summarises the recommendations of the Vision Academy on how the characterisation of MNV subtypes can optimise treatment outcomes in nAMD. The identification of MNV subtypes has been facilitated by the advent of multimodal imaging. Findings from fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography collectively help refine and standardise the determination of the MNV subtype. To date, three subtypes have been described in the literature and have specific characteristics, as identified by imaging. Type 1 MNV is associated with better long-term outcomes but usually requires more intense anti-vascular endothelial growth factor dosing. Type 2 MNV typically responds quickly to treatment but is more prone to the development of fibrotic scars, which may be associated with poorer outcomes. Type 3 MNV tends to be highly sensitive to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment but may be associated with a higher incidence of outer retinal atrophy, compared with other subtypes. Accurately assessing the MNV subtype provides information on prognosis and helps to optimise the management of patients with nAMD.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36104522     DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02231-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   4.456


  50 in total

1.  Incidence of legal blindness from age-related macular degeneration in denmark: year 2000 to 2010.

Authors:  Sara Brandi Bloch; Michael Larsen; Inger Christine Munch
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Do we need a new classification for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration?

Authors:  K Bailey Freund; Sandrine A Zweifel; Michael Engelbert
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Comparison of exudative age-related macular degeneration subtypes in Japanese and French Patients: multicenter diagnosis with multimodal imaging.

Authors:  Gabriel Coscas; Kenji Yamashiro; Florence Coscas; Umberto De Benedetto; Akitaka Tsujikawa; Masahiro Miyake; Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung; Tien Yin Wong; Nagahisa Yoshimura
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Natural history of predominantly classic, minimally classic, and occult subgroups in exudative age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Ankoor R Shah; Lucian V Del Priore
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 5.  Trends in Real-World Neovascular AMD Treatment Outcomes in the UK.

Authors:  Hemal Mehta; Leah N Kim; Thibaud Mathis; Pardis Zalmay; Faruque Ghanchi; Winfried M Amoaku; Laurent Kodjikian
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-14

6.  Clinicopathologic correlations of surgically excised type 1 and type 2 submacular choroidal neovascular membranes.

Authors:  H E Grossniklaus; J D Gass
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Ranibizumab versus Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration: Results from the GEFAL Noninferiority Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Laurent Kodjikian; Eric H Souied; Gérard Mimoun; Martine Mauget-Faÿsse; Francine Behar-Cohen; Evelyne Decullier; Laure Huot; Gilles Aulagner
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  The epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Ronald Klein; Tunde Peto; Alan Bird; Mylan R Vannewkirk
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Biomicroscopic and histopathologic considerations regarding the feasibility of surgical excision of subfoveal neovascular membranes.

Authors:  J D Gass
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1994

10.  Consensus Nomenclature for Reporting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Data: Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature Study Group.

Authors:  Richard F Spaide; Glenn J Jaffe; David Sarraf; K Bailey Freund; Srinivas R Sadda; Giovanni Staurenghi; Nadia K Waheed; Usha Chakravarthy; Philip J Rosenfeld; Frank G Holz; Eric H Souied; Salomon Y Cohen; Giuseppe Querques; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; David Boyer; Alain Gaudric; Barbara Blodi; Caroline R Baumal; Xiaoxin Li; Gabriel J Coscas; Alexander Brucker; Lawrence Singerman; Phil Luthert; Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth; Hans E Grossniklaus; David J Wilson; Robyn Guymer; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; Emily Y Chew; Karl Csaky; Jordi M Monés; Daniel Pauleikhoff; Ramin Tadayoni; James Fujimoto
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 12.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.