PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend somatic and germline testing for men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Barriers to widespread implementation result in underutilization of germline testing. Somatic testing alone risks missing pathogenic germline variants (PGVs). We sought to determine whether the addition of germline testing to tumor-only sequencing improves detection of PGVs in men with advanced PCa. Secondarily, we sought to define the added value of combining somatic and germline testing to optimize detection of clinically actionable alterations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed results of independent germline testing and tumor-only sequencing from 100 men with advanced PCa from a prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03328091). The primary outcome was the proportion of PGVs not reported with tumor-only sequencing. The secondary outcome was the association of locus-specific loss of heterozygosity for PGVs in homologous recombination genes with clinical-genomic features. RESULTS: In the 100 men who underwent germline testing and tumor-only sequencing, 24 PGVs were identified, 17 of which were clinically actionable, in 23 patients. Tumor-only sequencing failed to report four (17%) of the PGVs. One additional PGV (4.2%) had variant allele frequency on tumor-sequencing below the threshold for follow-up germline testing. When integrating tumor-only sequencing with germling testing results, 33% of patients harbored clinically actionable alterations. Rates of locus-specific loss of heterozygosity were higher for BRCA2 PGVs in castration-resistant PCa than PGVs in other homologous recombination genes in hormone-sensitive PCa (P = .029). CONCLUSION: Tumor-only sequencing failed to report more than 20% of PGVs in men with advanced PCa. These findings strongly support guideline recommendations for universal germline and somatic testing in this population. Combining tumor and germline sequencing doubled the chance of detecting a clinically actionable alteration.
PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend somatic and germline testing for men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Barriers to widespread implementation result in underutilization of germline testing. Somatic testing alone risks missing pathogenic germline variants (PGVs). We sought to determine whether the addition of germline testing to tumor-only sequencing improves detection of PGVs in men with advanced PCa. Secondarily, we sought to define the added value of combining somatic and germline testing to optimize detection of clinically actionable alterations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed results of independent germline testing and tumor-only sequencing from 100 men with advanced PCa from a prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03328091). The primary outcome was the proportion of PGVs not reported with tumor-only sequencing. The secondary outcome was the association of locus-specific loss of heterozygosity for PGVs in homologous recombination genes with clinical-genomic features. RESULTS: In the 100 men who underwent germline testing and tumor-only sequencing, 24 PGVs were identified, 17 of which were clinically actionable, in 23 patients. Tumor-only sequencing failed to report four (17%) of the PGVs. One additional PGV (4.2%) had variant allele frequency on tumor-sequencing below the threshold for follow-up germline testing. When integrating tumor-only sequencing with germling testing results, 33% of patients harbored clinically actionable alterations. Rates of locus-specific loss of heterozygosity were higher for BRCA2 PGVs in castration-resistant PCa than PGVs in other homologous recombination genes in hormone-sensitive PCa (P = .029). CONCLUSION: Tumor-only sequencing failed to report more than 20% of PGVs in men with advanced PCa. These findings strongly support guideline recommendations for universal germline and somatic testing in this population. Combining tumor and germline sequencing doubled the chance of detecting a clinically actionable alteration.
Authors: Elena Castro; Nuria Romero-Laorden; Angela Del Pozo; Rebeca Lozano; Ana Medina; Javier Puente; Josep Maria Piulats; David Lorente; Maria Isabel Saez; Rafael Morales-Barrera; Enrique Gonzalez-Billalabeitia; Ylenia Cendón; Iciar García-Carbonero; Pablo Borrega; M José Mendez Vidal; Alvaro Montesa; Paz Nombela; Eva Fernández-Parra; Aránzazu Gonzalez Del Alba; José Carlos Villa-Guzmán; Kristina Ibáñez; Alejo Rodriguez-Vida; Lorena Magraner-Pardo; Begoña Perez-Valderrama; Elena Vallespín; Enrique Gallardo; Sergio Vazquez; Colin C Pritchard; Pablo Lapunzina; David Olmos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brittany M Szymaniak; Lauren A Facchini; Veda N Giri; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Tomasz M Beer; Maria I Carlo; Daniel C Danila; Mallika Dhawan; Daniel George; Julie N Graff; Shilpa Gupta; Elisabeth Heath; Celestia S Higano; Glenn Liu; Ana M Molina; Channing J Paller; Akash Patnaik; Daniel P Petrylak; Zachery Reichert; Matthew B Rettig; Charles J Ryan; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Jake Vinson; Young E Whang; Alicia K Morgans; Heather H Cheng; Rana R McKay Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-09-28
Authors: Piper Nicolosi; Elisa Ledet; Shan Yang; Scott Michalski; Brandy Freschi; Erin O'Leary; Edward D Esplin; Robert L Nussbaum; Oliver Sartor Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Jacob E Berchuck; Zhenwei Zhang; Rebecca Silver; Lucia Kwak; Wanling Xie; Gwo-Shu Mary Lee; Matthew L Freedman; Adam S Kibel; Eliezer M Van Allen; Rana R McKay; Mary-Ellen Taplin Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Wassim Abida; Joanna Cyrta; Glenn Heller; Davide Prandi; Joshua Armenia; Ilsa Coleman; Marcin Cieslik; Matteo Benelli; Dan Robinson; Eliezer M Van Allen; Andrea Sboner; Tarcisio Fedrizzi; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Brian D Robinson; Navonil De Sarkar; Lakshmi P Kunju; Scott Tomlins; Yi Mi Wu; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Massimo Loda; Anuradha Gopalan; Victor E Reuter; Colin C Pritchard; Joaquin Mateo; Diletta Bianchini; Susana Miranda; Suzanne Carreira; Pasquale Rescigno; Julie Filipenko; Jacob Vinson; Robert B Montgomery; Himisha Beltran; Elisabeth I Heath; Howard I Scher; Philip W Kantoff; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Nikolaus Schultz; Johann S deBono; Francesca Demichelis; Peter S Nelson; Mark A Rubin; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nicole Weise; Justin Shaya; Juan Javier-Desloges; Heather H Cheng; Lisa Madlensky; Rana R McKay Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 5.455
Authors: P Terraf; F Pareja; D N Brown; O Ceyhan-Birsoy; M Misyura; S Rana; E O'Reilly; M I Carlo; C Aghajanian; Y Liu; F Derakhshan; G Jayakumaran; B Weigelt; M Walsh; Z Stadler; K Offit; M Ladanyi; M Robson; A Zehir; J S Reis-Filho; D Mandelker Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 51.769
Authors: Suzanne Carreira; Nuria Porta; Sara Arce-Gallego; George Seed; Alba Llop-Guevara; Diletta Bianchini; Pasquale Rescigno; Alec Paschalis; Claudia Bertan; Chloe Baker; Jane Goodall; Susana Miranda; Ruth Riisnaes; Ines Figueiredo; Ana Ferreira; Rita Pereira; Mateus Crespo; Bora Gurel; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Stephen J Pettitt; Wei Yuan; Violeta Serra; Jan Rekowski; Christopher J Lord; Emma Hall; Joaquin Mateo; Johann S de Bono Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 39.397