Weaning period and growth patterns of captive Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cubs.

This study tracked and recorded the weight changes of 13 captive Sunda pangolin cubs from lactation to maturity to explored the appropriate weaning time and reveal the rules of its weight growth. SPSS 25.0 was used to build a cubic equation model to fit the body weight change rules of 4 individuals who nonvoluntarily ingested artificial feed (NIAF) at 127 days after birth and 5 individuals who voluntarily ingested artificial feed (VIAF) at 86-108 days after birth. The body weight of NIAF cubs aged 0-120 days and VIAF cubs aged 0-150 days were estimated according to the fitting model. An independent sample T-test was performed on the mean body weight of the two groups during the late lactation period. The results showed that at 105 days after birth, the body weight of the VIAF group was significantly higher than that of the NIAF group (P = 0.049), and the body weight of the VIAF group was extremely significantly higher than that of the NIAF group at 114 days (P = 0.008); The peak cumulative body weight of the NIAF cubs during lactation appeared around 130 days of age (n = 3); The mortality rate was 66.7% (n = 3) after about 150 days if the feed was continuously consumed nonvoluntarily. It was concluded that the milk secretion period of the mother is about 0-5 months after giving birth; the weaning period of the cubs should be 4-5 months after birth. If the cubs don't follow the mother to eat artificial feed for 3 months after birth, it can start be induced with artificial diet which adds termites, and the time point cannot be later than 130 days, otherwise it is not conducive to the survival of the cubs; When sexually mature, the body length and body weight of female cubs account for about 84% and 60% of the adult, respectively; the body maturity and body weight of female cubs tend to be stable about 15.3 months and 16.4 months, respectively. Finally, a special needle-shaped nipples and nursing patterns of female Sunda pangolins were also recorded in this study. These findings play an important role in guiding the nursing of captive Sunda pangolin cubs and other pangolin cubs. It is expected to improve the survival rate of the cubs by exploring the appropriate weaning time and the rules of weight growth. By scientifically planning the reproductive cycle of the female Sunda pangolins, our goal is to expand the population size and eventually release to the wild, meanwhile improving knowledge of this critically endangered species.

Introduction

The Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) is one of the eight known pangolins of the Order Pholidota, Family Manidae [1]. Sunda pangolins were mainly distributed in the Indochina Peninsula, Malay Peninsula, Indonesia and southern Yunnan of China [2, 3]. In recent decades, the number of wild Sunda pangolins has sharply declined due to overexploitation and destruction of natural habitats [3]. Based on this situation, in 2014 the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) upgraded the Sunda pangolin from Endangered to Critically Endangered on the Red List of Threatened Species [4]. In October 2016, the contracting parties passed a resolution to upgrade all the eight pangolin species from Appendix II to Appendix I at the 17th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) [5]. As a result, international commercial trade of pangolins has been completely banned since January 2, 2017 [5].

Captive breeding of endangered species is one of the important approaches to prevent the extinction. It is extremely difficult to collect data on Sunda pangolins in the wild because of their scarcity and nocturnal habits, and it is also difficult to breed them in captivity [6, 7]. In October 2021, we published a paper on the successful breeding of Malayan pangolin for three generations, prior to this, there were no reports of systematic breeding of Malayan pangolins in the second generation [8]. As a result, the biological and ecological data of this species, especially the reproduction data, are extremely limited [9, 10], data on growth and development, as well as nursing behavior, are also very rare. More information is still required to reveal the natural attributes of this species. Weaning time has a great influence on the growth and mortality of mammals [11]. Studies have shown that early weaning has a negative impact on growth. Therefore, timely weaning can effectively improve the survival rate and yield of animals [12]. In addition, weaning time can affect the diversity and composition of fecal microbiota. Massacci et al. (2020) said that later weaning increases the diversity of the gut microbiome, giving the pups a competitive advantage [13]. Moreover, weaning influences the immunity of the cubs. Studies have shown that weaning affects antibody responses to antigens given two weeks before weaning [14]. Therefore, determining the weaning period of Sunda pangolin is of great significance to the growth and development of young, improving survival rate and reducing mortality.

To figure out the key parameters of rearing cubs, in this study, the mass changes of captive Sunda pangolin cubs during lactation were statistically measured regularly, and a cubic equation model was constructed using SPSS25.0 to predict lactation and weaning periods. The female’s growth rate was also monitored to reveal the biological characteristics of the species. This study aims to provide important reference for the protective captive breeding of critically endangered Sunda pangolin and the rescue of orphaned pangolins.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Biology Ethics Committee of the Guangxi Forestry Research Institute (reference number: GFRIIACUC2016-001). The study was carried out in compliance with the guiding principles on the treatment of laboratory animals issued by the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Laboratory Animal Guideline for Ethical Review of Animal Welfare issued by the National Standard of the People’s Republic of China and ARRIVE guidelines.

Experimental animals

The experimental animals in this study were 13 descendants of Sunda pangolin born in the Rescue Center of Guangxi Forestry Research Institute from April 2016 to October 2019 (Table 1).

Table 1

Basic information of the 13 Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) offspring and their mothers (recorded until October 31, 2019).

Offspring ID	Mother ID	Date mother received	Place of conception	Date of birth	Status	Survival time (days)
C1	F81	2015.12.15	Wild	2016.04.29	Died on 2016.09.30	154
C2	F121	2016.01.19	Wild	2016.05.01	Alive	1278
C3	F11	2016.01.19	Wild	2016.06.05	Alive	1243
C4	F3	2014.01.10	Center	2016.06.25	Died on 2018.06.08	713
C5	F161	2016.04.16	Wild	2016.07.04	Died on 2019.05.24	1054
C6	F15	2016.04.16	Wild	2016.08.22	Alive	1165
C7	F6	2015.09.04	Center	2016.10.18	Died on 2018.07.07	627
C8	F82	2015.12.15	Center	2017.04.15	Died on 2017.09.18	156
C10	F5	2015.09.04	Center	2017.05.27	Alive	887
C11	F162	2016.04.16	Center	2017.07.14	Alive	839
C15	F83	2015.12.15	Center	2018.03.31	Alive	579
C16	F122	2016.01.19	Center	2018.05.19	Alive	530
CC4	C3	2016.06.05	Center	2018.06.06	Alive	512

1-3represent the order in which the offspring from each female were born.

C represents first-generation offspring, CC represents second-generation offspring, and F represents wild female generation.

Housing and nursing

Each female pangolin lived in a separate cage with the suckling offspring, and there was a surveillance camera above the activity area to monitor the nursing behavior. Both females and cubs were fed with the same artificial diet, which consisted of black ant powder, silkworm pupa powder, mealworm powder, soy protein powder, termite mound mud and a small amount of vitamin complex. The ingredients were mixed with water until a semi-fluid concentration is reached. Pangolins were fed 250–400 mL of food once a day between 17:00–20:00. Clean water (100–200 mL) was also provided with a separate bowl. Termites were added when the cubs refused to eat the artificial diet.

The captive conditions, methods, part of the pangolin’s behavior and pregnancy period of the Sunda pangolins in the rescue center have been previously described [8, 15, 16].

Data collection

The cubs were weighed for the first time within 1–15 days after birth, and then all cubs were weighed around the 10th, 20th, and 30th of each month. For individuals C4, C6, C7, C10, CC4, C15 and C16, we continued to record their mass and length after successful weaning until maturity.

Estimated lactation period and weaning period

Individuals C4, C5, C7, C10, and C11 began to eat artificial diets autonomously at 86–108 days of age. We classified them as the VIAF group. C1, C2, and C8 had inflection points in weight gain at 133, 131, and 127 days after birth, respectively, due to their inability to take artificial food on their own, and C3 started eating at 127 days. We classified these four cubs as the NIAF group. If the cubs continue to rely exclusively on maternal milk, body weight will continue to drop after reaching the peak, indicating that maternal milk supply is insufficient to maintain the growth of cubs, or that lactation has stopped completely. Combined with the videos of nursing behaviors in the late lactation period, we were able to estimate the weaning and lactation periods.

Signs of sexual and physical maturity

Since female Sunda pangolins do not have obvious estrus characteristics at sexual maturity [8], we facilitated their cohabitation with males at random times. The first conception of a particular female was regarded as sexual maturity for that female. Body was considered mature when body length (± 1 cm) and body weight (± 0.5 kg) gradually stabilize. We defined body length as the length from the tip of the nose to the tip of the tail when the pangolin stretches its body. We tracked and recorded the body length and body weight of C4, C6, C7, C10, CC4, C15, and C16 until sexual and physical maturity.

Data analysis

Eleven models, including logistic, quadratic, and cubic equations, were constructed using SPSS 25.0 to fit changes in cubs’ body weight. The best-fit model was selected to estimate the daily body weight of each cub and to estimate the point at which a significant difference between the VIAF group and the NIAF group began to appear.

The measured values used to estimate the mass of C1, C2 and C8 ranged from birth to the peak cumulative weight, and C3 ranged from birth to 127 days of age. The measured values of the VIAF group ranged from birth to 150 days of age. Models were fitted to the two groups as well as to each cub individually, and independent samples t-test was performed on the estimated daily mass from birth to 150 days of age.

Results

Mass changes and weaning of Sunda pangolin cubs

C1 showed peak cumulative mass on day 133 after birth (weight 1025 g), while C2 showed peak cumulative mass at 131 days of age (1210 g) (Fig 1 and S1 Table). Due to possible reasons such as reduced milk and involuntary intake of artificial food, the mass of the two cubs dropped by 50 g and 20 g respectively 10 days after the peak. C1 died 21 days after the peak mass was reached (154 days of age, 875 g) (Fig 1). C2 began to eat a small amount of food at 150 days of age but continued to lose mass. By 161 days of age, C2’ mass dropped to its lowest post-peak level of 1085 g but rebounded rapidly during the next ten days (Fig 1). There was no mass loss before C3 started to eat artificial food at the age of 127 days (Fig 1). C8 reached a peak body weight at 127 days of age (1070g) (Fig 1 and S1 Table). At the age of 140 days, we started coaxing the cubs to eat the artificial diet baited with termites, but it failed, and C8 died at 865g at 156 days after birth.

Fig 1

Cumulative body mass growth curves for nine Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cubs from birth to 200 days of age.

The peak mass of C1, C2, and C8 appeared at 133, 131, and 127 days of age, respectively. Afterwards, there was a brief drop in body mass, indicating that the female’s milk supply was insufficient or even stopped secreting milk in the late lactation period. With the exception of C4 being forced to separate from its mother and losing weight, the VIAF group (including C3 who started to eat the artificial diet at 127 days of age) did not experience sustained weight loss. Therefore, we speculate that the theoretical weaning period of Sunda pangolin cubs is about 4–5 months after birth.

Monitoring video showed that the six-month-old male cub C5 was still suckling in the late lactation period (Fig 2A). Based on this, it is inferred that the lactation period of Sunda pangolins may last for 5–6 months.

Fig 2

(a) The male Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cub C5 (mass 2640 g, body straight dorsal length 66 cm) was still suckling at 6 months of age. (Photo: Dingyu Yan, 28 December 2016). (b) At 10 months of age, female Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cub C10 (mass 4220 g, body straight dorsal length 80 cm) was still sharing her mother’s denning box. (Photo: Dingyu Yan, 15 March 2018). (c) Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) mother F3 was scratched by her 145-day-old male offspring while she was nursing him. (Photo: Dingyu Yan, 6 November 2016). (d) 7-month-old male Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cub C11 (mass 3330 g, body straight dorsal length 73 cm) was scratched by his mother while cohabiting (Photo: Dingyu Yan, 11 February 2018). (e) Needle-like single main duct nipple of a female Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) that has been partially retracted just after lactation. (Photo: Dingyu Yan, 21 May 2017). (f) Needle-shaped nipples of a female Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) retracted about 15 seconds after the cub stopped suckling. (Photo: Dingyu Yan, 21 May 2017).

Estimated mass of Sunda pangolin cubs during lactation period

Mass estimation for the NIAF group (C1, C2, C3, C8)

The results showed that the cubic equation model best fit the growth rates of the NIAF group, and its fit (R2) ranks first among the 11 models, with an R2 of 0.952 (Fig 3A). The equation is y = 136.47+9.79x-0.00463x2-0.00009865x3, and the body mass fitting values of different ages are shown in S2 Table.

Fig 3

(a) Body mass as a function of age for four Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cubs under a natural feeding regime. (b) Body mass as a function of age for five Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cubs fed an artificial diet.

Mass estimation for the VIAF group (C4, C5, C7, C10, C11)

Like the NIAF group, the cubic equation is the model with the best fit for VIAF group with an R2 of 0.973 (Fig 3B). The equation is y = 124.16+9.553x-0.039402x2+0.00039x3, and the body mass fitting values of different ages are shown in S2 Table.

Mass difference estimate between the two groups

The fitted body mass curves and R2 value of each cub are shown in Fig 4. The regression equation for the growth curve of each cub is shown in S3 Table. There was a significant difference in body mass between the two groups at 105 days of age (P = 0.049), while extremely significant differences began to appear at 114 days of age (P = 0.008).

Fig 4

Fitted body mass growth curves for each of the nine Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cubs.

Estimating the mass and length of female Sunda pangolins at sexual and physical maturity

Female Sunda pangolins have an average body weight of 3255 g when sexually mature, and the average body straight dorsal length was 72 cm (n = 4) at 7–9 months. At 15.3 months old, the average body length of female stabilized at 86cm (n = 4), indicating physical maturity. At 16.4 months old, the average body weight stabilized at 5385 g (n = 7), indicating physical maturity (S4 Table). One of the growth information was shown in Fig 5. The body weight at sexual maturity accounts for about 60% of the body weight physical maturity, and the body length at sexual maturity accounts for about 84% of the body length at physical maturity.

Fig 5

The growth process of the first-generation offspring C7. (Photos: Dingyu Yan).

Characteristic of nursing behavior

Almost all the nursing behaviors were recorded by cameras in the activity area. Through monitoring, we found some nursing behaviors:

Their mother would not expel or harm the cubs if they had not been separated since birth

Although two dens were provided in each enclosure, mothers and cubs usually chose to live together. Even if cubs such as C3 and C4 gradually grew sharp claws to scratch their mothers, they did not get hurt. Male cub C5 is still suckling at nearly 6 months old, and female cub C10 is still sleeping in the same den with its mother at 10 months old (Fig 2A and 2B).

In some cases, the mother may also harm the suckling cub

145-day-old C4 was forced to separate from its mother (F3) for two days because it scratched the skin around the mother’s teat (Fig 2C). However, as C4 refused to eat when it was removed, we returned him to its mother. The next day, we found scratches on C4’s abdomen from F3. Another example is that female F16 left the den to mate with a male, then returned to the den after a while and scratched her cub C11 (Fig 2D).

There are no obvious signs of weaning between mother and cubs

145-day-old C4 had developed hard, sharp nails and was eager to scratch its mother’s breasts when its appetite was not satisfied, then we separated C4 from its mother to protect the mother, which may be due to decreased or stopped milk secretion. The other cubs were separated from their mothers 180–363 days after birth. There were no obvious signs of weaning between mother and cubs, unless successfully weaned cubs were no longer dependent on mother’s milk and could eat artificial food on their own. For example, the mother does not drive or harm the cub, and the cub usually lies on the mother’s back or tail when entering or exiting the den.

Special needle-shaped nipples

Female Sunda pangolins’ nipples are needle-like and normally retracted, extending only when sucking or releasing by itself (Fig 2C, 2E and 2F). There were no significant changes in breast size or shape before mating, after conception or during lactation.

An interesting feeding

A mother pangolin uses her tongue deliver artificial diet under the scales for its cub to lick (S1 File). As a result, the cub gradually accepted and was able to eat artificial diet on its own.

Discussion

The estimated mass of the VIAF group and the NIAF group began to show a significant difference at 105 days, and an extremely significant difference appeared at 114 days. The peak mass of the three cubs in the NIAF group appeared at about 130 days of age, and two of these cubs died within 160 days after birth due to their inability to switch from mother’s milk to artificial diet. Based on these results, the female’s milk production appears to have dropped to a level that cannot sustain the growth of cubs by about 130 days postpartum. We believe that milk production and energy and nutrients intake may be reduced at this stage, which is not sufficient to support the survival of the cubs. Therefore, after reaching the peak weight, the weight will gradually decrease, until the body condition becomes weak, sick, and eventually leads to death. After a mother breastfed her pups for an extended period (late lactation period), it is difficult for milk to meet the nutritional needs of the cubs, and artificial feed needs to be supplemented. A study in rabbits showed that a group of pups that were exclusively breastfed developed iron-deficiency anemia, whereas a group of pups that ate an iron-supplemented diet had lower rates of iron-deficiency anemia [17]. Longer lactation periods also increase disease susceptibility, as they show lower numbers of total lymphocytes at the end of lactation [18]. In addition, a longer lactation period consumes maternal energy for a long time, which is also one of the reasons for reducing maternal immunity [19, 20]. Therefore, we recommend that cubs start be induced with artificial diet at 90 days old and transition to artificial diet before 130 days old, preferably not later than 130 days old.

In this study, the mothers were only fed an artificial feed. However, Sunda pangolins naturally eat termites and small amounts of other species of ants. This feeding habit is engraved in the genetic memory of the young. Furthermore, artificial food is completely different from termites in terms of smell and taste, and most of the cubs cannot naturally follow their mothers to learn how to eat the artificial food, which may have affected the weaning time of the cubs.

Weaning is an important part of the pangolin’s life cycle and is related to survival rate. Termites are key to helping cubs transition to artificial formula–we have successfully weaned multiple cubs including C2 and C3 by using termites to coaxing cubs into eating an artificial diet. For cubs, creep feeding during pre-weaning lactation is a common husbandry practice because it increases weaning weight of cubs and leads to a smooth transition period from milk to the artificial feed for cubs [21, 22]. Previous studies demonstrated that creep feed intake has a positive effect on post-weaning feed intake [21, 23]. At the same time, this promotes gut development and therefore helps them cope with dietary changes more easily after weaning [24]. But at present, the feeding effect of artificial feed induction is not ideal. The feed we give to captive pangolins consists of about 30–40% black ants. The synthetic feed mixed with silkworm chrysalis, and others are different in smell and teste from natural edible termites. In fact, black ants may not be the main natural food for M. javanica, as most of the wild pangolins we just rescued ate termites instead of black ants during induction feeding.

Meanwhile, the cubs’ low acceptance of artificial feed made us to suspect that captive pangolins are weaning longer than wild pangolins. We speculate that wild Sunda pangolin cubs may start foraging earlier than those in captivity, so the mass of wild cubs of the same age during the mid-lactation period may be heavier than those in captivity. However, cubs raised in captivity during late lactation tend to gain mass faster in an environment with adequate food. No article has reported biological information about the growth of Sunda pangolins in the wild. Sun et al. (2018) observed that the overall growth rate of wild Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) cubs during lactation was 1.2 cm/week [25], which was faster than the growth rate of captive individuals (0.7 cm/week); [26].

Through behavioral observations, we observed a peculiar phenomenon of longer than normal breastfeeding. Monitoring video showed that the six-month-old male cub C5 was still suckling in the late lactation period. Research suggests that late lactation is thought to be more important for maintaining the mother-cub relationship than the true nutritional benefit to the pups [27, 28]. In other words, it is possible that the psychological effect of breastfeeding at this stage may be greater than the physiological effect.

We constructed the growth patterns of nine cubs based on recorded pup weight data, including the individual growth patterns of the nine pups, VIAF group and NIAF group. The cubic equation fitting model can best reflect the growth process of these individuals or groups. The fitting degrees of the nine individuals’ models are all above 0.995, and the fitting degrees of the 2 group models are all above 0.95. The fitting degree is above 0.95, indicating that the estimated value can better reflect the actual value, especially the individual model, with a fitting degree of 0.995. There was a significant difference in body weight between the VIAF group and the NIAF group at 105 days, and an extremely significant difference in body weight began to appear between the two groups at 114 days. These data provide a theoretical reference for us to determine the food induction time of young pangolin.

Payne and Francis (1998) speculate that the lactation period of Sunda pangolins was about 3 months [29], while Lim and Ng (2008) used radio tracking technology to study the mother-child relationship of wild Sunda pangolins and estimated the lactation period is about 3–4 months [30]. Zhang et al. (2015) estimated the weaning period to be about 4 months [31].

In these articles, the authors estimated the weaning period based on the behavior between mother and cub. In this study, weaning period was estimated to be 4–5 months according to the age of growth inflection point and death time of NIAF individuals, as well as the time of significant weight difference between NIAF group and VIAF group. According to our observation, we could not definitively judge the weaning period from the behavior of mother and cub. Our results rely primarily on detailed data on cub weight growth and the establishment of growth model projections, an innovative approach that theoretically explains the observations.

We observed that mothers do not expel or harm the cubs after weaning if they are not separated after birth. However, in some cases, the mother may also harm the cub. When we tried to separate two cubs from their mother for a few days and return them, we found that the mother was harming her cubs. This may be due to the cub is looking for the mother’s milk, but the mother doesn’t seem to recognize her baby and fights back, seeing it as an aggressive act. Challender et al. (2012) observed "wrestling" (repelling) behavior between a female Sunda pangolin and her 4-month-old cub [32]. The explanation for this is that in the late lactation, the young are no longer completely dependent on their mother’s milk, and they forage separately from each other. After reunion, the mother was disturbed by the cub’s attempts to get close to her, which leds to "wrestling" (repelling) behavior that harmed the cub. Common domestic animals can be weaned without conflict between the mother and the cubs. In most cases, the pups are forced to be weaned in isolation before natural weaning, that is, before the end of the mother’s lactation period. However, there have also been reports of female calves being prevented from sucking by their mothers during natural weaning, but not harmful behavior [33], while in wild animals, such as baboons, weaning conflicts in baboons can last for weeks or months, including daily competitive interactions and loud crying from babies [34]. The reduction in milk intake appears to be a matter of reduced milk availability rather than a reduction in milk production (i.e., the reduction in milk intake is more of a behavioral process than a physiological process). A reduction in the mother’s tendency to feed her pups triggers the weaning process, which will be driven by the mother’s perception of the pup’s physical, physiological, and behavioral characteristics [35] rather than the length of time after delivery [36].

In addition, we observed that mother would feed artificial diets to her cubs (Supplementary video in S1 File). This behavior was only observed between a mother and a cub. Are there any mothers in the wild who use its long tongues to stick termites or ants in gaps to feed its cubs? Peer needs to observe and verify this interesting behavior.

Furthermore, the breast of Sunda Pangolins is very different from most other mammals we commonly see. We suspect that needle-shaped nipples are more susceptible to be stabbed by acanthids and bitten by termites, so that placing the breast under the arm and retracting it is a highly effective protection strategy. However, contracted nipples make it more difficult for babies to suck. Therefore, we suspect that when cubs are suckling, the mother’s nipples are actively stretching when they are sucked or touched around the breast.

This research aimed to determine the growth characteristics of Sunda pangolin cubs during lactation. The lactation and weaning periods of Sunda pangolins were estimated according to the time taken to reach peak mass, the time at which cubs began to eat artificial diet on their own and the age at which cubs that did not transition to the artificial diet died. Few similar analyses have been done to determine weaning, whether domesticated domestic animals or captive wild mammals, whose offspring eat a diet close to their natural diet. So, the offspring of these animals are fed artificial food before the end of their mother’s lactation and their pups are weaned smoothly. Because pangolin’s natural diet is so special, our study is unique and meaningful. This study also shows the nursing behavior of Sunda pangolin, revealing the indicators of sexual maturity and physical maturity. The artificial formula used in this study is quite different from the natural food of Sunda pangolins. Therefore, the conclusions drawn in this article may only apply to the physiological information of Sunda pangolins in captivity. Although the sample size of this study is limited, it is preliminary. There is currently a lack of data on wild Sunda pangolins which precludes any comparisons being drawn, but the results of this study can still be used as a reference for artificial rescue and domestication of pangolins and provide valuable basic data for understanding this mysterious animal.

Growth information of nine Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cubs.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Fitted values of the feeding (n = 4) and non-feeding (n = 5) groups of Sunda pangolins (Manis javanica) at different ages.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

The regression equation of the growth curve for each cub.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Details regarding the length and mass of female Sunda pangolins (Manis javanica) at maturity.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.

Supplementary video.

(MP4)

Click here for additional data file.

13 May 2022

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Bi-Song Yue, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"This study was funded by the Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi (2018GXNSFAA294066), the State Forestry Administration of China (Reference number: 2019072), Guangxi Forestry Bureau (Reference numbers: GL2018kt-17 and GL2020kt-25)."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This study was funded by the Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi (2018GXNSFAA294066), the State Forestry Administration of China (Reference number: 2019072), Guangxi Forestry Bureau (Reference numbers: GL2018kt-17 and GL2020kt-25). "

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"This study was funded by the Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi (2018GXNSFAA294066), the State Forestry Administration of China (Reference number: 2019072), Guangxi Forestry Bureau (Reference numbers: GL2018kt-17 and GL2020kt-25)."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4.  Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The submitted manuscript focuses on establishing the weaning age and estimating the growth patterns of captive Sunda pangolin. The work presented in this study should be treated as very preliminary results.

Major issues

1. The aim of the study is not clearly stated in the introduction.

2. Abstract should be rewritten as it does not present clearly the study and its results.

3. The authors estimate growth patterns of several animals, but they never discuss it in the discussion. What growth patters gave your study? What did you learn from this? How can it help captive Sunda pangolin in the future? Was the same analysis used in different studies on captive animals? How did it help those species?

Also it should be clearly noted that the number of animals used in this study should does not allow to make strong conclusions and should be treated as a very preliminary study.

4. Most of discussion should be placed in results in section on

"video observations", which is completely missing from the "Results". Style of writing of the discussion is not very scientific. There is very little references used, which is understandable when knowledge on the topic is scare, however, there is no comparison to similar studies on other captive species. This would give the reader more perspective on where this research could lead.

Thus, I highly recommend to the Authors to place this study in the more global perspective and compare it with similar works in different captive species. Without is this work is not even the preliminary results, but merely a guess based on very imited data.

Minor issues

Table S2 - "fitted values" of what?

Wrong order of Figures in the text.

LINE 179-187 - please keep the order models as the animlas from in table or clearly divide them in two groups of animals.

Figure S1 - should be in main text

Reviewer #2: The research is well designed and implemented. Due to the lack of information about wild Sunda pangolins, the information obtained from this article seems to provide valuable basic data for domestication and rescuing orphaned pangolins.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

2 Jul 2022

R: Requirement, Q: Question, A: Answer.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

R1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

A1: We have revised the manuscript according to PLOS ONE’s style requirements.

R2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"This study was funded by the Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi (2018GXNSFAA294066), the State Forestry Administration of China (Reference number: 2019072), Guangxi Forestry Bureau (Reference numbers: GL2018kt-17 and GL2020kt-25)."

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed.

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

A2: We have stated “The funders had no role in study design data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript” in our cover letter.

R3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This study was funded by the Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi (2018GXNSFAA294066), the State Forestry Administration of China (Reference number: 2019072), Guangxi Forestry Bureau (Reference numbers: GL2018kt-17 and GL2020kt-25). "

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"This study was funded by the Nature Science Foundation of Guangxi (2018GXNSFAA294066), the State Forestry Administration of China (Reference number: 2019072), Guangxi Forestry Bureau (Reference numbers: GL2018kt-17 and GL2020kt-25)."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

A3: The funding-related text has been removed from the manuscript. In addition, the funding statement has not been updated.

Q4. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well.

A4: The ethics statement has been included in the ‘Materials and methods’ section of the revised manuscript.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The submitted manuscript focuses on establishing the weaning age and estimating the growth patterns of captive Sunda pangolin. The work presented in this study should be treated as very preliminary results.

Major issues

Q1. The aim of the study is not clearly stated in the introduction.

A1: The introduction has been revised as required, and the aim and significance are summarized at the end. Please refer to line 65-102 of the revised manuscript.

Q2. Abstract should be rewritten as it does not present clearly the study and its results.

A2: Abstract has been rewritten as required, please refer to line 34-62 of the revised manuscript.

Q3. The authors estimate growth patterns of several animals, but they never discuss it in the discussion. What growth patters gave your study? What did you learn from this? How can it help captive Sunda pangolin in the future? Was the same analysis used in different studies on captive animals? How did it help those species?

Also it should be clearly noted that the number of animals used in this study should does not allow to make strong conclusions and should be treated as a very preliminary study.

A3: Growth patterns of nonvoluntarily ingested artificial feed (NIAF) and voluntarily ingested artificial feed (VIAF) groups and individual growth patterns of all 9 pups. The cubic equation fitting model best reflects the growth process of these individuals or groups. The fitting degree of the 9 individual fitting models was above 0.995, and the fitting degree of the 2 group models was above 0.95.

What did you learn from this?

The captive breeding of pangolins is a worldwide problem, and there is no reference to pangolin breeding before this. We are the first to report in detail the growth pattern of pangolin species (one of 8) cubs, and determine the weaning period and lactation period by studying the growth pattern, formulate a parenting plan, and decide when to induce the pups to eat artificial feed. Improving the survival rate of pangolin pups after weaning.

How can it help captive Sunda pangolin in the future?

Three pangolin species, including the Sunda pangolin, are critically endangered species, and ex situ conservation is also an important option while strengthening wild protection. This study can provide valuable references for the conservation of pangolins and the rescue of orphaned pangolins.

Was the same analysis used in different studies on captive animals?

There are few similar analyses to determine the weaning period, as both domesticated domestic animals and captive wild mammals are given feeds that are close to their natural diets in the management of their offspring. Therefore, the offspring of these animals start to eat artificial feed before the end of lactating, and the cubs can be weaned smoothly. Because the natural food of pangolins is too special, the feed we give to captive pangolins is a synthetic feed composed of about 30-40% black ants, plus silkworm pupae, etc. The smell and taste of their natural food termites are too different. In fact, black ants may not be the main natural food of Malay pangolins, because most of the wild pangolins that we just received rescued did not eat black ants, but termites. The cub's genetic memory can only eat termites, and although the mother eats artificial food, it cannot follow the food.

How did it help those species?

This research set out to determine the growth characteristics of Sunda pangolin cubs during lactation. The information obtained from this article can provide valuable basic data for domestication and rescuing orphaned pangolins.

Also it should be clearly noted that the number of animals used in this study should does not allow to make strong conclusions and should be treated as a very preliminary study.

We agree with the reviewers.

Q4. Most of discussion should be placed in results in section on "video observations", which is completely missing from the "Results". Style of writing of the discussion is not very scientific. There is very little references used, which is understandable when knowledge on the topic is scare, however, there is no comparison to similar studies on other captive species. This would give the reader more perspective on where this research could lead.

Thus, I highly recommend to the Authors to place this study in the more global perspective and compare it with similar works in different captive species. Without is this work is not even the preliminary results, but merely a guess based on very imited data.

A4: We have adjusted some content in Results and Discussion. And we have added references and their content, and discussed.

Q5: Table S2 - "fitted values" of what?

A5: The fitted value is the point estimate of the mean response to a given predictive variable value

Q6: Wrong order of Figures in the text.

A6: The order of Figures has been corrected.

Q7: LINE 179-187 - please keep the order models as the animals from in table or clearly divide them in two groups of animals.

A7: We have changed the way data and results are presented (S3).

Q8: Figure S1 - should be in main text

A8: We have made changes based on the reviewer's comments.

Reviewer #2: The research is well designed and implemented. Due to the lack of information about wild Sunda pangolins, the information obtained from this article seems to provide valuable basic data for domestication and rescuing orphaned pangolins.

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

12 Jul 2022

Weaning period and growth patterns of captive Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cubs

PONE-D-22-10275R1

Dear Dr. Yan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Bi-Song Yue, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

23 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-10275R1

Weaning period and growth patterns of captive Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica) cubs

Dear Dr. Yan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Bi-Song Yue

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE