| Literature DB >> 36101458 |
Aldo Arrais1, Fabio Testori1, Roberta Calligari1, Valentina Gianotti1, Maddalena Roncoli2, Alice Caramaschi1, Valeria Todeschini2, Nadia Massa2, Elisa Bona1.
Abstract
As dramatically experienced in the recent world pandemic, viral, bacterial, fungal pathogens constitute very serious concerns in the global context of human health. Regarding this issue, the World Health Organization has promoted research studies that aim to develop new strategies using natural products. Although they are often competitive with synthetic pharmaceuticales in clinical performance, they lack their critical drawbacks, i.e., the environmental impact and the high economic costs of processing. In this paper, the isolation of a highly performant antibacterial and antifungal lipophilic natural mixture from leaves of savoy and white cabbages is proposed as successful preliminary results for the valorization of agricultural waste produced in cabbage cultivation. The fraction was chemically extracted from vegetables with diethyl ether and tested against two Candida species, as well as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus reference strains. All the different fractions (active and not active) were chemically characterized by vibrational FT-IR spectroscopy and GC-MS analyses. The extracts showed high growth-inhibition performance on pathogens, thus demonstrating strong application potential. We think that this work, despite being at a preliminary stage, is very promising, both from pharmaceutical and industrial points of view, and can be proposed as a proof of concept for the recovery of agricultural production wastes.Entities:
Keywords: C. albicans; C. glabrata; K. pneumoniae; P. aeruginosa; S. aureus; antibacterial activity; antifungal activity; diethyl ether extraction; savoy cabbage; white cabbage
Year: 2022 PMID: 36101458 PMCID: PMC9312816 DOI: 10.3390/biology11071080
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Extraction procedure; biological and chemical characterization of the produced mixture.
Oven temperature program.
| Rate (°C/min) | Temperature (°C) | Hold Time (min) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | 45.0 | 2.0 | |
| Ramp 1 | 3.0 | 100.0 | 0.1 |
| Ramp 2 | 5.0 | 135.0 | 0.1 |
| Ramp 3 | 8.0 | 250.0 | 12.0 |
Figure 2Antifungal assay results, using the disk diffusion method (halo diameter (mm)) from extracts obtained from Savoy cabbage (green box, VCE) and white cabbage (white box, WCE) induced in C. albicans ATCC 14053 (A) and C. glabrata ATCC 15126 (B) compared with Clotrimazole (Grey-CLO). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences, according to Kruskal-Wallis followed by Nemenyi’s post hoc test (p-value cutoff = 0.05).
Figure 3Antibacterial assay results using the disk diffusion method (halo diameter (mm)) from extracts obtained from Savoy cabbage (green box, VCE) and white cabbage (white box, WCE) induced in S. aureus NCTC6571 (A), P. aeruginosa ATCC27853 (B), and K. pneumoniae ATCC13883 (C) compared with the reference antibiotic drug (grey): vancomycin (VAN) and meropenem (MRP). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences, according to Kruskal–Wallis followed by Nemenyi’s post-hoc test (p-value cutoff = 0.05).
Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) obtained by the microdilution method using extracts from Savoy and white cabbage.
| Microorganisms 1 | Savoy Cabbage (VCE) | White Cabbage (WCE) |
|---|---|---|
| 0.062% | 0.062% | |
| 0.062% | 0.062% | |
| 0.125% | 0.062% | |
| 0.25% | >4% | |
| 0.25% | >4% |
VCE: Savoy cabbage extracts; WCE: White cabbage extracts. 1 Reference strains used for the biological activity assays.
Figure 4(A) Comparison of the IR profiles of the extracts featured with biological activity obtained using diethyl ether from Savoy cabbage (blue line) and white cabbage (red line). Experimental observed peaks (in cm−1): savoy cabbage, 3450 (vs, vbr), 3013 (vw), 2960 (s), 2920 (vs), 2851 (vs), 1737 (s), 1712 (br), 1641 (vs, br), 1471 (vs, sh), 1465 (vs, sh), 1414 (w, br), 1382 (vs, sh), 1299 (vs, br),1263 (br), 1198, 1175 (s), 1135, 1111 (s), 1078 (vs), 989 (w), 965, 922, 892 (s), 861 (w), 821 (w), 780 (w, br), 746 (w, br), 732 (vs, vsh), 722 (vs, vsh), 560 (br); white cabbage, 3450 (vs, vbr), 3013 (vw), 2960 (s), 2920 (vs), 2851 (vs), 1737 (s), 1712 (br), 1641 (vs, br), 1471 (vs, sh), 1465 (vs, sh), 1414 (w, br), 1380 (s, br), 1299 (vs, br), 1263 (br), 1198, 1175 (s), 1135, 111 (s), 1078 (vs), 989 (w), 965, 922, 892 (s), 861 (w), 821 (w), 780 (w, br), 746 (w, br), 732 (vs, vsh), 722 (vs, vsh), and 560 (br). (B) Comparison of the IR profiles of the sulfured honey-like by-products, extracted with diethyl ether, without biological activity, from Savoy cabbage (red line) and white cabbage (purple line). Experimental observed peaks (in cm−1): Savoy cabbage, 3400 (vs, vbr), 2938 (vs, br), 2885 (s, br), 1670 (s, br), 1639 (vs, br), 1457 (br), 1412 (vs, br), 1348 (br), 1263 (s, br), 1184 (br), 1145 (br), 1100 (br), 1078 (br), 1060 (br), 1032 (br), 987 (br), 922 (vs, br), 898 (br), 870 (vs, br), 821 (vs, br), 782 (vs, br), 703 (br), 635 (vs, br), 594 (vs, br), 562 (vs, br), 525 (vs, br), 422 (s, br); white cabbage, 3400 (vs, vbr), 2938 (vs, br), 2885 (s, br), 1670 (s, br), 1639 (vs, br), 1457 (br), 1410 (vs, br), 1348 (br), 1263 (s, br), 1184 (br), 1145 (br), 1100 (br), 1078 (br), 1060 (br), 1032 (br), 987 (br), 922 (vs, br), 898 (br), 870 (vs, br), 821 (vs, br), 782 (vs, br), 703 (br), 635 (vs, br), 594 (vs, br), 562 (vs, br), 525 (vs, br), 422 (s, br). Legend: s strong, vs very strong, w weak, br broad, vbr very broad, sh sharp, vsh very sharp.
Figure 5GC-MS chromatograms of diethyl-ether extracts from Savoy (A) and white (B) cabbage leaves. The chromatographic characterization was performed using a Finnigan Trace GC-Ultra and Trace DSQ. The inlet temperature was set to 250 °C in splitless mode, and helium was used as the carrier gas with a constant flow of 1.0 mL/min.
Compounds identified by GC-MS method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 17.2 | 2,4-Dimethyl | Aromatic | 0 | 88 | ----------- | -------- |
|
| 20.7 | Dimethyl | Thioether | 154 | 612 | Antimicrobial activity | [ |
|
| 27.5 | 4-(Methylsulfanyl) | Nitrile | 0 | 320 | Sulfur compound present in | [ |
|
| 28.3 | 1-Tridecanal | Aldehyde | 0 | 284 | Component of essential oil from leaves and seeds of | [ |
|
| 30.3 | 1,4-Dihydro-9,9-dimethyl-1,4-methanonaphtalene-2,3-dicarbonitrile | 0 | Dicarbonitrile | 75 | ---------- | ----- |
|
| 30.3 | Methyl-4,4,7-trimethyl-4,7-dihydroindan-6-carboxylate | Ester | 0 | 75 | Component of | [ |
|
| 30.7 | (Allylsulfanyl) acetonitrile | Nitrile | 0 | 222 | ------------ | -------- |
|
| 31.2 | 1,2,4-Trithiolane | Heterocyclic sulfur | 34 | 0 | Component of fresh mushroom flavor | [ |
|
| 31.39 | 1-Isothiocyanato-3-(methylthio)-propane | Thiocyanate | 0 | 671 | Component of | [ |
|
| 31.40 | S-methylmethanethiosulfonate | Thiosulfonate | 0 | 663 | Component of cabbage ( | [ |
|
| 32.16 | Lauraldehyde | Aldehyde | 26 | 0 | Component of essential oil from | [ |
|
| 32.61 | 5-Methyl-1,3-thiazole | Aromatic | 387 | 901 | Antibacterial activity | [ |
|
| 33.49 | 2-Hexadecanone | Ketone | 62 | 447 | Component of essential oil from | [ |
|
| 33.58 | [1-(Mercaptomethyl)-2-propenyl] carbamic acid methyl ester | Ester | 0 | 19 | ------------ | ----------- |
|
| 33.72 | 1-Hydroxy-4-methyl-2,6-di-tert-butylbenzene (BHT) | Alkylated phenol | 435 | 98 | Antioxidant | [ |
|
| 33.83 | Myristaldehyde | Aldehyde | 35 | 607 | Component of | [ |
|
| 34.39 | 2-Methyl-4-(1H-pyrazol-4-YL)- | Aromatic | 0 | 637 | ------------- | ----------- |
|
| 34.87 | N,N-Dimethyl-N,N-dimethoxysulfinyl-hydrazine | Hydrazine | 58 | 0 | ------------ | ------------ |
|
| 35.20 | Methyl tridecyl ketone | Ketone | 77 | 795 | Component of essential oil from | [ |
|
| 36.20 | 2,6-Di(t-butyl)-4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-one | Ketone | 89 | 0 | ------------- | ----------- |
|
| 38.69 | 3-(tert-Butyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,4-benzoxazine | Heterocyclic bicycle | 39 | 0 | ------------- | ---------- |
|
| 39.91 | Myristic acid | Saturated long-chain fatty acid | 0 | 3220 | Extracts from leaves and seeds of | [ |
|
| 40.42 | (E)-1-Azido-2- | Azide | 101 | 0 | ------------ | ----------- |
|
| 40.90 | 5-Methyl-1H-indole | Aromatic | 39 | 0 | ----------- | ----------- |
|
| 41.06 | Bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate | Ester | 0 | 205 | ----------- | ------------ |
|
| 42.31 | 2,3-Dihydro-1,3-methano-1H-cyclopenta[B]quinoxaline | Aromatic | 0 | 376 | ----------- | ----------- |
|
| 42.60 | Methyl tridecanoate | Ester | 44 | 0 | Extracts from | [ |
|
| 43.85 | Tetratetracontane | Long chain alkane | 321 | 6984 | Antioxidant and cytoprotective | [ |
|
| 44.98 | Hexadecanal | Aldehyde | 0 | 386 | ------------ | ------------ |
|
| 45.07 | Octacosane | Straight-chain alkane | 2565 | 15,364 | Antimicrobial activity | [ |
|
| 46.33 | β-Sitosterol | Sterol | 0 | 1219 | Antimicrobial, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-asthma, diuretic antiarthritic. | [ |
|
| 48.68 | 15-Nonacosanone | Ketone | 0 | 30,507 | Antimicrobial activity | [ |
|
| 48.71 | Octadecanoic acid | Carboxylic acid | 138 | 0 | Component of | [ |
|
| 50.74 | (Z,Z)-9,12-Octadecadienoic acid | Carboxylic acid | 112 | 0 | Extracts from | [ |
|
| 50.78 | 17-Pentatriacontene | Alkene | 0 | 2189 | Antinflammatory, | [ |
|
| 51.03 | 1,2-Hexadecanediol | Diol | 0 | 4718 | Extracts from | [ |
|
| 51.59 | 1-Heneicosyl | Ester | 0 | 567 | Biocontrol | [ |
|
| 52.72 | Linolenic acid | 593 | 0 | ------ | -- |