| Literature DB >> 36101386 |
Natasha Travenisk Hoff1,2,3, June Ferraz Dias1, Edgar Pinto4,5, Agostinho Almeida4, Rafael Schroeder3,6, Alberto Teodorico Correia3,7,8.
Abstract
In this study, otolith geochemical signatures (Element:Ca ratios) were used to investigate the long-term spatial shifts of the population structure of Isopisthus parvipinnis, Bigtooth corvina, an economically and ecologically important Brazilian fish species. Two-hundred and ninety-seven juvenile individuals from historical (1975) and contemporary (2018/2019) samples were collected in five subareas [São Paulo: North-NSP, Center-CSP and South-SSP; Paraná (PR) and Santa Catarina (SC)] of the shallow waters off the coast of the South Brazil Bight were analyzed. The main informative single elements were Co:Ca, Cu:Ca, Li:Ca, Mg:Ca, Mn:Ca, Ni:Ca, Na:Ca, and Rb:Ca. Multivariate analysis showed spatial differences in otolith chemical composition over the years. Samples from 1975 presented an overall low reclassification rate (58%), suggesting the existence of two population units: (1) SP + PR; and (2) SC. However, samples from 2018/2019 discriminated four distinct population units with a good overall reclassification (80%): (1) NSP; (2) CSP; (3) SSP + PR; and (4) SC. This spatial differentiation on the geochemical signatures probably reflects the effects of long-term temporal variability in oceanographic conditions, anthropogenic influence, and climate change on this coastal ecosystem. The data also corroborate and refines the population structure scenario of I. parvipinnis recently described using complementary phenotypic tags.Entities:
Keywords: Sciaenidae; otolith fingerprints; population units; temporal shifts
Year: 2022 PMID: 36101386 PMCID: PMC9312297 DOI: 10.3390/biology11071005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Sampling locations of Isopisthus parvipinnis juvenile individuals collected in 1975 (squares) and 2018/2019 (stars) in the South Brazil Bight from 23° S to 26.9° S, between São Paulo and Santa Catarina states. Legend: North of São Paulo (NSP), Center of São Paulo (CSP), South of São Paulo (SSP), Paraná (PR), Santa Catarina (SC).
States, locations, and their respective code, period of capture, sample size (n), total length (TL, mm) and otolith mass (OM, mg) of Isopisthus parvipinnis used in this study. For TL and OM, mean and standard deviation are presented. Legend: North of São Paulo (NSP), Center of São Paulo (CSP), South of São Paulo (SSP), Paraná (PR), Santa Catarina (SC).
| States | Location | Code | 1975 | 2018/2019 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period |
| TL (mm) | OM (mg) | Period |
| TL (mm) | OM (mg) | |||
| São Paulo | Ubatuba | NSP | Sep. and Nov. | 30 | 109 ± 12 | 26.39 ± 6.64 | Nov. | 30 | 110 ± 11 | 30.74 ± 7.38 |
| Peruíbe | CSP | Sep. and Nov. | 30 | 108 ± 14 | 27.89 ± 8.14 | Nov. | 30 | 134 ± 5 | 46.29 ± 4.03 | |
| Cananéia | SSP | Sep. and Nov. | 30 | 109 ± 14 | 28.97 ± 8.67 | Oct. | 30 | 113 ± 8 | 32.95 ± 4.95 | |
| Paraná | Paranaguá | PR | Sep. and Nov. | 30 | 109 ± 14 | 30.06 ± 9.22 | Sep. | 30 | 112 ± 11 | 32.83 ± 7.30 |
| Santa Catarina | Itajaí | SC | Sep. and Nov. | 29 | 111 ± 14 | 29.45 ± 8.77 | May | 28 | 76 ± 10 | 11.74 ± 4.40 |
Two-Way ANOVA comparisons among the five sampling locations regarding the chemical composition of Isopisthus parvipinnis otoliths collected in 1975 and 2018/2019. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were marked in bold.
| Ba:Ca | Co:Ca | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF | SS | MS | F |
| DF | SS | MS | F |
| |
| Year | 1 | 29,477 | 29,477 | 174.20 |
| 1 | 0.0205 | 0.0205 | 0.3514 | 0.5538 |
| Location | 4 | 17,719 | 4429.7 | 26.180 |
| 4 | 29.862 | 7.4654 | 128.20 |
|
| Interaction | 4 | 14,975 | 3743.7 | 22.130 |
| 4 | 2.8357 | 0.7089 | 12.180 |
|
| Within | 287 | 48,560 | 169.20 | 287 | 16.706 | 0.0582 | ||||
| Total | 296 | 110,568 | 296 | 49.435 | ||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year | 1 | 6.8509 | 6.8509 | 45.080 |
| 1 | 0.2463 | 0.246 | 31.740 |
|
| Location | 4 | 4.2744 | 1.0686 | 7.0320 |
| 4 | 0.3217 | 0.080 | 10.370 |
|
| Interaction | 4 | 24.288 | 6.0720 | 39.960 |
| 4 | 0.1510 | 0.038 | 4.8650 |
|
| Within | 271 | 41.184 | 0.1520 | 286 | 2.2191 | 0.008 | ||||
| Total | 280 | 77.142 | 295 | 2.9420 | ||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year | 1 | 9181.7 | 9181.7 | 284.800 |
| 1 | 1851.8 | 1851.8 | 101.40 |
|
| Location | 4 | 9145.9 | 2286.5 | 70.910 |
| 4 | 2494.5 | 623.62 | 34.160 |
|
| Interaction | 4 | 5683.1 | 1420.8 | 44.060 |
| 4 | 1708.1 | 427.03 | 23.390 |
|
| Within | 287 | 9253.7 | 32.243 | 287 | 5239.6 | 18.256 | ||||
| Total | 296 | 33,363 | 296 | 11,323 | ||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year | 1 | 2.58 × 105 | 2.58 × 105 | 1.4630 | 0.2275 | 1 | 7.3276 | 7.3276 | 0.6257 | 0.4296 |
| Location | 4 | 6.40 × 106 | 1.60 × 106 | 9.0870 |
| 4 | 3935.9 | 983.97 | 84.020 |
|
| Interaction | 4 | 6.60 × 106 | 1.65 × 106 | 9.3770 |
| 4 | 241.86 | 60.465 | 5.1630 |
|
| Within | 287 | 5.05 × 107 | 1.76 × 105 | 287 | 3361.3 | 11.712 | ||||
| Total | 296 | 6.38 × 107 | 296 | 7548.7 | ||||||
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Year | 1 | 3.3757 | 3.3757 | 788.8 |
| 1 | 0.0010 | 0.0010 | 2.4540 | 0.1183 |
| Location | 4 | 0.4424 | 0.1106 | 25.84 |
| 4 | 0.0298 | 0.0074 | 17.910 |
|
| Interaction | 4 | 0.0370 | 0.0093 | 2.163 | 0.0732 | 4 | 0.0060 | 0.0015 | 3.5890 |
|
| Within | 287 | 1.2283 | 0.0043 | 287 | 0.1192 | 0.0004 | ||||
| Total | 296 | 5.0685 | 296 | 0.1560 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Year | 1 | 7.18 × 106 | 7.18 × 106 | 53.850 |
| |||||
| Location | 4 | 1.97 × 107 | 4.92 × 106 | 36.890 |
| |||||
| Interaction | 4 | 3.37 × 106 | 8.42 × 105 | 6.3160 |
| |||||
| Within | 287 | 3.83 × 107 | 1.33 × 105 | |||||||
| Total | 296 | 6.86 × 107 | ||||||||
Figure 2Element:Ca ratios in otoliths of Isopisthus parvipinnis collected in the South Brazil Bight in 1975 and 2018/2019. Locations sharing the same letter (year 1975) or number (year 2018/2019) do not show any statistical difference (Two-Way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc tests, p > 0.05). Significant time differences in each location are shown by an asterisk (*) (Two-Way ANOVA, Tukey’s post-hoc tests, p < 0.05). Data are presented as mean values ± SE. Legend: North of São Paulo (NSP), Center of São Paulo (CSP), South of São Paulo (SSP), Paraná (PR), Santa Catarina (SC).
Overall and pairwise PERMANOVA comparisons among the five sampling locations regarding the chemical composition of Isopisthus parvipinnis otoliths collected in 1975 and 2018/2019. Significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) were marked in bold. Legend: North of São Paulo (NSP), Center of São Paulo (CSP), South of São Paulo (SSP), Paraná (PR), Santa Catarina (SC).
| Overall PERMANOVA | Pairwise PERMANOVA | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source | SS | DF | MS | F |
| NSP | CSP | SSP | PR | SC | ||
| Year | 9.99 × 106 | 1 | 9.99 × 106 | 30.100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Location | 2.74 × 107 | 4 | 6.86 ×106 | 20.676 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Interaction | 8.23 × 106 | 4 | 2.06 × 106 | 6.1994 |
|
|
|
| 0.9031 |
| ||
| Residual | 9.54 × 107 | 287 | 3.32 × 105 |
|
|
| 0.9367 |
| ||||
| Total | 1.40 × 108 | 296 |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
Figure 3Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) plots from otoliths chemical composition analysis of Isopisthus parvipinnis collected in the five sampling locations in the South Brazil Bight in 1975 and 2018/2019. Legend: North of São Paulo (NSP), Center of São Paulo (CSP), South of São Paulo (SSP), Paraná (PR), and Santa Catarina (SC).
Jackknifed cross-validation reclassification matrices obtained from otolith’s elemental composition of Isopisthus parvipinnis from all sampling locations for the years 1975 and 2018/2019. Legend: North of São Paulo (NSP), Center of São Paulo (CSP), South of São Paulo (SSP), Paraná (PR), Santa Catarina (SC).
| 1975 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original | Predicted Location | % Correct | ||||
| NSP | CSP | SSP | PR | SC | ||
|
| 21 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 70 |
|
| 12 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 30 |
|
| 0 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 43 |
|
| 3 | 1 | 11 | 15 | 0 | 50 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 100 |
|
| 58 | |||||
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 97 |
|
| 4 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 87 |
|
| 0 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 60 |
|
| 1 | 2 | 10 | 17 | 0 | 57 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 100 |
|
| 80 | |||||