| Literature DB >> 36100849 |
Juan Carlos Fragoso-Jiménez1, Rosa María Gutierrez-Rios1, Noemí Flores1, Alfredo Martinez1, Alvaro R Lara2, Frank Delvigne3, Guillermo Gosset4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The modification of glucose import capacity is an engineering strategy that has been shown to improve the characteristics of Escherichia coli as a microbial factory. A reduction in glucose import capacity can have a positive effect on production strain performance, however, this is not always the case. In this study, E. coli W3110 and a group of four isogenic derivative strains, harboring single or multiple deletions of genes encoding phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS)-dependent transporters as well as non-PTS transporters were characterized by determining their transcriptomic response to reduced glucose import capacity.Entities:
Keywords: Glucose transport; Mutant; Physiology; RNA-seq; Transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36100849 PMCID: PMC9472385 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-022-01909-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 6.352
E. coli strains employed in this study
| Name | Description | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| Strains | ||
| W3110 | [ | |
| WG | W3110 Δ | [ |
| WGM | WG, Δ | [ |
| WGMC | WGM, Δ | [ |
| WHIC | W3110 Δ | [ |
Fig. 1Description of the strains employed in this study. WGΔptsG::FRT; WGM ΔptsG::FRT, ΔmanX::FRT; WGMC ΔptsG::FRT, ΔmanX::FRT, ΔmglABC::FRT-Cm-FRT; WHICΔptsHIcrr::FRT-Cm-FRT ΔmglABC::FRT-Cm-FRT
kinetic and stoichiometric parameter of cultures with E. coli W3110 and derived glucose transport mutants in stirred tank bioreactors
| Strain | Max acetate (g/L) | Y X/S (g/g) | Max biomass (g/L) | Culture time (h) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W3110 | 0.67 ± 0.03 | 1.52 ± 0.14 | 0.433 ± 0.005 | 1.94 ± 0.04 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 8.4 ± 1.21 | 10 |
| WG | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 1.11 ± 0.19 | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 8.5 ± 0.23 | 14 |
| WGM | 0.34 ± 0.01 | 0.62 ± 0.05 | ND | ND | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 9.63 ± 0.01 | 20 |
| WGMC | 0.37 ± 0.00 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 0.015 ± 0.001 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 7.14 ± 0.64 | 18 |
| WHIC | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.001 ± 0.001 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 9.23 ± 0.53 | 28 |
Fig. 2Specific growth rate as a function of specific glucose uptake rate for the E. coli strains characterized in this study. Specific growth rate (µ), specific glucose consumption rate (qs)
Statistics of RNA-seq libraries
| Strain | Library size (million reads) | Average library size (million reads) | Mapped reads (million reads) | Average mapped reads (million reads) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W3110 | 48,37,42 | 43 ± 5.7 | 4.7,2.9,2.3 | 3.3 ± 1.2 |
| WG | 59,31,33 | 41 ± 15.9 | 4.2,1.4,1.7 | 2.4 ± 1.2 |
| WGM | 32,52,53 | 46 ± 11.7 | 2.2,4.2,2.5 | 3.0 ± 1.1 |
| WGMC | 51,56,35 | 47 ± 11.2 | 4.7,5.9,1.8 | 4.2 ± 2.1 |
| WHIC | 52,54,54 | 53 ± 1.5 | 2.9,2.7,2.3 | 2.6 ± 0.3 |
Fig. 3Distribution of differentially expressed genes among mutant strains in Clusters of Orthologous genes when comparing transcriptomes of W3110 with mutant strains WG, WGM, WGMC, and WHIC. The qs value for each strain is shown between parenthesis and it is presented as g glucose/g DCW h Values for GFP yield from biomass (YGFP/X) were obtained from a previous publication [11] and are expressed as mg GFP/g DCW
Number of differentially expressed genes in pair-wise comparisons
| Strains comparison | WG-W3110 | WGM-WG | WGMC-WGM | WHIC-WGMC | WGM-W3110 | WGMC-W3110 | WHIC-W3110 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up | 194 | 116 | 1 | 218 | 170 | 182 | 459 |
| Down | 88 | 136 | 11 | 203 | 31 | 40 | 320 |
| Total | 281 | 252 | 12 | 421 | 201 | 222 | 779 |
| Δ | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0 | 0.27 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.17 |
Statistics of differentially expressed genes in Cluster of Orthologous Genes*
| Comparison | WG-W3110 | WGM-WG | WGMC-WGM | WHIC-WGMC | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COG | U | D | U | D | U | D | U | D | |||||
| A | RNA processing and modification | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| B | Chromatin structure and dynamics | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| C | Energy production and conversion | 29 | 4 | 8 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 35 | ||||
| D | Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| E | Amino acid transport and metabolism | 11 | 11 | 12 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 23 | ||||
| F | Nucleotide transport and metabolism | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | ||||
| G | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism | 62 | 4 | 16 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 24 | 22 | ||||
| H | Coenzyme transport and metabolism | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | ||||
| I | Lipid transport and metabolism | 10 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 2 | ||||
| J | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
| K | Transcription | 17 | 8 | 13 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 25 | ||||
| L | Replication, recombination and repair | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| M | Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 4 | ||||
| N | Cell motility | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| O | Post-translational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 6 | ||||
| P | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism | 10 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 19 | ||||
| Q | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||||
| R | General function prediction only | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| S | Function unknown | 29 | 19 | 32 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 59 | 35 | ||||
| T | Signal transduction mechanisms | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 6 | ||||
| U | Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||||
| V | Defense mechanisms | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| W | Extracellular structures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Y | Nuclear structure | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Z | Cytoskeleton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| a | Multi-COG | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | ||||
| - | Without COG | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
aU upregulated, D downregulated, T total
Fig. 4Distribution of differentially expressed genes among pairs of strains in Clusters of Orthologous genes. The number of genes upregulated (positive value) or downregulated (negative value) from each COG is indicated. Transcriptome comparisons: WG-W3110 (yellow), WGM-WG (blue), WGMC-WGM (orange) and WHIC-WGMC (red)
Fig. 5Graphical representation of genes showing differential transcript levels when comparing strains WG and W3110
Fig. 6Graphical representation of genes showing differential transcript levels when comparing strains WGM and WG
Fig. 7Graphical representation of genes showing differential transcript levels when comparing strains WHIC and WGMC
qPCR and RNA-seq results of genes from carbon transport systems and central metabolism
| Gene | RT-qPCRa | RNA-seq | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WG | WGM | WGMC | WHIC | WG | WGM | WGMC | WHIC | ||||||
| AVG | SD | AVG | SD | AVG | SD | AVG | SD | ||||||
| Transport systems | 1.19 | 0.01 | 1.63 | 0.29 | 1.48 | 0.18 | 1.59 | 0.37 | − 0.43 | 0.18 | 0.58 | 1.40 | |
| 5.88 | 1.25 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1.19 | 0 | 2.11 | ND | ND | 1.80 | ||
| 4.38 | 0.54 | 43.34 | 4.43 | 53.34 | 3.83 | 30.95 | 11.49 | 2.08 | 5.10 | 5.04 | 5.96 | ||
| 22.73 | 4.61 | 8.42 | 0.18 | 7.27 | 0.45 | 1.64 | 0.2 | 3.89 | 3.69 | 3.86 | 2.25 | ||
| 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.73 | 0.06 | 0.91 | 0.27 | 0.96 | 0.14 | − 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.5 | 0.55 | ||
| 2.93 | 0.07 | 0.58 | 0 | 0.56 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 0.97 | − 0.61 | − 0.26 | − 1.55 | ||
| 29.11 | 10.46 | 4.55 | 0.62 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 4.46 | 1.88 | ND | ND | ||
aValues represent the logarithm of fold change when comparing gene expression values from genes of each strain against E. coli W3110. Dispersion values are not presented from RNA-seq results but can be consulted in the supplementary files