Literature DB >> 36100751

Comparative study of the function and structure of the gut microbiota in Siberian musk deer and Forest musk deer.

Rina Su1, Menggen Dalai2, Batkhuu Luvsantseren3, Chimedragchaa Chimedtseren3, Surong Hasi4.   

Abstract

Musk deer are famous for their secretion of musk; however, the scale of artificial breeding of musk deer is limited. Considering the lack of a comprehensive understanding of the gut microbiota, there is a need to study the gut microbiota of Siberian musk deer (SMD). Quantitative PCR analysis and high-throughput sequencing were used to show the differences in gut microbial communities and functions between SMD and forest musk deer (FMD). The relative abundance of Firmicutes was significantly higher in SMD than in FMD, with a corresponding decrease in Bacteroidetes, and showed significant seasonal variation. The gut microbiome of FMD has enriched activity for carbohydrate metabolism, while in SMD, amino acids and energy metabolism was higher. The key enzymatic reactions were related to pyruvate metabolism in SMD; however, in FMD, enzymes that digest cellulose (EC:3.2.1.21, EC:3.2.1.4.) were more abundant, and these were related to the living environment and feeding habits. This indicates that FMD and SMD have significant differences in their microbial communities and functions. Furthermore, antibiotic resistances were identified and significantly different in gut microbes of SMD and FMD. For SMD, seasonal variations alter microbial communities and function. The key enzymes of the short-chain fatty acids (EC:1.3.1.44, EC:6.4.1.2) were significantly different, with higher relative abundance in winter-a mechanism of natural selection and environmental adaptation. This study is the first to analyze the composition of the gut microbiota of SMD and can be used to develop or modify conservation and husbandry strategies for musk deer, to improve their productivity. KEY POINTS: • Significant differences in microbial communities and their function between FMD and SMD. • The energy metabolism and the relative abundance of Firmicutes were significantly higher in SMD. • Seasonal variations alter microbial function in SMD, carbohydrate metabolism was higher in summer.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; Forest musk deer; Gut microbiota; Metabolic function; Seasonal variation; Siberian musk deer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36100751     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-12158-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   5.560


  59 in total

1.  Gut Microbiota Orchestrates Energy Homeostasis during Cold.

Authors:  Claire Chevalier; Ozren Stojanović; Didier J Colin; Nicolas Suarez-Zamorano; Valentina Tarallo; Christelle Veyrat-Durebex; Dorothée Rigo; Salvatore Fabbiano; Ana Stevanović; Stefanie Hagemann; Xavier Montet; Yann Seimbille; Nicola Zamboni; Siegfried Hapfelmeier; Mirko Trajkovski
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species.

Authors:  E N Bergman
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Shifts in the rumen microbiota due to the type of carbohydrate and level of protein ingested by dairy cattle are associated with changes in rumen fermentation.

Authors:  Alejandro Belanche; Michel Doreau; Joan E Edwards; Jon M Moorby; Eric Pinloche; Charles J Newbold
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Dietary Fatty Acids Sustain the Growth of the Human Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Richard Agans; Alex Gordon; Denise Lynette Kramer; Sergio Perez-Burillo; José A Rufián-Henares; Oleg Paliy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease.

Authors:  Simon Carding; Kristin Verbeke; Daniel T Vipond; Bernard M Corfe; Lauren J Owen
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2015-02-02

Review 7.  Gut Bifidobacteria Populations in Human Health and Aging.

Authors:  Silvia Arboleya; Claire Watkins; Catherine Stanton; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  The microbial community in the feces of the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) as determined by barcoded pyrosequencing analysis.

Authors:  Gaorui Bian; Li Ma; Yong Su; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Strongyle Infection and Gut Microbiota: Profiling of Resistant and Susceptible Horses Over a Grazing Season.

Authors:  Allison Clark; Guillaume Sallé; Valentine Ballan; Fabrice Reigner; Annabelle Meynadier; Jacques Cortet; Christine Koch; Mickaël Riou; Alexandra Blanchard; Núria Mach
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.