Daniel Esau1, Beth L Abramson2. 1. Recently completed a fellowship in ambulatory and preventive cardiology in the Division of Cardiology at St Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Ont, and is now working in Victoria, BC. 2. Paul Albrechtsen Professor in Cardiac Prevention and Women's Health in the Division of Cardiology at St Michael's Hospital and Associate Professor of Medicine at the University of Toronto. beth.abramson@unityhealth.to.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To outline the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) dyslipidemia guidelines and to present the current approaches to cardiovascular risk stratification, including the incorporation of biomarkers and imaging tests. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Current guidelines were reviewed and an Ovid MEDLINE literature search was performed. MAIN MESSAGE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of global mortality, with ischemic heart disease contributing to nearly half of these deaths. Risk stratification is undertaken to identify patients who would benefit from primary prevention for atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD), but commonly used methods for risk stratification are imperfect. The CCS guidelines endorse that the presence of risk modifiers (family history of premature ASCVD, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level ≥2.0 mg/L, lipoprotein[a] level ≥500 mg/L [≥50 mg/dL], or coronary artery calcium >0) supports the use of statin therapy in those at intermediate risk (Framingham risk score 10% to 19.9%) who do not otherwise meet the recommendations for statin use. The CCS guidelines recommend statin therapy in patients at intermediate risk when cholesterol levels are elevated (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level ≥3.5 mmol/L, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level ≥4.2 mmol/L, or apolipoprotein B level ≥1.05 g/L). In addition, statin therapy should be considered for patients at low risk (Framingham risk score 5% to 9.9%) with elevated cholesterol levels, especially if risk modifiers are present. When cholesterol levels are not elevated, evidence still favours the use of statins in intermediate-risk patients when risk modifiers are present and in men 50 years and older and women 60 years and older with 1 additional risk factor. CONCLUSION: Biomarkers and imaging tests have the potential to improve ASCVD risk stratification by reclassifying any patient whose risk has been inaccurately estimated by traditional methods. Recently published guidelines by the CCS suggest the use of biomarkers and imaging in certain patient groups.
OBJECTIVE: To outline the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) dyslipidemia guidelines and to present the current approaches to cardiovascular risk stratification, including the incorporation of biomarkers and imaging tests. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Current guidelines were reviewed and an Ovid MEDLINE literature search was performed. MAIN MESSAGE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of global mortality, with ischemic heart disease contributing to nearly half of these deaths. Risk stratification is undertaken to identify patients who would benefit from primary prevention for atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD), but commonly used methods for risk stratification are imperfect. The CCS guidelines endorse that the presence of risk modifiers (family history of premature ASCVD, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level ≥2.0 mg/L, lipoprotein[a] level ≥500 mg/L [≥50 mg/dL], or coronary artery calcium >0) supports the use of statin therapy in those at intermediate risk (Framingham risk score 10% to 19.9%) who do not otherwise meet the recommendations for statin use. The CCS guidelines recommend statin therapy in patients at intermediate risk when cholesterol levels are elevated (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level ≥3.5 mmol/L, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level ≥4.2 mmol/L, or apolipoprotein B level ≥1.05 g/L). In addition, statin therapy should be considered for patients at low risk (Framingham risk score 5% to 9.9%) with elevated cholesterol levels, especially if risk modifiers are present. When cholesterol levels are not elevated, evidence still favours the use of statins in intermediate-risk patients when risk modifiers are present and in men 50 years and older and women 60 years and older with 1 additional risk factor. CONCLUSION: Biomarkers and imaging tests have the potential to improve ASCVD risk stratification by reclassifying any patient whose risk has been inaccurately estimated by traditional methods. Recently published guidelines by the CCS suggest the use of biomarkers and imaging in certain patient groups.
Authors: David M Leistner; Jens Klotsche; Lars Pieper; Sylvia Palm; Günter K Stalla; Hendrik Lehnert; Sigmund Silber; Winfried März; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Andreas M Zeiher Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Nadeem Sarwar; Philip Perry; Stephen Kaptoge; Kausik K Ray; Alexander Thompson; Angela M Wood; Sarah Lewington; Naveed Sattar; Chris J Packard; Rory Collins; Simon G Thompson; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Brendan M Everett; Maria Mori Brooks; Helen E A Vlachos; Bernard R Chaitman; Robert L Frye; Deepak L Bhatt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Charles Edward Frary; Marie Kofoed Blicher; Thomas Bastholm Olesen; Jacob Volmer Stidsen; Sara Vikström Greve; Julie Kk Vishram-Nielsen; Susanne Lone Rasmussen; Michael Hecht Olsen; Manan Pareek Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2019-11-12 Impact factor: 7.804
Authors: Ekaterina A Ivanova; Veronika A Myasoedova; Alexandra A Melnichenko; Andrey V Grechko; Alexander N Orekhov Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev Date: 2017-05-07 Impact factor: 6.543
Authors: Sarah Parish; Jemma C Hopewell; Michael R Hill; Santica Marcovina; Elsa Valdes-Marquez; Richard Haynes; Alison Offer; Terje R Pedersen; Colin Baigent; Rory Collins; Martin Landray; Jane Armitage Journal: Circ Genom Precis Med Date: 2018-02
Authors: Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Pei Gao; Lisa Pennells; Stephen Kaptoge; Muriel Caslake; Alexander Thompson; Adam S Butterworth; Nadeem Sarwar; David Wormser; Danish Saleheen; Christie M Ballantyne; Bruce M Psaty; Johan Sundström; Paul M Ridker; Dorothea Nagel; Richard F Gillum; Ian Ford; Pierre Ducimetiere; Stefan Kiechl; Wolfgang Koenig; Robin P F Dullaart; Gerd Assmann; Ralph B D'Agostino; Gilles R Dagenais; Jackie A Cooper; Daan Kromhout; Altan Onat; Robert W Tipping; Agustín Gómez-de-la-Cámara; Annika Rosengren; Susan E Sutherland; John Gallacher; F Gerry R Fowkes; Edoardo Casiglia; Albert Hofman; Veikko Salomaa; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Robert Clarke; Eric Brunner; J Wouter Jukema; Leon A Simons; Manjinder Sandhu; Nicholas J Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Jussi Kauhanen; Jukka T Salonen; William J Howard; Børge G Nordestgaard; Angela M Wood; Simon G Thompson; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Naveed Sattar; Chris Packard; Vilmundur Gudnason; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-20 Impact factor: 56.272