Alice C Wismer1, Milenko Rakic2, Claudia E Kuehni2, Manon Jaboyedoff3, Fabrizio Romano1, Matthias V Kopp4, Julia Brandenberger, Georg Staubli5, Kristina Keitel1. 1. From the Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland. 2. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 3. Service of Pediatrics, Department Women-Mother-Child, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland. 5. Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Childrens' University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Standardized, harmonized data sets generated through routine clinical and administrative documentation can greatly accelerate the generation of evidence to improve patient care. The objective of this study was to define a pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) minimal dataset for Switzerland (Swiss PEM minimal dataset) and to contribute a subspecialty module to a national pediatric data harmonization process (SwissPedData). METHODS: We completed a modified Delphi survey, inviting experts from all major Swiss pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). RESULTS: Twelve experts from 10 Swiss PEDs, through 3 Delphi survey rounds and a moderated e-mail discussion, suggested a subspecialty module for PEM to complement the newly developed SwissPedData main common data model (CDM). The PEM subspecialty CDM contains 28 common data elements (CDEs) specific to PEM. Additional CDEs cover PEM-specific admission processes (type of arrival), timestamps (time of death), greater details on investigations and treatments received at the PED, and PEM procedures (eg, procedural sedation). In addition to the 28 CDEs specific to PEM, 43 items from the SwissPedData main CDM were selected to create a Swiss PEM minimal dataset. The final Swiss PEM minimal dataset was similar in scope and content to the registry of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. CONCLUSIONS: A practical minimal dataset for PEM in Switzerland was developed through recognized consensus methodology. The Swiss PEM minimal dataset developed by Swiss PEM experts will facilitate international data sharing for PEM research and quality improvement projects.
OBJECTIVES: Standardized, harmonized data sets generated through routine clinical and administrative documentation can greatly accelerate the generation of evidence to improve patient care. The objective of this study was to define a pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) minimal dataset for Switzerland (Swiss PEM minimal dataset) and to contribute a subspecialty module to a national pediatric data harmonization process (SwissPedData). METHODS: We completed a modified Delphi survey, inviting experts from all major Swiss pediatric emergency departments (PEDs). RESULTS: Twelve experts from 10 Swiss PEDs, through 3 Delphi survey rounds and a moderated e-mail discussion, suggested a subspecialty module for PEM to complement the newly developed SwissPedData main common data model (CDM). The PEM subspecialty CDM contains 28 common data elements (CDEs) specific to PEM. Additional CDEs cover PEM-specific admission processes (type of arrival), timestamps (time of death), greater details on investigations and treatments received at the PED, and PEM procedures (eg, procedural sedation). In addition to the 28 CDEs specific to PEM, 43 items from the SwissPedData main CDM were selected to create a Swiss PEM minimal dataset. The final Swiss PEM minimal dataset was similar in scope and content to the registry of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network. CONCLUSIONS: A practical minimal dataset for PEM in Switzerland was developed through recognized consensus methodology. The Swiss PEM minimal dataset developed by Swiss PEM experts will facilitate international data sharing for PEM research and quality improvement projects.
Authors: Sara J Deakyne Davies; Robert W Grundmeier; Diego A Campos; Katie L Hayes; Jamie Bell; Evaline A Alessandrini; Lalit Bajaj; James M Chamberlain; Marc H Gorelick; Rene Enriquez; T Charles Casper; Beth Scheid; Marlena Kittick; J Michael Dean; Elizabeth R Alpern Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Robert M Califf; Melissa A Robb; Andrew B Bindman; Josephine P Briggs; Francis S Collins; Patrick H Conway; Trinka S Coster; Francesca E Cunningham; Nancy De Lew; Karen B DeSalvo; Christine Dymek; Victor J Dzau; Rachael L Fleurence; Richard G Frank; J Michael Gaziano; Petra Kaufmann; Michael Lauer; Peter W Marks; J Michael McGinnis; Chesley Richards; Joe V Selby; David J Shulkin; Jeffrey Shuren; Andrew M Slavitt; Scott R Smith; B Vindell Washington; P Jon White; Janet Woodcock; Jonathan Woodson; Rachel E Sherman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Terry P Klassen; Jason Acworth; Liza Bialy; Karen Black; James M Chamberlain; Nicholas Cheng; Stuart Dalziel; Ricardo M Fernandes; Eleanor Fitzpatrick; David W Johnson; Nathan Kuppermann; Charles G Macias; Mandi Newton; Martin H Osmond; Amy Plint; Paolo Valerio; Yehezkel Waisman Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Guillermo A Bonilla; Beatriz E Montoya; Victoria E Restrepo; Miguel M Gomez; Alfredo A Sánchez; Jose I Sánchez; Hugo A Rodríguez; Jairo A Rincón; Antonio L Solano; Diego Cardona; Saúl L Martínez; Alejandro López; Jose L Moore Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2020-11-15 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Emily Stone; Nicole Rankin; Jane Phillips; Kwun Fong; David C Currow; Alistair Miller; Geraldine Largey; Robert Zielinski; Peter Flynn; Tim Shaw Journal: Respirology Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 6.424