Oliver Stirrup1, James Blackstone2, Fiona Mapp1, Alyson MacNeil3, Monica Panca3, Alison Holmes4, Nicholas Machin5, Gee Yen Shin6, Tabitha Mahungu7, Kordo Saeed8, Tranprit Saluja9, Yusri Taha10, Nikunj Mahida11, Cassie Pope12, Anu Chawla13, Maria-Teresa Cutino-Moguel14, Asif Tamuri15, Rachel Williams16, Alistair Darby17, David L Robertson18, Flavia Flaviani19, Eleni Nastouli6, Samuel Robson20, Darren Smith21, Kenneth Laing22, Irene Monahan22, Beatrix Kele14, Sam Haldenby17, Ryan George5, Matthew Bashton21, Adam A Witney22, Matthew Byott23, Francesc Coll24, Michael Chapman25, Sharon J Peacock26, Joseph Hughes27, Gaia Nebbia28, David G Partridge29, Matthew Parker30, James Richard Price4, Christine Peters31, Sunando Roy32, Luke B Snell28, Thushan I de Silva33, Emma Thomson27, Paul Flowers34, Andrew Copas1, Judith Breuer32. 1. Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 2. The Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 4. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. 5. Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom. 6. University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 7. Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 8. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom. 9. Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 10. Department of Virology and Infectious Diseases, Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom. 11. Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom. 12. St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 13. Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom. 14. Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom. 15. Research Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 16. Department of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 17. Centre for Genomic Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom. 18. MRC-University of Glasgow Centre For Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 19. Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 20. Centre for Enzyme Innovation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 21. Department of Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom. 22. Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom. 23. Advanced Pathogen Diagnostics, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 24. Department of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 25. Health Data Research UK, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 26. Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 27. MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 28. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. 29. Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom. 30. Sheffield Bioinformatics Core, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom. 31. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom. 32. Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom. 33. Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom. 34. School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Background: Viral sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 has been used for outbreak investigation, but there is limited evidence supporting routine use for infection prevention and control (IPC) within hospital settings. Methods: We conducted a prospective non-randomised trial of sequencing at 14 acute UK hospital trusts. Sites each had a 4-week baseline data-collection period, followed by intervention periods comprising 8 weeks of 'rapid' (<48h) and 4 weeks of 'longer-turnaround' (5-10 day) sequencing using a sequence reporting tool (SRT). Data were collected on all hospital onset COVID-19 infections (HOCIs; detected ≥48h from admission). The impact of the sequencing intervention on IPC knowledge and actions, and on incidence of probable/definite hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) was evaluated. Results: A total of 2170 HOCI cases were recorded from October 2020-April 2021, corresponding to a period of extreme strain on the health service, with sequence reports returned for 650/1320 (49.2%) during intervention phases. We did not detect a statistically significant change in weekly incidence of HAIs in longer-turnaround (incidence rate ratio 1.60, 95%CI 0.85-3.01; P=0.14) or rapid (0.85, 0.48-1.50; P=0.54) intervention phases compared to baseline phase. However, IPC practice was changed in 7.8% and 7.4% of all HOCI cases in rapid and longer-turnaround phases, respectively, and 17.2% and 11.6% of cases where the report was returned. In a 'per-protocol' sensitivity analysis there was an impact on IPC actions in 20.7% of HOCI cases when the SRT report was returned within 5 days. Capacity to respond effectively to insights from sequencing was breached in most sites by the volume of cases and limited resources. Conclusion: While we did not demonstrate a direct impact of sequencing on the incidence of nosocomial transmission, our results suggest that sequencing can inform IPC response to HOCIs, particularly when returned within 5 days. Funding: COG-UK is supported by funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) part of UK Research & Innovation (UKRI), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [grant code: MC_PC_19027], and Genome Research Limited, operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute. Clinical trial number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04405934.
Background: Viral sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 has been used for outbreak investigation, but there is limited evidence supporting routine use for infection prevention and control (IPC) within hospital settings. Methods: We conducted a prospective non-randomised trial of sequencing at 14 acute UK hospital trusts. Sites each had a 4-week baseline data-collection period, followed by intervention periods comprising 8 weeks of 'rapid' (<48h) and 4 weeks of 'longer-turnaround' (5-10 day) sequencing using a sequence reporting tool (SRT). Data were collected on all hospital onset COVID-19 infections (HOCIs; detected ≥48h from admission). The impact of the sequencing intervention on IPC knowledge and actions, and on incidence of probable/definite hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) was evaluated. Results: A total of 2170 HOCI cases were recorded from October 2020-April 2021, corresponding to a period of extreme strain on the health service, with sequence reports returned for 650/1320 (49.2%) during intervention phases. We did not detect a statistically significant change in weekly incidence of HAIs in longer-turnaround (incidence rate ratio 1.60, 95%CI 0.85-3.01; P=0.14) or rapid (0.85, 0.48-1.50; P=0.54) intervention phases compared to baseline phase. However, IPC practice was changed in 7.8% and 7.4% of all HOCI cases in rapid and longer-turnaround phases, respectively, and 17.2% and 11.6% of cases where the report was returned. In a 'per-protocol' sensitivity analysis there was an impact on IPC actions in 20.7% of HOCI cases when the SRT report was returned within 5 days. Capacity to respond effectively to insights from sequencing was breached in most sites by the volume of cases and limited resources. Conclusion: While we did not demonstrate a direct impact of sequencing on the incidence of nosocomial transmission, our results suggest that sequencing can inform IPC response to HOCIs, particularly when returned within 5 days. Funding: COG-UK is supported by funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) part of UK Research & Innovation (UKRI), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [grant code: MC_PC_19027], and Genome Research Limited, operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute. Clinical trial number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04405934.
Authors: Hayley Colton; Matthew D Parker; Oliver Stirrup; James Blackstone; Matthew Loose; C Patrick McClure; Sunando Roy; Charlotte Williams; Julie McLeod; Darren Smith; Yusri Taha; Peijun Zhang; Sharon Nienyun Hsu; Beatrix Kele; Kathryn Harris; Fiona Mapp; Rachel Williams; Paul Flowers; Judith Breuer; David G Partridge; Thushan I de Silva Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2022-10-10 Impact factor: 8.944