| Literature DB >> 36097524 |
Yehong Wei1, Yanxiang Sun2, Yuting Li2, Xufeng Chen3, Yingyu Wu2, Xindi Fang2, Ruichen Zhu4,5.
Abstract
Background: The problem of global aging was becoming increasingly prominent. At present, the empty nest and miniaturization of family structure reduce the function of home-based elderly care.Entities:
Keywords: Elderly people; Health care; Household income; Medical care; Questionnaire survey; Regression analysis; Related factors
Year: 2022 PMID: 36097524 PMCID: PMC9463997 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 3.061
Figure 1Basic information of the elderly.
The relationship between personal general condition and cognitive condition.
| Cognition degree | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Number | Well known | Know | Better known | Little known | Unknown | χ2 value | |
| Sex | 8.836 | 0.087 | ||||||
| Male | 167 | 16 (9.6%) | 50 (29.9%) | 51 (30.5%) | 28 (16.8%) | 22 (13.2%) | ||
| Female | 180 | 20 (11.1%) | 46 (25.6%) | 37 (20.6%) | 37(20.6%) | 40 (22.2%) | ||
| Age (years) | 43.923 | 0.000 | ||||||
| 60–65 | 130 | 17 (13.1%) | 39 (30.0%) | 38 (29.2%) | 25 (19.2%) | 11(8.5%) | ||
| 66–70 | 46 | 6 (13.0%) | 14 (30.4%) | 16 (34.8%) | 5 (10.9%) | 5 (10.9%) | ||
| 71–75 | 54 | 3 (5.6%) | 14 (25.9%) | 18 (33.3%) | 12 (22.2%) | 7 (13.0%) | ||
| 76–80 | 33 | 5 (15.2%) | 9 (27.3%) | 5 (15.2%) | 6 (18.2%) | 8 (24.2%) | ||
| >80 | 84 | 5 (6.0%) | 20 (23.8%) | 11 (13.1%) | 17 (20.2%) | 31 (36.9%) | ||
| Level of education | 65.490 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Primary school the following | 44 | 2 (4.5%) | 7 (15.9%) | 6 (13.6%) | 9 (20.5%) | 20 (45.5%) | ||
| Primary school | 52 | 1 (1.9%) | 9 (17.3%) | 17 (32.7%) | 9 (17.3%) | 16 (30.8%) | ||
| Junior high school | 69 | 9 (13.0%) | 18 (26.1%) | 12 (17.4%) | 15 (21.7%) | 15 (21.7%) | ||
| Technical secondary school | 16 | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (37.5%) | 4 (25.0%) | 5 (31.3%) | 1 (6.3%) | ||
| High school | 60 | 9 (15.0%) | 19 (31.7%) | 20 (33.3%) | 10 (16.7%) | 2 (3.3%) | ||
| Junior college | 97 | 14 (14.4%) | 34 (35.1%) | 26 (26.8%) | 16 (16.5%) | 7 (7.2%) | ||
| Bachelor degree or above | 9 | 1 (11.1%) | 3 (33.3%) | 3 (33.3%) | 1 (11.1%) | 1 (11.1%) | ||
| Household type | 28.331 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Urban residents | 239 | 29 (12.1%) | 76 (31.8%) | 63 (26.4%) | 45 (18.8%) | 26 (10.9%) | ||
| Rural farmers | 108 | 7 (6.5%) | 20 (18.5%) | 25 (23.2%) | 20 (18.5%) | 36 (33.3%) | ||
| Marital status | 32.027 | 0.012 | ||||||
| Married | 267 | 31(11.6%) | 74 (27.7%) | 71 (67.7%) | 55 (20.6%) | 36 (13.5%) | ||
| Single | 7 | 3 (42.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (28.6%) | 1 (14.3%) | 1 (14.3%) | ||
| Divorced | 61 | 1 (1.6%) | 18 (29.5%) | 12 (19.7%) | 8 (13.1%) | 22 (36.1%) | ||
| Widowed | 12 | 1 (8.3%) | 4 (33.3%) | 3 (25.0%) | 1 (8.3%) | 3 (25.0%) | ||
| Occupation before retirement | 51.861 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Enterprise employees | 91 | 14(15.4%) | 29(31.9%) | 24 (26.4%) | 19 (20.9%) | 5 (5.5%) | ||
| Civil servants | 32 | 8(25.0%) | 12(37.5%) | 4 (12.5%) | 4 (12.5%) | 4 (12.5%) | ||
| Institutions | 92 | 8(8.7%) | 28(30.4%) | 27 (29.3%) | 14 (15.2%) | 15 (16.3%) | ||
| Self-employed | 37 | 3(8.1%) | 11(29.7%) | 10 (27.0%) | 6 (16.2%) | 7 (18.9%) | ||
| Farmers | 36 | 2(5.6%) | 9(25.0%) | 9 (25.0%) | 8 (22.2%) | 8 (22.2%) | ||
| Migrant workers | 54 | 1(1.9%) | 7(13.0%) | 13 (24.1%) | 12 (22.2%) | 21 (38.9%) | ||
| Others | 5 | 0(0.0%) | 0(0.0%) | 1 (20.0%) | 2 (40.0%) | 2 (40.0%) | ||
| Medical treatment insurance | 64.252 | 0.000 | ||||||
| None | 23 | 2 (8.7%) | 3 (13.0%) | 2 (8.7%) | 8 (34.8%) | 8 (34.8%) | ||
| Commercial insurance | 34 | 5 (14.7%) | 16 (47.1%) | 9 (26.5%) | 1 (2.9%) | 3 (8.8%) | ||
| New rural cooperative | 73 | 6 (8.2%) | 12 (16.4%) | 16 (21.9%) | 11 (15.1%) | 28 (38.4%) | ||
| Urban residents medical treatment insurance | 49 | 8 (16.3%) | 10 (20.4%) | 16 (32.7%) | 24 (28.6%) | 1 (2.0%) | ||
| Town worker medical insurance | 148 | 14 (9.5%) | 49 (33.1%) | 37 (25.0%) | 27 (18.2%) | 21 (14.2%) | ||
| Endowment insurance medical insurance | 20 | 1 (5.0%) | 6 (30.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | 4 (20.0%) | 1 (5.0%) | ||
| Endowment Insurance | 27.857 | 0.020 | ||||||
| None | 53 | 3 (5.7%) | 18 (34.0%) | 18 (34.0%) | 5 (9.4%) | 9 (17.0%) | ||
| Agency institution | 117 | 17(14.5%) | 33 (28.2%) | 30 (25.6%) | 23 (19.7%) | 14 (12.0%) | ||
| Urban workers or urban and rural residents | 125 | 14(11.2%) | 29 (23.2%) | 32 (25.6%) | 27 (21.6%) | 23 (18.4%) | ||
| Land expropriated farmers | 26 | 1 (3.8%) | 4 (15.4%) | 5 (19.2%) | 6 (23.1%) | 10 (38.5%) | ||
| Business | 26 | 1 (3.8%) | 12 (46.2%) | 3 (11.5%) | 4 (15.4%) | 6 (23.1%) | ||
| Family monthly income | ||||||||
| <3,000 RMB | 46 | 3 (6.5%) | 6 (13.1%) | 3 (6.5%) | 14 (30.4%) | 20 (43.5%) | 43.312 | 0.000 |
| 3,000–5,999 RMB | 87 | 7 (8.0%) | 25 (28.7%) | 23 (26.4%) | 14 (16.1%) | 18 (20.7%) | ||
| 6,000–9,999 RMB | 110 | 12 (10.9%) | 30 (27.3%) | 37 (33.6%) | 18 (16.4%) | 13 (11.8%) | ||
| ≥10,000 RMB | 104 | 14(13.5%) | 35 (33.7%) | 25 (24.0%) | 19 (18.3%) | 11 (10.6%) | ||
Relationship between family situation and degree of support.
| Degree of support | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Number | Well supported | Support | Better supported | Little supported | Unsupported | χ2 value | |
| Monthly income | 29.919 | 0.002 | ||||||
| <3,000 RMB | 46 | 6 (13.0%) | 27 (58.7%) | 11 (23.9%) | 2 (4.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| 3,000–5,999 RMB | 87 | 19 (21.8%) | 41 (47.1%) | 26 (29.9%) | 1 (1.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| 6,000–9,999 RMB | 110 | 36 (32.7%) | 51 (46.4%) | 22 (20.0%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| ≥10,000 RMB | 104 | 38 (36.5%) | 48 (46.2%) | 14 (13.5%) | 2(1.9%) | 2 (1.9%) | ||
| Monthly fee | 57.255 | 0.007 | ||||||
| 0–999 RMB | 94 | 20 (21.3%) | 37 (39.4%) | 34 (36.2%) | 3 (3.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| 1,000–1,999 RMB | 104 | 27 (26.0%) | 65 (62.5%) | 12 (11.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| 2,000–2,999 RMB | 61 | 19 (31.1%) | 27 (44.3%) | 13 (21.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (3.3%) | ||
| 3,000–3,999 RMB | 31 | 4 (12.9%) | 17 (54.8%) | 9 (29.0%) | 1 (3.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| ≥4,000 RMB | 57 | 29 (50.9%) | 21 (36.8%) | 5 (8.8%) | 2 (3.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Degree of child support | 194.993 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Well supported | 106 | 62 (58.5%) | 32 (30.2%) | 11 (10.4%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Support | 167 | 29 (17.4%) | 104 (62.3%) | 30 (18.0%) | 3 (1.8%) | 1 (0.6%) | ||
| Better supported | 62 | 6 (9.7%) | 27 (43.5%) | 28 (45.2%) | 1 (1.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Little supported | 4 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (75.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (25.0%) | ||
| Unsupported | 1 | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
Relationship between cognitive level and support level.
| Degree of support | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Items | Number | Well supported | Support | Better supported | Little supported | Unsupported | χ2 value | |
| Know or not | 49.694 | 0.000 | ||||||
| Well known | 36 | 22 (61.1%) | 8 (22.2%) | 5 (13.9%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.8%) | ||
| Know | 96 | 37 (38.5%) | 44 (45.8%) | 13 (13.5%) | 2 (2.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Better known | 88 | 21 (23.9%) | 49 (55.7%) | 18 (20.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
| Little known | 65 | 9 (13.8%) | 32 (49.2%) | 21 (32.3%) | 2 (3.1%) | 1 (1.5%) | ||
| Unknown | 62 | 10 (16.1%) | 34 (54.8%) | 16 (25.8%) | 2 (3.2%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
Figure 2Relationship between cognitive level and support level.
Multi-factor Logistic regression analysis of the combination of medical, maintenance and health support.
| Influence factors | β |
| Wald χ2 value | 95% Confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper limit | Lower limit | |||||
| Level of education | ||||||
| Primary school the following | 0.000 | |||||
| Primary school | −0.053 | 0.389 | 0.018 | 0.892 | −0.815 | 0.709 |
| Junior high school | −0.484 | 0.390 | 1.541 | 0.214 | −1.247 | 0.280 |
| Technical secondary school | 0.200 | 0.564 | 0.126 | 0.722 | −0.906 | 1.307 |
| High school | −0.107 | 0.399 | 0.072 | 0.789 | −0.888 | 0.675 |
| Junior college | −0.352 | 0.394 | 0.797 | 0.372 | −1.124 | 0.420 |
| Bachelor degree or above | −2.576 | 0.873 | 8.697 | 0.003 | −4.287 | −0.864 |
| Household type | ||||||
| Urban residents | 0.000 | |||||
| Rural farmers | 0.642 | 0.259 | 6.127 | 0.013 | 0.134 | 1.151 |
| Occupation before retirement | ||||||
| Enterprise employees | 0.000 | |||||
| Civil servants | −0.091 | 0.389 | 0.054 | 0.816 | −0.853 | 0.671 |
| Institutions | 0.023 | 0.279 | 0.007 | 0.935 | -.525 | 0.571 |
| Self-employed | −0.218 | 0.370 | 0.346 | 0.556 | -.943 | 0.507 |
| Farmers | 0.349 | 0.373 | 0.873 | 0.350 | -.383 | 1.081 |
| Migrant workers | 0.914 | 0.331 | 7.646 | 0.006 | .266 | 1.562 |
| Others | 0.363 | 0.865 | 0.176 | 0.675 | −1.333 | 2.059 |
| Family monthly income | ||||||
| <3,000 RMB | ||||||
| 3,000–5,999 RMB | −0.081 | 0.360 | 0.051 | 0.821 | −0.787 | 0.624 |
| 6,000–9,999 RMB | −0.615 | 0.357 | 2.968 | 0.085 | −1.315 | 0.085 |
| ≥10,000 RMB | −0.778 | 0.364 | 4.563 | 0.033 | −1.492 | −0.064 |
| Know or not | ||||||
| Well known | 0.000 | |||||
| Know | 0.771 | 0.382 | 4.067 | 0.044 | 0.022 | 1.520 |
| Better known | 1.299 | 0.389 | 11.125 | 0.001 | 0.536 | 2.062 |
| Little known | 2.038 | 0.414 | 24.196 | 0.000 | 1.226 | 2.849 |
| Unknown | 1.747 | 0.415 | 17.764 | 0.000 | 0.935 | 2.560 |