| Literature DB >> 36097472 |
Ogochukwu Ann Udume1, Gideon O Abu1, Herbert O Stanley1, Ijeoma F Vincent-Akpu2, Yusuf Momoh3.
Abstract
Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) is a hydrophyte weed that causes havoc in the aquatic ecosystem as an invasive plant that can obstruct waterways and bring about nutrient imbalance. This study aims to address how this invasive hydrophyte can be physically harvested and biochemically transformed into a bioproduct that can enhance the restoration of damaged soil. Biocomposting, a low-cost biotechnological technique, was designed to degrade the lignocellulosic Eichhornia crassipes biomass and transform it into a valuable bioproduct. The process used response surface methodology (RSM) to investigate the aggregate effect of moisture content, turning frequency, and microbial isolate (Chitinophaga terrae) inoculum size on the breakdown of lignin over 21 days. The moisture content (A), (45, 55, 65) % v/w, inoculum size (B), (5, 7.5, 10)% v/v, and turning frequency (C), (1, 3, 5) days were considered independent variables, while percentage lignin degradation was considered a response variable. The optimal conditions for lignin breakdown were 65.7 percent (v/w) moisture, 7.5 percent (v/v) inoculum concentration, and 5-day interval turning. The R2 score of 0.9733 demonstrates the model's integrity and reliability. Thus, the RSM approach resulted in a fine grain dark brown Nutri-compost that proved effective in enhancing soil fertility. This procedure is recommended for a scale-up process where large quantities of the hydrophyte could be treated for conversion into Nutri compost.Entities:
Keywords: Biocomposting; Box-Behnken design; Chitinophaga terrae; Lignocellulosic waste; Nutri-compost; Optimization
Year: 2022 PMID: 36097472 PMCID: PMC9463370 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Some waste optimization methods.
| Optimization method | Compost feedstock (waste source) | Variable Factor(s) | Response factors | Findings/correlation coefficient | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-Variable-at-a-time | Municipal solid | Moisture, temperature, aeration rate, free air space | Performance of biological treatment plants | Improvement from 53% to 107%. | |
| One-Variable-at-a-time | Palm (Oil mill effluent and empty fruit branches) | Particulate size, pH, initial carbon dosage, mix ratio of substrates | Electrical conductivity, (EC) protein content, organic matter content and C/N ratio), | Increase in all response factors | |
| One-Variable-at-a-time | Medlar pruning, cattle manure | Cattle manure addition | EC, total N, and organic-matter stability | Increase in all response factors | |
| One-Variable-at-a-time | Solid waste (Biodegradable) | pH, moisture content, composting method | Thermophilic phase | Optimal thermophilic phase achieved with 60% moisture level | |
| One-Variable-at-a-time | Food | Natural zeolite, and biochar | N & heavy metals | Decrease in Conc. of heavy metals due to Zeolite affinity to cations | |
| RSM (Central Composite Design- CCD) | Municipal solid | Pyrene conc.), soil/compost mixing ratio, compost stability expressed as respiration index | Pyrene biodegradation. | R2 > 0.69 | |
| RSM (BBD) | Kitchen | 1. Fly ash and bulking agent), | Moisture, C/N | Moisture R2 = 0.9975, and C/N R2 = 0.9947. | |
| 3-Factorial BBD | Municipal solid | Aeration, moisture, C/N ratio, time | compost stability (organic matter, chemical O2 demand, nitrate concentration and biodegradability) | R2 > 0.8 | |
| Full Factorial experimental design (ANOVA- test) | Pulp and paper mill sludge | Composting time, moisture, addition of hazelnut kernels | NH4+ Removal | 60% removal of ammonium at 50% moisture,25% Kernel in 5 weeks | |
| Full factorial design (statistical) | Papermill (sludge), corn | Process duration, Cornhusk, corn cob, moisture, material ratio | NH4+ Removal | 91.84% removal of ammonia | |
| Factorial optimization | cattle dung with maize/silage and peach-juice pulp | pH, C/N ratio, and moisture content | Optimal composting conditions. by Dewar autothermal assay | R2 = 0.8. | |
| Radial basis functional (RBF) neural network model | Agricultural | Volatile solids, BOD (soluble) and CO2 evolution | ideal agro-waste composting mix proportion | (R2 = 0.99) Achieved with Vegetable waste, cow manure, and sawdust. (62.0 kg, 17.0 kg, and 9.0 kg respectively) |
Factor and rates (levels/range) considered in BBD.
| Factor/Symbol | Rates | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| -1 (low) | 0 (centre) | 1 (high) | |
| %Moisture Content v/w | 45 | 55 | 65 |
| Turning frequency (day) | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Inoculum size v/w | 5 | 7.5 | 10 |
BBD coding for three independent factors/actual and predicted lignin value.
| Standard | Runs | Moisture content% | Inoculum size% | Turning Frequency | Actual Lignin Value (%) | Predicted Lignin Value (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code | value | code | value | code | value | ||||
| 11 | 1 | 0 | 55 | -1 | 5 | +1 | 5 | 8.64 | 8.39 |
| 2 | 2 | +1 | 65 | -1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8.85 | 8.86 |
| 7 | 3 | -1 | 45 | 0 | 7.5 | +1 | 5 | 7.20 | 7.02 |
| 15 | 4 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 7.5 | 0 | 3 | 14.64 | 14.25 |
| 9 | 5 | 0 | 55 | -1 | 5 | -1 | 1 | 8.73 | 8.54 |
| 1 | 6 | -1 | 45 | -1 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8.02 | 8.45 |
| 6 | 7 | +1 | 65 | 0 | 7.5 | -1 | 1 | 7.19 | 7.37 |
| 3 | 8 | -1 | 45 | +1 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 8.49 | 8.48 |
| 5 | 9 | -1 | 45 | 0 | 7.5 | -1 | 1 | 7.57 | 7.33 |
| 13 | 10 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 7.5 | 0 | 3 | 13.62 | 14.25 |
| 10 | 11 | 0 | 55 | +1 | 10 | -1 | 1 | 8.13 | 8.38 |
| 12 | 12 | 0 | 55 | +1 | 10 | +1 | 5 | 7.93 | 8.12 |
| 4 | 13 | +1 | 65 | +1 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 8.81 | 8.38 |
| 8 | 14 | +1 | 65 | 0 | 7.5 | +1 | 5 | 7.04 | 7.28 |
| 17 | 15 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 7.5 | 0 | 3 | 14.06 | 14.25 |
| 14 | 16 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 7.5 | 0 | 3 | 14.70 | 14.25 |
| 16 | 17 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 7.5 | 0 | 3 | 14.22 | 14.25 |
| 11 | control | - | - | - | - | ||||
Variance predictions over the whole design are indicated by the center points occurring thrice.
Figure 1A phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA sequence of Chitinophaga terrae.
Figure 2a: Changes in the lignin content over the experiment period. b: Actual and Predicted Values of lignin content in the Experimental runs.
Response surface model ANOVA.
| Source | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom (Df) | Mean square | F-value | Probability greater than an F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Lignin | ||||||
| Residual model | 1.53 | 7 | 0.1971 | |||
| Pure error | 0.7885 | 4 | 0.1971 | |||
| Lack of fit | 0.7421 | 3 | 0.2474 | 1.25 | 0.4015 | Not significant |
| Total correlation | 141.33 | 16 |
R2 - 0.9892, Adjusted R2- 0.9752, Predicted R2- 0.9073, Adequate precision 20.1612.
Model Coefficient for lignin degradation.
| Factor | Coefficient estimate | Standard error | F-value | Probability greater than F(P-value) | Degree of freedom | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lignin | ||||||
| β 0 | 14.25 | 0.2091 | 71.04 | <0.0001 | 9 | significant |
| β1 (A) | 0.0762 | 0.1653 | 0.2127 | 0.6586 | 1 | |
| β2 (B) | -0.1100 | 0.1653 | 0.4427 | 0.5271 | 1 | |
| β 3 (C) | -0.1013 | 0.1653 | 0.3751 | 0.5596 | 1 | |
| β 11 (A2) | -3.41 | 0.2279 | 223.46 | <0.0001 | 1 | significant |
| β22 (B2) | -2.30 | 0.2279 | 101.78 | <0.0001 | 1 | Significant |
| β33 (C2) | -3.59 | 0.2279 | 248.39 | <0.0001 | 1 | Significant |
| β12 (AB) | -0.1275 | 0.2338 | 0.2974 | 0.6025 | 1 | |
| β13 (AC) | 0.0550 | 0.2338 | 0.0553 | 0.8208 | 1 | |
| β23 (BC) | -0.0275 | 0.2338 | 0.0138 | 0.9097 | 1 | |
A, B, and C are the linear coefficients.
AB, AC, and BC are quadratic coefficients. A2, B2, and C2 are the regression terms for interaction outcome coefficients.
Df = free-to-vary values.
A is Moisture, B is Inoculum size, and C is Turning frequency.
Figure 3(a) 3D and contour plots demonstrate the interaction of inoculum size and moisture; (b) 3D and contour plots demonstrate interactions between turning frequency and moisture; 3(c) 3D and contour plots demonstrate the interaction of turning frequency and inoculum size.
Figure 4Microbial abundance in optimized compost (OC) at Phylum Level.