| Literature DB >> 36097465 |
Jing Xian Quah1,2, Evan Jenkins3, Dhani Dharmaprani1,3, Kathryn Tiver2, Corey Smith4, Teresa Hecker2, Majo X Joseph2, Joseph B Selvanayagam2, Matthew Tung5, Tony Stanton5,6, Waheed Ahmad7, Nik Stoyanov4, Anandaroop Lahiri2, Fahd Chahadi2, Cameron Singleton2, Anand Ganesan1,2.
Abstract
Background: Interatrial conduction has been postulated to play an important role in atrial fibrillation (AF). The pathways involved in interatrial conduction during AF remain incompletely defined. Objective: We recently showed physiological assessment of fibrillatory dynamics could be performed using renewal theory, which determines rates of phase singularity formation (λf) and destruction (λd). Using the renewal approach, we aimed to understand the role of the interatrial septum and other electrically coupled regions during AF. Method: RENEWAL-AF is a prospective multicenter observational study recruiting AF ablation patients (ACTRN 12619001172190). We studied unipolar electrograms obtained from 16 biatrial locations prior to ablation using a 16-electrode Advisor HD Grid catheter. Renewal rate constants λf and λd were calculated, and the relationships between these rate constants in regions of interatrial connectivity were examined.Entities:
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Bachmann’s bundle; Interatrial conduction; Interatrial septum; Renewal theory
Year: 2022 PMID: 36097465 PMCID: PMC9463713 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 ISSN: 2666-5018
Figure 1Introduction to renewal theory. (1) Renewal theory is based on the presence of unstable reentrant circuits, currently believed to be spiral waves in atrial fibrillation (AF). (2) The intervals between phase singularity (PS) formation events and the lifetimes of PS are measured, and distributions for these constructed. (3) These have been shown to be statistically independent and to form exponential distributions, implying a constant rate of PS formation (which we call λf and λd). The hypothesis evaluated in this study was that anatomically connected biatrial regions would show a linear correlation between λf and λd.
Figure 2λf and λd were determined as follows: (1) Unipolar electrograms in atrial fibrillation were sampled preablation in 16 predefined biatrial segments (1-minute recordings) with an Advisor HD Grid catheter (Abbott Cardiovascular, Plymouth, MN). Phase movies were created (2), and renewal rate constants were calculated for formation and destruction (3).
Patient baseline demographics
| Baseline demographics (N = 41 patients) | Mean (SD) or n [%] |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 59.1 (9.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 31.2 (4.4) |
| Sex, female | 12 [28.5] |
| Diabetes mellitus | 3 [7] |
| Hypertension | 17 [40.5] |
| Vascular disease | 8 [19.5] |
| Hyperlipidemia | 13 [31] |
| OSA | 14 [34] |
| Heart failure | 17 [41.5] |
| CVA | 6 [14] |
| Smoking history | 10 [23.8] |
| Alcohol intake | 27 [64.3] |
| Alcohol standard drinks/week | 5.7 (11.7) |
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 1.9 (1.5) |
| Paroxysmal AF | 17 [41] |
| LVEF | 57.5% (10.0%) |
| LAVi, mL/m2 | 42.9 (8.5) |
Data presented as mean (standard deviation) or n [%].
AF = atrial fibrillation, BMI = body mass index; CVA = cerebrovascular accident; LAVi = left atrial volume index; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; OSA = obstructive sleep apnea.
Figure 3Interseptal conduction showed a positive linear correlation between the right and left side of the interatrial septum, an effect that was diminished in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). PS = phase singularity.
Degree and significance, in descending order, of correlations between λf of measured right atrial locations with mean left atrial λf
| λf values of measured RA locations | Correlation with mean LA λf |
|---|---|
| CTI | r2 = 0.75, |
| Septal RA | r2 = 0.6, |
| Lateral RA | r2 = 0.5, |
| RAA | r2 = 0.34, |
| SVC-RA junction | r2 = 0.32, |
| Posterior RA | r2 = 0.11, |
CTI = cavotricuspid isthmus; LA = left atrial; RA = right atrial; RAA = right atrial appendage; SVC = superior vena cava.
Degree and significance, in descending order, of correlations between λd of measured right atrial locations with mean left atrial λd
| λd values of measured RA locations | Correlation with mean LA λd |
|---|---|
| CTI | r2 = 0.76, |
| Septal RA | r2 = 0.58, |
| RAA | r2 = 0.52, |
| SVC-RA junction | r2 = 0.49, |
| Lateral RA | r2 = 0.45, |
| Posterior RA | r2 = 0.12, |
CTI = cavotricuspid isthmus; LA = left atrial; RA = right atrial; RAA = right atrial appendage; SVC = superior vena cava.
Degree and significance of correlations between λf of measured right atrial locations with mean left atrial λf, according to the paroxysmal-persistent atrial fibrillation classification
| λf values of measured RA locations | Correlation with mean LA λf: paroxysmal AF (n = 18) | Correlation with mean LA λf: persistent AF (n=23) |
|---|---|---|
| CTI | r2 = 0.8, | r2 = 0.54, |
| Septal RA | r2 = 0.78, | r2 = 0.22, |
| Lateral RA | r2 = 0.5, | r2 = 0.1, |
| RAA | r2 = 0.3, | r2 = 0.38, |
| SVC-RA junction | r2 = 0.4, | r2 = 0.26, |
| Posterior RA | r2 = 0.04, | r2 = 0.37, |
CTI = cavotricuspid isthmus; LA = left atrial; RA = right atrial; RAA = right atrial appendage; SVC = superior vena cava.