Literature DB >> 36097463

Impact of optimal septal pacing with a novel catheter delivery system.

Junji Morita1, Yusuke Kondo2, Yusuke Morita1,3, Takayuki Kitai1, Tsutomu Fujita1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apical pacing; Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Physiological pacing; QRS duration; Septal pacing

Year:  2022        PMID: 36097463      PMCID: PMC9463684          DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2        ISSN: 2666-5018


× No keyword cloud information.
Selectra 3D (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) is a newly developed catheter-based lead delivery system that allows accurate lead placement in RV septal pacing. RV pacing with Selectra 3D had a shorter QRS duration and RWPT and higher ratio of RPP-CS than that with a normal stylet. The Selectra 3D system can be useful in providing a fast and effective way to achieve physiological pacing in pacemaker patients when compared with standard stylet-guided pacing alone. The usefulness of septal pacing is still unknown. A previous study reported that 8% of fluoroscopy-guided lead placements in the ventricular septum were inadvertently placed in the free wall. Another study demonstrated that when the lead was placed in the septum using a catheter delivery system (SelectSecure lead Model 3830 and C315 HIS catheter, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), right ventricular (RV) septal pacing achieved retrograde conduction through the cardiac conduction system and a short QRS duration (≤132 ms) significantly associated with left ventricular synchrony. Selectra 3D (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) is a recently developed catheter-based lead delivery system with 2 perpendicular curves. A standard septal placement can be achieved quickly and efficiently with the Selectra 3D system, which has a nondeflectable sheath consisting of 3 different variant sizes. The Selectra 3D Sheath is used for standard septal pacing, as opposed to deep septal pacing within the left bundle or at the level of the HIS. The most notable difference from the C315 HIS catheter is its 7.3F inner diameter and the use of conventional leads with the stylet lumen. In this study, we compared the QRS complex between Selectra 3D standard septal pacing and stylet-driven apical pacing. This retrospective observational study included 72 consecutive patients who had undergone pacemaker implantation by 2 operators at our hospital between November 2020 and December 2021. The implantation was performed with either the Selectra 3D (n = 31) or a stylet (n = 41). The method of using Selectra 3D has been described previously. In the stylet group, the lead was implanted in the RV apex under fluoroscopic guidance. An active lead fixation was used in both groups. We assessed the electrocardiographic (ECG) configuration and lead data. This paced QRS morphology as retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system (RPP-CS) comprising wide and narrow components in the early and late phases, respectively. Thoracic computed tomography was performed in all patients during the follow-up period and was evaluated by a cardiologist, who was blinded to the method of lead implantation. This study was approved by the institutional review board and followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients provided written informed consent. There was no difference in preoperative QRS duration between the 2 groups (Table 1). The postoperative QRS duration was significantly shorter and the postoperative QRS difference was significantly lower in the Selectra 3D group than in the stylet group (duration: 136 vs 155 ms, P <.0001; difference: 28 vs 47 ms, P = .0003). R-wave peak times (RWPTs) in leads Ⅰ and V6 were significantly shorter in the Selectra 3D group compared with those in the stylet group (lead I: 88 vs 98 ms, P <.043; lead V6: 81 vs 97 ms, P <.007). The proportion of patients with short QRS duration (≤132 ms) was significantly higher in the Selectra 3D group than in the stylet group (52% vs 10 %, P = .0001). There was no difference in R-wave amplitude or threshold between groups, whereas impedance was significantly higher in the Selectra 3D group (625 vs 565 Ω, P = .026). RPP-CS was observed in 18 cases (58%) of the Selectra 3D group. No complications including perforation or dislodgment occurred in either group.
Table 1

Comparison between Selectra 3D and stylet groups undergoing RV pacing

All patients (n = 72)Selectra 3D (n = 31)Stylet (n = 41)P value
Patient characteristics
 Age (y)80 ± 979 ± 1080 ± 8.65
 Height (cm)157 ± 10159 ± 9155 ± 11.29
 Body weight (kg)57 ± 1256 ± 1259 ± 12.48
 Male36 (50)18 (58)18 (44).31
 Sinus node dysfunction31 (43)15 (48)16 (39).43
 Atrioventricular block37 (51)14 (45)23 (56).36
 AF with slow ventricular conduction4 (6)2 (6)2 (5)1
 Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)67 ± 668 ± 666 ± 6.17
 Hypertension33 (46)15 (48)18 (44).84
 Diabetes14 (19)6 (19)8 (20)1
 Coronary artery disease11 (15)3 (10)8 (20).29
 Valvular heart disease8 (11)3 (10)5 (12)1
Results of procedure
 Size of Selectra 3D
 Selectra 3D 40-S1 (1)1 (1)
 Selectra 3D 55-M3 (4)3 (10)
 Selectra 3D 65-L27 (38)27 (87)
 Septal pacing via CT35 (49)31 (100)4 (10)<.0001
 Attempts to achieve ideal position1.23 ± 0.61.31 ± 0.61.19 ± 0.5.39
 Time of RV lead implantation (min)7.3 ± 2.98.1 ± 3.96.8 ± 1.6.059
 Total fluoroscopy time of pacemaker implantation (min)13 ± 8.415 ± 7.812 ± 9.2.25
 R-wave amplitude (mV)8.0 ± 3.88.0 ± 0.78.1 ± 1.0.93
 Impedance (Ω)601 ± 92625 ± 74565 ± 115.026
 Threshold (V)0.71 ± 0.240.73 ± 0.270.69 ± 0.19.64
 Pre QRS (ms)108 ± 25108 ± 28107 ± 22.96
 Post QRS (ms)146 ± 18136 ± 23155 ± 14<.0001
 Δ QRS (ms)39 ± 2028 ± 2347 ± 20.0003
 Short QRS duration (≤132 ms)20 (28)16 (52)4 (10).0001
 RPP-CS28 (39)18 (58)10 (24).004
 R-wave peak time in lead Ⅰ (ms)93 ± 1888 ± 1798 ± 19.043
 R-wave peak time in lead V6 (ms)89 ± 2081 ± 2297 ± 19.007

Values are given as mean ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

AF = atrial fibrillation; CT = computed tomography; RPP-CS = retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system; RV = right ventricle.

Comparison between Selectra 3D and stylet groups undergoing RV pacing Values are given as mean ± SD or n (%) unless otherwise indicated. AF = atrial fibrillation; CT = computed tomography; RPP-CS = retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system; RV = right ventricle. The main finding of this study was that RV pacing with Selectra 3D had a shorter QRS duration and RWPT and higher ratio of RPP-CS than that with a normal stylet, without any difference in R-wave amplitude, threshold, or complications between the 2 groups. Jastrzębski et al reported that utilizing the conduction system makes RWPT shorter. Our study suggests that septal pacing with Selectra 3D is expected to provide novel physiological pacing because of the short QRS duration and RWPT and higher ratio of RPP-CS compared to stylet-guided pacing. His-bundle pacing is recommended for patients with moderately reduced cardiac function and atrioventricular block. However, His-bundle pacing has limitations, including threshold, low success rate, lack of long-term data, and lack of reports on the safety of removal. Septal pacing with Selectra 3D can obviate problems of His-bundle pacing resulting from the use of conventional leads. In conclusion, Selectra 3D system can be useful in providing a fast and effective way to achieve physiological pacing via standard septal pacing in pacemaker patients compared with traditional stylet-driven lead placement alone.
  5 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of lead tip position confirmed via computed tomography in patients with right ventricular septal pacing.

Authors:  Masayuki Hattori; Yoshihisa Naruse; Yasushi Oginosawa; Yuya Matsue; Yuichi Hanaki; Shinya Kowase; Kenji Kurosaki; Akira Mizukami; Ritsuko Kohno; Haruhiko Abe; Kazutaka Aonuma; Akihiko Nogami
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Electrocardiographic characterization of non-selective His-bundle pacing: validation of novel diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Marek Jastrzębski; Paweł Moskal; Karol Curila; Kamil Fijorek; Piotr Kukla; Agnieszka Bednarek; Grzegorz Kiełbasa; Adam Bednarski; Adrian Baranchuk; Danuta Czarnecka
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 5.214

3.  Retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system as an alternative approach of his-bundle pacing: Retrograde penetration pacing into the conduction system.

Authors:  Kohei Ishibashi; Kenichiro Yamagata; Keisuke Kiso; Yoshifumi Nouno; Nobuhiko Ueda; Kenzaburo Nakajima; Tsukasa Kamakura; Mitsuru Wada; Yuko Inoue; Koji Miyamoto; Satoshi Nagase; Takashi Noda; Takeshi Aiba; Kengo Kusano
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Michael Glikson; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Mads Brix Kronborg; Yoav Michowitz; Angelo Auricchio; Israel Moshe Barbash; José A Barrabés; Giuseppe Boriani; Frieder Braunschweig; Michele Brignole; Haran Burri; Andrew J S Coats; Jean-Claude Deharo; Victoria Delgado; Gerhard-Paul Diller; Carsten W Israel; Andre Keren; Reinoud E Knops; Dipak Kotecha; Christophe Leclercq; Béla Merkely; Christoph Starck; Ingela Thylén; José Maria Tolosana
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Septal pacing using an inner guiding catheter without an outer sheath: A case series.

Authors:  Yusuke Morita; Junji Morita; Yusuke Kondo; Takayuki Kitai; Tsutomu Fujita; Kazuaki Tanabe
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2021-12-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.