SIGNIFICANCE: The dewetting process of contact lenses (CLs) is a result of material and solution properties as well as environmental factors. This article describes an investigational approach to observe and describe dewetting characteristics of different CL material and solution combinations. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the in vitro dewetting characteristics of various daily disposable CLs that were assessed using a noninvasive keratograph dewetting procedure (noninvasive keratograph dry-up time). In vitro dewetting data of the same CL materials soaked in saline solution and artificial tear solution (ATS) were measured to determine additional dewetting characteristics. METHODS: Noninvasive keratograph dry-up time was measured for six different soft CL materials and three different test conditions, in their specific blister solution, after exposure to saline and an ATS. Twenty CLs of each solution/material combination were assessed after an 8-hour soaking, during a 180-second dewetting observation, and the results were expressed by area under the curve values. RESULTS: Fastest dewetting occurred for all materials when measured out of saline, indicated by the highest averaged area under the curve value of 9243.3 ± 38.3 over all lens materials. Slower dewetting was detected for all materials when measured out of their specific blister solution (7755.9 ± 37.1) and out of ATS (7988.8 ± 40.0). Intragroup results were statistically significantly different for all solutions showing the smallest differences within the ATS group ( P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: A pure saline thin film is not an ideal representation of a complex tear film layer of a healthy human because it lacks any evaporative protection by a lipid layer. The use of an ATS, which more likely mimics the natural tear film, allowed in this experimental in vitro project to decrease the gap to the in vivo field. In vitro dewetting information in connection with the blister solution allows only a theoretical conclusion about the initial lens wear after lens insertion.
SIGNIFICANCE: The dewetting process of contact lenses (CLs) is a result of material and solution properties as well as environmental factors. This article describes an investigational approach to observe and describe dewetting characteristics of different CL material and solution combinations. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the in vitro dewetting characteristics of various daily disposable CLs that were assessed using a noninvasive keratograph dewetting procedure (noninvasive keratograph dry-up time). In vitro dewetting data of the same CL materials soaked in saline solution and artificial tear solution (ATS) were measured to determine additional dewetting characteristics. METHODS: Noninvasive keratograph dry-up time was measured for six different soft CL materials and three different test conditions, in their specific blister solution, after exposure to saline and an ATS. Twenty CLs of each solution/material combination were assessed after an 8-hour soaking, during a 180-second dewetting observation, and the results were expressed by area under the curve values. RESULTS: Fastest dewetting occurred for all materials when measured out of saline, indicated by the highest averaged area under the curve value of 9243.3 ± 38.3 over all lens materials. Slower dewetting was detected for all materials when measured out of their specific blister solution (7755.9 ± 37.1) and out of ATS (7988.8 ± 40.0). Intragroup results were statistically significantly different for all solutions showing the smallest differences within the ATS group ( P < .001, Kruskal-Wallis test). CONCLUSIONS: A pure saline thin film is not an ideal representation of a complex tear film layer of a healthy human because it lacks any evaporative protection by a lipid layer. The use of an ATS, which more likely mimics the natural tear film, allowed in this experimental in vitro project to decrease the gap to the in vivo field. In vitro dewetting information in connection with the blister solution allows only a theoretical conclusion about the initial lens wear after lens insertion.
Authors: M Saad Bhamla; Chew Chai; Noelle I Rabiah; John M Frostad; Gerald G Fuller Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Chau-Minh Phan; Hendrik Walther; Richard W Smith; Donald Riederer; Charis Lau; Kathrine Osborn Lorenz; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Lyndon Jones Journal: J Biomater Sci Polym Ed Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 3.517
Authors: Holly Lorentz; Miriam Heynen; Lise M M Kay; Claudia Yvette Dominici; Warda Khan; Wendy W S Ng; Lyndon Jones Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2011-12-24 Impact factor: 2.367