Hossein Babaahmadi Rezaei1, Alireza Kheirolah2, Faezeh Seif1,3. 1. Hyperlipidemia Research Center, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 2. Department of Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. 3. Department of Basic Sciences, Shoushtar Faculty of Medical Sciences, Shoushtar, Iran.
Abstract
<strong>Objective:</strong> In addition to the carboxy region, Smad2 transcription factor can be phosphorylated in the linker region as<br />well. Phosphorylation of Smad2 linker region (Smad2L) promotes the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type<br />1 (PAI-1) which leads to cardiovascular disorders such as atherosclerosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of dual transactivation of EGF and TGF-β receptors in phosphorylation of Smad2L and protein expression of PAI-1 induced by endothelin-1 (ET-1) in bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs). In addition, as an intermediary of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, the functions of ROCK and PLC were investigated in dual transactivation pathways.<br /><strong>Materials and Methods: </strong> The experimental study is an in vitro study performed on BAECs. Proteins were investigated<br />by western blotting using protein-specific antibodies against phospho-Smad2 linker region residues (Ser245/250/255),<br />phospho-Smad2 carboxy residues (465/467), ERK1/(Thr202/Thr204), and PAI-1.<br /><strong> Results: </strong> TGF (2 ng/ml), EGF (100 ng/ml) and ET-1 (100 nM) induced the phosphorylation of Smad2L. This response was<br />blocked in the presence of AG1478 (EGFR antagonists), SB431542 (TGFR inhibitor), and Y27632 (Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK antagonist). Moreover, ET-1-increased protein expression of PAI-1 was decreased in the presence of bosentan (ET receptor inhibitor), AG1478, SB431542, and Y27632.<br /><strong> Conclusion: </strong> The results indicated that ET-1 increases the phosphorylation of Smad2L and protein expression of PAI-1<br />via induced the transactivation pathways of EGFR and TGFR. This study is the first attempt to scrutinize the significant role of ROCK in the protein expression of PAI-1.
<strong>Objective:</strong> In addition to the carboxy region, Smad2 transcription factor can be phosphorylated in the linker region as<br />well. Phosphorylation of Smad2 linker region (Smad2L) promotes the expression of plasminogen activator inhibitor type<br />1 (PAI-1) which leads to cardiovascular disorders such as atherosclerosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of dual transactivation of EGF and TGF-β receptors in phosphorylation of Smad2L and protein expression of PAI-1 induced by endothelin-1 (ET-1) in bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs). In addition, as an intermediary of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, the functions of ROCK and PLC were investigated in dual transactivation pathways.<br /><strong>Materials and Methods: </strong> The experimental study is an in vitro study performed on BAECs. Proteins were investigated<br />by western blotting using protein-specific antibodies against phospho-Smad2 linker region residues (Ser245/250/255),<br />phospho-Smad2 carboxy residues (465/467), ERK1/(Thr202/Thr204), and PAI-1.<br /><strong> Results: </strong> TGF (2 ng/ml), EGF (100 ng/ml) and ET-1 (100 nM) induced the phosphorylation of Smad2L. This response was<br />blocked in the presence of AG1478 (EGFR antagonists), SB431542 (TGFR inhibitor), and Y27632 (Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK antagonist). Moreover, ET-1-increased protein expression of PAI-1 was decreased in the presence of bosentan (ET receptor inhibitor), AG1478, SB431542, and Y27632.<br /><strong> Conclusion: </strong> The results indicated that ET-1 increases the phosphorylation of Smad2L and protein expression of PAI-1<br />via induced the transactivation pathways of EGFR and TGFR. This study is the first attempt to scrutinize the significant role of ROCK in the protein expression of PAI-1.
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a strong vasoconstrictor peptide that is synthesized by endothelial
cells ,probably causing the promotion of endothelial dysfunction (1-4). The effect of ET-1
is exerted through G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): ETA and ETB
(5). GPCR family is the biggest group of cell surface receptors participating in a number of
physiological or pathological circumstances (6). Therefore, understanding the different
dimensions of GPCR signaling is essential for therapeutic purposes. GPCRs-driven signaling
pathways include the classic pathway via direct binding of ligand to GPCR on the cell
membrane leading to activation of heterotrimeric G proteins and multiple signaling pathways.
In recent years, transactivation pathways of protein tyrosine kinase receptors (PTK) such as
epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as well as protein serine/threonine kinase
receptors (PS/TK) like transforming growth factor receptor (TGFR) have been identified as
part of the GPCR signaling (7-9). Recent studies have demonstrated that different GPCR
agonists such as thrombin, ET-1, and AngII can contribute to transactivation of EGFR and
TGFR (10-12). According to our previous study, it has been determined that ET-1 results in
TGFR transactivation endothelial cells (13).TGFβ receptors are a group of serine/threonine kinase
receptors whose biological roles are performed by type I
and type II receptor complexes (ALK5). TGF-β signaling
is launched by interaction of a ligand to the TβRII/type
I heterogenic complex leading to phosphorylation of the
carboxy region of Smad proteins (14). Smad proteins
are transcriptional factors that play a serious role in the
TGFβ-superfamily signals (15, 16). The Smads have
three distinct regions: two conserved regions including
N-terminal (MH1) and C-terminal (MH2) regions, and
one non-conserved region -linker region- that links
MH1 and MH2 regions. Besides the carboxy region,
the linker region can be phosphorylated as well (16-
18). In the Smad-dependent TGF-β signaling pathway,
phosphorylation of C-terminal region occurs immediately
by binding of TGF-β to the cell surface receptor. However, in non-Smad signaling, phosphorylation of Smad2 linker
region (Smad2L) occurs indirectly by an activated serine/
threonine kinase such as ERK1⁄ 2, p38, or JNK. Recent
studies have shown that in addition to TGF-β, GPCR
agonists result in phosphorylation of Smad2Lwhich
can play a significant part in regulation of Smad’s
function (14). Phosphorylation of Smad2L increases the
expression of proteoglycan synthesizing genes. It has
been demonstrated that TGF-β/Smad pathway increases
plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) expression
in different cell types (19, 20). PAI-1 is a member of the
superfamily of serine-protease inhibitors (serpin) that may
cause vascular disorders such as endothelial dysfunction
(21, 22). Studies have shown that growth factors such
as TNF-α, TGF, GPCR agonists such as thrombin, and
angiotensin II can lead to increased mRNA expression of
PAI-1 (16, 21, 23). In 1996, it was shown for the first time
that angiotensin II (Ang II) can induce transactivation
pathways. Subsequently, some comprehensive researches
have focused on understanding the underlying mechanism
of transactivation pathway in different cell types. However,
the details of this pathway and the signaling molecules
that participate in transactivation pathways induced by
ET-1 are not very clear in bovine aortic endothelial cells
(BAECs). Therefore, in the current study and for the first
time, not only the role of dual transactivation pathways
induced by ET-1 were evaluated in phosphorylation of
Smad2L and PAI-1 expressions in BAECs, but also the role
of ROCK assessed in the ET-1 induced PAI-1 expression.
Materials and Methods
This experimental study was approved by the Ethics
Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical
Sciences (IRAJUMS.REC.1396.1.4). fetal bovine serum
(FBS), penicillin-streptomycin solution, and low glucose
(1 g/lL) Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)
were obtained from Gibco (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA,
USA). EGF, ET-1, Y27632, AG1478, SB431542, and
neomycin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis,
MO, USA). Recombinant transforming growth factor-β,
HRP anti-rabbit IgG-peroxidase antibody produced in goat,
anti-phospho-Smad2L (ser245/250/255) rabbit polyclonal
antibody, anti-phospho-Smad2C (ser465/467) rabbit
polyclonal antibody, anti-phospho-ERK1/2(The202/204),
PAI-1 antibody, and GAPDH were purchased from Cell
Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA).
Cell culture
Bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC) were gifted
by Professor Peter J Little (School of Pharmacy, The
University of Queensland, Australia). BAECs were
cultured according to a previously-described procedure
(13). In brief, the cells were cultivated in DMEM with 1
g/l glucose containing 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic; and
when cells reached about 80 % confluence, they were
pretreated with specific inhibitors in certain intervals.
In the next step, ET-1 was added to the culture medium.
BAECs were incubated with TGFβ (2 ng/ml) for 1 hour
and with EGF (100 ng/ml) for 5 minutes, once alone
and once in combination with each other (13, 24). To
investigate the effects of ET-1 on phosphorylation of
Smad2L, the BAECs were treated with ET-1 (100 nM),
and then harvested at 5 and 15 minutes, 2, 4, and 8 hours
intervals. In order to evaluate Smad2C phosphorylation,
BAECs were treated with ET-1 (100 nM) and harvested
at 1, 2, and 4 hours intervals (13). In order to evaluate
ERK phosphorylation, BAECs were treated with ET-1
(100 nM) and were subsequently harvested at 5, 15 and
30 minutes, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours intervals (25). The effects
of SB431542 (10 μM for 30 minutes) and AG1474 (10
μM for 30 minutes) (24) inhibitors on pSmad2L were
tested by pretreating the cells with them. Thereafter,
ET-1 (100 nM) was added to the culture medium. The
neomycin (100 μM for 1 hour) (26) and Y27632 (10 μM
for 30 minutes) (13) inhibitors were tested on pSmad2L
via pre-incubation of the cells prior to addition of ET-1
(100 nM) to the culture medium. To investigate the effects
of ET-1 on protein expression of PAI-1, the BAECs were
treated with ET-1 (100 nM) and then harvested at 30
minutes, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours intervals (13). The effects of
SB431542 (10 μM for 30 minutes) (18) and AG1474 (10
μM for 30 minutes) (24) inhibitors on protein expression
of PAI-1 were tested by pretreating the cells with them
prior to adding ET-1 (100 nM) to the culture medium.
The neomycin (100 μM for 1 hours) (26) and Y27632 (10
μM for 30 minutes) (13) inhibitors were tested on protein
expression of PAI-1 via preincubation of the cells prior
to addition of ET-1 (100 nM) to the culture medium. The
cells were harvested after 4 hours.
Western blot
Proteins were determined using the method of Seif et
al. (4). Briefly, harvested cells were lysed in RIPA buffer.
Then, the proteins were separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and
transferred to a membrane (PVDF). After blocking steps,
the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies.
The membranes were washed and then exposed with
a secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated to
horseradish peroxidase. The labeled antibodies were
detected with chemiluminescence exposure.
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as mean ± SEM
of three individual experiments. Statistical
significance was estimated by one-way ANOVA,
followed by the least significant difference posthoc analysis (LSD). P˂0.05 or P˂0.01 considered
as statistically significant. Fold change was
calculated by dividing all the measured values
from the intensity of each area by their controls
(for both target and internal control). The areas
were obtained using Image J software program.
Then, the values of target groups were divided
by the values of their control. Graph Pad Prism
software program was used for drawing the
graphs.
Results
TGF and EGF induced Smad2L phosphorylation in
BAEC
To investigate the role of TGFβ and EGF in
phosphorylation of Smad2L (ser245/250/255), BAECs
were incubated with TGFβ (2 ng/ml) and EGF (100
ng/ml) for 1 hour and 5 minutes, respectively, once
alone and once in combination with each other. TGFβ
(P<0.05) and EGF (P<0.05) stimulated Smad2L
phosphorylation, and the effects of combination of TGF
and EGF could be additive to Smad2L phosphorylation
(P<0.01, Fig .1). This data demonstrates that both
EGF and TGFβ are individually involved in the
phosphorylation of Smad2L through two distinct
pathways.
Fig 1
TGFβ and EGF lead to phosphorylation of Smad2L. BAECs were incubated with TGFβ (2 ng/ml) and EGF (100 ng/ml) for 1 hour and 5
minutes, respectively. Values are presented as mean ± SEM of three
individual experiments. TGFβ; Transforming growth factor beta, EGF;
Epidermal growth factor, *; P<0.05, and **; P<0.01 vs. untreated.
TGFβ and EGF lead to phosphorylation of Smad2L. BAECs were incubated with TGFβ (2 ng/ml) and EGF (100 ng/ml) for 1 hour and 5
minutes, respectively. Values are presented as mean ± SEM of three
individual experiments. TGFβ; Transforming growth factor beta, EGF;
Epidermal growth factor, *; P<0.05, and **; P<0.01 vs. untreated.
ET-1 stimulated Smad2L phosphorylation in BAECs
The effects of ET-1 on phosphorylation of Smad2L
(ser245/250/255) were investigated in different
times. BAECs were exposed to ET-1 (100 nM) and
phosphorylation of Smad2L measured in a period of 5
minutes to 8 hours. ET-1 induced the phosphorylation
of Smad2L (ser245/250/255) (P<0.01, Fig .2). This
result showed that ET-1 strongly stimulates Smad2L
phosphorylation in BAEC.
Fig 2
ET-1 stimulates the phosphorylation of Smad2L. BAECs were
incubated with ET-1 (100 nM) for periods of 5 minutes up to 8 hours.
Values are presented as mean + SEM of three individual experiments. ET1; Endothelin-1, **; P<0.01 vs. untreated, min; Minutes, and h; Hours.
ET-1 stimulates the phosphorylation of Smad2L. BAECs were
incubated with ET-1 (100 nM) for periods of 5 minutes up to 8 hours.
Values are presented as mean + SEM of three individual experiments. ET1; Endothelin-1, **; P<0.01 vs. untreated, min; Minutes, and h; Hours.
ET-1 mediated dual transactivation of EGFR and
TGFR in BAECs
The question here is that whether there is evidence that the
transactivation signaling pathways induced by GPCR are
directly involved in phosphorylation of Smad2L? In order
to evaluate the role of ET-1 in TGFR transactivation, the
phosphorylation of Smad2C (Ser465/467) was investigated as
the instant downstream mediator of TGFR activation. BAECs
were treated with ET-1 (100 nM) in a period of 1-4 hours. ET-1
led to time-dependent increase in Smad2C phosphorylation at
hours two (P<0.05) and four (P<0.01, Fig .3A). These results
demonstrated that by induction of TGFR transactivation,
ET-1 can stimulate Smad2C phosphorylation in BAEC in
a time-dependent manner. Moreover, to examine the role
of ET-1 in EGFR transactivation, the phosphorylation of
ERK1/2 was investigated as the instant downstream mediator
of EGFR. BAECs were incubated with ET-1 (100 nM) in
certain intervals in a period from 5 minutes to 8 hours. ET-1
stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation in different points in
time between 5 minutes and 1 hours (P<0.01) and between
2 and 8 hours (P<0.05, Fig .3B). These results suggest that by
transactivation of EGFR, ET-1 can lead to phosphorylation of
ERK1/2 in BAEC.
Fig 3
ET-1 leads to phosphorylation of Smad2C and ERK1/2. BAECs were incubated with ET-1 (100 nM). ET-1; Endothelin-1, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01 vs.
untreated, min; Minutes, and h; Hours. Values are presented as mean ± SEM of three individual experiments.
ET-1 stimulates Smad2L phosphorylation through
dual transactivation of TGFR and EGFR, as well as
ROCK activity in BAECs
Subsequently, to explore the role of ET-1 induced
transactivation pathways in phosphorylation of Smad2L,
cells were evaluated in the presence of EGFR antagonist,
AG1478 (10 μM) and TGFR antagonist, SB431542 (10 μM) for 30 minutes prior to treatment with ET-1 (100 nM) for
4 hours. Phosphorylation of Smad2L (ser245/250/255)
was markedly alleviated in the presence of AG1478 and
SB431542 (P<0.05, Fig .4A). The results of this experiment
indicate that ET-1 can induce the phosphorylation of Smad2L
via transactivation of EGFR and TGFR. Furthermore, the
roles of ROCK and PLC were examined in ET-1-induced
phosphorylation of Smad2L (ser245/250/255). Neomycin
(100 μM), the specific inhibitor of PLCβ, was used as the
downstream mediator of Gαq for 1 hours prior to treatment
with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours, and Y27632 (10 μM), a
potent inhibitor of ROCK was used as the downstream
mediator of G12/13 for 30 minutes prior to treatment
with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours. The results of this work
showed that Y27632 can reduce Smad2L phosphorylation
(P<0.05), but neomycin cannot do the same (Fig .4B). This
shows that stimulation of Smad2L phosphorylation by
ET-1 is dependent on ROCK activity.
Fig 4
ET-1 leads to phosphorylation of Smad2L via both dual transactivation and the ROCK activity.
A. BAECs were preincubated with SB431542 (10 µM) for 30 minutes and
AG1478 (10 µM) for 5 minutes before stimulation with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours.
B. BAECs were preincubated with neomycin for 1 hours (100 μM) and with
Y27632 (10 µM) for 30 minutes before stimulation with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours. ET-1;
Endothelin-1, *; P<0.05 vs. untreated, #; P<0.05 vs. ET-1 treated.
Values are presented as mean ± SEM of three individual experiments.
ET-1 leads to phosphorylation of Smad2C and ERK1/2. BAECs were incubated with ET-1 (100 nM). ET-1; Endothelin-1, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01 vs.
untreated, min; Minutes, and h; Hours. Values are presented as mean ± SEM of three individual experiments.ET-1 leads to phosphorylation of Smad2L via both dual transactivation and the ROCK activity.
A. BAECs were preincubated with SB431542 (10 µM) for 30 minutes and
AG1478 (10 µM) for 5 minutes before stimulation with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours.
B. BAECs were preincubated with neomycin for 1 hours (100 μM) and with
Y27632 (10 µM) for 30 minutes before stimulation with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours. ET-1;
Endothelin-1, *; P<0.05 vs. untreated, #; P<0.05 vs. ET-1 treated.
Values are presented as mean ± SEM of three individual experiments.
ET-1 stimulated the protein expression of PAI-1 in
BAEC
The effects of ET-1 were examined on the protein
expression of PAI-1. BAECs were exposed to ET-1 (100
nM) at certain points in time from 30 minutes to 8 hours.
ET-1 induced the protein expression of PAI-1 at hours one
and two (P<0.05) and four (P<0.01, Fig .5). Overall, the
results showed that ET-1 increases the protein expression
of PAI-1 in BAEC. we chose four hours’ incubation time
with ET-1 for the next experiments.
Fig 5
ET-1 leads to an increase in the protein level of PAI-1. BAECs were incubated with ET-1 (100 nM) for 30 minutes to 8 hours. Values are presented as
mean ± SEM of three individual experiments. ET-1; Endothelin-1, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01 vs. untreated, min; Minutes, and h; Hours.
ET-1 stimulates the protein expression of PAI-1 in
BAECs through dual transactivation of TGFR and
EGFR, as well as the ROCK activity
To assess whether ET-1 leads to an increase in protein
expression of PAI-1 via its receptor with induction of
dual transactivation, AG1478 (10 μM) and SB431542
(10 μM) as EGFR and TGFR inhibitors, respectively,
and Bosentan (10 μM) as ET receptor inhibitor were
utilized for 30 minutes prior to treatment with ET-1(100
nM) for 4 hours. The results showed that ET-1-increased
protein expression of PAI-1 was reduced in the presence
of AG1478 (P<0.05), SB431542 (P<0.05), and Bosentan
(P<0.05, Fig .6A). The present work’s data showed
that via its receptor, ET-1 can transactivate EGFR and
TGFR in order to stimulate the protein expression of
PAI-1. Moreover, in order to study the roles of ROCK
and PLC as mediators of the transactivation pathway in
protein expression of PAI-1, neomycin (100 μM) for 1
hours and Y27632 (10 μM) for 30 minutes as inhibitors
of PLCβ and ROCK were used before being stimulated
with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours. The results showed the
significant reduction of the protein expression of PAI-1 in
the presence of Y27632 (P<0.05), while neomycin could
not inhibit the protein expression of PAI-1 (Fig .6B). From
this data, it was concluded that ET-1 increased the protein
expression of PAI-1, which was dependent on ROCK
activity.
Fig 6
ET-1 leads to an increase in the protein level of PAI-1 via induction of dual transactivation
pathways, as well as the ROCK activity. A. BAECs were preincubated with
SB431542 (10 µM), AG1478 (10 µM), and Bosentan (10 µM) 30 minutes before being
stimulated with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours. B. BAECs were preincubated
with neomycin (100 µM) for 1 hours and Y27632 (10 µM) for 30 minutes before
stimulation with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4hours. ET-1; Endothelin-1, *; P<0.05 vs.
untreated, #; P<0.05 vs. ET-1 treated. Values are presented as mean ± SEM of
three individual experiments.
ET-1 leads to an increase in the protein level of PAI-1. BAECs were incubated with ET-1 (100 nM) for 30 minutes to 8 hours. Values are presented as
mean ± SEM of three individual experiments. ET-1; Endothelin-1, *; P<0.05, **; P<0.01 vs. untreated, min; Minutes, and h; Hours.ET-1 leads to an increase in the protein level of PAI-1 via induction of dual transactivation
pathways, as well as the ROCK activity. A. BAECs were preincubated with
SB431542 (10 µM), AG1478 (10 µM), and Bosentan (10 µM) 30 minutes before being
stimulated with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4 hours. B. BAECs were preincubated
with neomycin (100 µM) for 1 hours and Y27632 (10 µM) for 30 minutes before
stimulation with ET-1 (100 nM) for 4hours. ET-1; Endothelin-1, *; P<0.05 vs.
untreated, #; P<0.05 vs. ET-1 treated. Values are presented as mean ± SEM of
three individual experiments.
Discussion
In this study, the role of ET-1-induced dual
transactivation pathways of EGFR and TGFR were
investigated in phosphorylation of Smad2L, as well as the
protein expression of PAI-1. Here, it was demonstrated that
ET-1 stimulates Smad2L phosphorylation and increases the
level of PAI-1 protein through transactivation of EGFR and
TGFR, and that ROCK has a central role in this pathway.
TGF-β1, alone and in combination with EGF, induced
the phosphorylation of Smad2L, which is consistent with
the data put out by Kamato et al. (10). Phosphorylation
of Smad2L was increased by EGF and TGF-β, indicating
the presence of the active pathways of these growth
factors in induction of Smad2L phosphorylation. Recent
studies have shown that in addition to EGF and TGF-β,
GPCR agonists result in activation of kinases such as
NOX, P38, and ERK through induction of TGFR and
EGFR transactivation (27). Our results showed that ET-1
increased the phosphorylation of Smad2L in BAECs.
Kamato et al. (10) presented the evidence that thrombin
leads to phosphorylation of Smad2L in VSMCs via
transactivation-dependent signaling pathways. In this
study, the focus was on the signaling pathways causing
the phosphorylation of Smad2L. It was demonstrated
that ET-1 stimulated the phosphorylation of Smad2C
via TGFR transactivation, as well as ERK1/2 via EGFR
transactivation, in BAEC. In a study recently published
by the authors, it has been shown that ET-1 stimulates the
phosphorylation of Smad2C via TGFR transactivation
in BAEC (13). Burch et al. (28) showed that via PAR-1,
thrombin can not only lead to EGFR transactivation, but
also TGFR transactivation in VSMCs.It was found that AG1478 (EGFR antagonist) and
SB431542 (TGFR antagonist) reduced the effect of
ET-1 on phosphorylation of Smad2L, suggesting that
ET-1 mediated the phosphorylation of Smad2L through
dual transactivation of EGFR and TGFR. Kamato et
al. (24) demonstrated that thrombin stimulated the
phosphorylation of Smad2L through transactivation of
both EGFR and TGFR in VSMC. GPCRs are the biggest
cell-surface receptors without any enzymatic activity.
These receptors associate with G proteins including Gα,
Gβ, and Gγ. Activated G proteins interact with diverse
mediators and can regulate signaling responses (8).
Signaling pathways that are activated by G proteins are
comprised of the following: phospholipase Cβ, adenylate
cyclase (AC), and cyclic adenosine monophosphate
(cAMP) pathways, as well as Rho kinase (ROCK) (29).There have been several studies on the roles of these mediators in transactivation
pathways. EGFR transactivation is stimulated by Ang II via increasing intracellular
Ca2+ and activation of PLC/IP3 pathway (30). On the other hand, another study
concluded that EGFR transactivation was induced by Ang II, independent of intracellular
calcium concentration and PLC/IP3 pathway (31). ROCK signaling leads to transactivation of
RSTK in the epithelial cells of mouse lung (32). Therefore, t in this study he roles of ROCK
and PLC were assessed in Smad2L phosphorylation. It was found that Y27632 (ROCK antagonist)
decreased the phosphorylation of Smad2L that was induced by ET-1, but neomycin (PLC
antagonist) had no effect on Smad2L phosphorylation. According to the previous studies, ROCK
leads to phosphorylation of Smad2C through TGFR transactivation (13, 28, 33). Therefore,
based on the results of this study, it is suggested that ROCK has an important role in ET-1
transactivation pathways and subsequently Smad2L phosphorylation. This result is consistent
with earlier studies, showing that thrombin stimulated the phosphorylation of Smad2L which
is dependent on MMP and ROCK activities in VSMCs (23). Wang et al. (34) showed that PAI-1 is
a remarkable prognosticator of cardiovascular disease -dependent death. PAI-1 is a
significant factor in the pathophysiology of vascular sclerosis. PAI-1 is mostly expressed
by endothelial cells as well as tissues with elevated TGF-β1 (35). Multiple studies have
confirmed that TGF-β1- induced PAI-1 expression occurs via stimulation of EGFR
transactivation in vascular, epithelial, and endothelial cells (35, 36). The current study
demonstrated that ET-1 increased the level of PAI-1 expression in BAECs in four hours after
treatment with ET-1; however, this response was decreased eight hours after the treatment.
Therefore, it is possible that deactivation of ET-1 occurred in eight hours. The same
pattern can be seen in Smad2L phosphorylation, thus verifying that these pathways are
related together. Cell lines alter in morphology, response to stimuli, growth rates, gene
and protein expression in different passage numbers (37). The changes observed in the
protein expression particularly in the control group in various experiments, may be
influenced by different passage numbers, which can be considered as a limitation of this
study. In addition, Cockell et al. (38) showed that thrombin induces antigen, natural
activity, and mRNA expression of PAI-1 in baboon aortic smooth muscle cells (BASMC). Kerins
et al. (39) indicated that Ang IV can stimulate the endothelial expression of PAI-1 via
induction of an endothelial receptor.The protein expression of PAI-1 that is stimulated
by ET-1 is decreased in the presence of SB431542 and
AG1478. It is suggested that induction of PAI-1 by ET-1
is intervened by transactivation of EGFR and TGFR.
Chaplin et al. (33) reported that thrombin transactivated
EGFR and TGFR, which can phosphorylate Smad2L
and ERK1/2, increase the gene expression of CHSY1
enzymes in VSMCs. The ET-1-stimulated protein
expression of PAI-1 was blocked in the presence of ET
receptor antagonist (bosentan), strongly suggesting that
this response is mediated via the ET-1 receptor. This study
has been the first attempt to scrutinize the significant role
of ROCK in protein expression of PAI-1 in BAECs. To
examine the importance of ROCK and PLC as mediators
of activated G proteins, the level of PAI-1 protein
was investigated in the presence of Y27632 (ROCK
antagonist) and neomycin (PLC antagonist). In a previous
study by the authors, it was shown that ET-1 receptor can
transactivate the TGFR and then phosphorylate Smad2C. It was demonstrated that Rho/ROCK kinase plays an
important role in mediating the transactivation of TGFR
and phosphorylation of Smad2C (Ser465/467) induced by
ET-1 (13). Moreover, in another study by the authors that
has not yet been published, the role of Rho/ROCK kinase is
investigated in ET-1-induced EGFR transactivation. In the
current study, a decrease in PAI-1 protein expression was
observed in the presence of Y27632 (ROCK antagonist)
that could inhibit Smad2L phosphorylation. Based on the
results obtained from this study, Rho/ROCK kinase (as
a mediator of the transactivation pathway) has a role in
Smad2L phosphorylation and PAI-1 protein expression.In this study, it was shown that ROCK is involved in
PAI-1 protein expression for the first time. Observations
of the current work strongly suggest that ROCK induced
Smad2L phosphorylation via transactivation and affected
the enhancement of PAI-1 protein expression. TGF-β1
increases the PAI-1 expression in aortic endothelial cells
via P38 and CDK activations, resulting in phosphorylation
of Smad2L (16). Similarly, Talati et al. (40) described that
thrombin induced the phosphorylation of the linker region
of Smad2 and the increase of the mRNA expression of
PAI-1 via transactivation of EGFR in keratinocytes. The
results showed that EGFR and TGFR transactivation
pathways that are induced by ET-1 are in fact independent
pathways. Whereas, Smad2L phosphorylation is the
common pathway between dual transactivation pathways.
Therefore, this study suggests that Smad2L can be
considered as a therapeutic target. However, further
studies are required in order to identify GPCRs signaling
more comprehensively.
Conclusion
The current study demonstrated that ET-1 stimulated
the phosphorylation of Smad2L, and this reaction was
blocked by AG1478 and SB431542, suggesting that
ET-1 leads to Smad2L phosphorylation via induction of
dual transactivation of EGFR and TGFR. According to
the results of previous studies, ROCK has a key role in
inducing transactivation pathways. Hence, induction of
Smad2L phosphorylation through dual transactivation
of EGFR and TGFR is dependent on ROCK signaling.
Furthermore, it was demonstrated that ET-1 increased
the level of PAI-1 protein via transactivation of EGFR
and TGFR, which is associated with promoting the
intravascular thrombosis and atherosclerosis. Moreover,
this cellular response is also dependent on ROCK
signaling. Therefore, it can be concluded that Smad2L
phosphorylation and promotion of PAI-1 protein’ level
may be related together. However, further studies are
needed to identity this signalling.
Authors: S Murasawa; Y Mori; Y Nozawa; N Gotoh; M Shibuya; H Masaki; K Maruyama; Y Tsutsumi; Y Moriguchi; Y Shibazaki; Y Tanaka; T Iwasaka; M Inada; H Matsubara Journal: Circ Res Date: 1998-06-29 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Danielle Kamato; Lyna Thach; Rebekah Bernard; Vincent Chan; Wenhua Zheng; Harveen Kaur; Margaret Brimble; Narin Osman; Peter J Little Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2015-03-24