| Literature DB >> 36093478 |
Shi Yan1, Yaodong Zhou1, Youlu Zhang1.
Abstract
Since the turn of the twenty-first century, the issue of aging has gained international attention. Both developed and developing nations are currently dealing with this issue. To ensure the sustained and healthy growth of the economy and society in the face of an aging society, it is especially important to establish a scientific old-age insurance system and a reasonable retirement system. We are all aware that the key indicators for the state to control the old-age insurance system in the old-age insurance system are the income and expenditure balance of the old-age insurance pooling account and the analysis of the ideal retirement age. In this paper, a better machine algorithm is used. By independently learning the rules present in a large amount of data and gaining new experience and knowledge, machine learning (ML) can increase computer intelligence and give computers decision-making abilities comparable to those of humans. In general, a machine learning algorithm uses the laws it derives from data to predict unknown data after automatically analysing the data. This study's findings suggest that the ideal retirement age and life expectancy are positively correlated, with the ideal retirement age's growth rate 12.57 percent higher than that of life expectancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36093478 PMCID: PMC9452002 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5870893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Classical neural network model.
Figure 2Architecture diagram of the endowment insurance system.
Figure 3Structure of the pension system.
Figure 4Trends of GDP growth rate and average wage growth rate.
Figure 5Salary scatter chart.
Figure 6Comparison of optimal retirement age.
Population growth rate under the two-child policy.
| 2010 | 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated growth rate | 0.69 | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.59 | 0.84 | 0.43 |
| Actual rate of growth | 0.11 | 0.69 | 0.54 | 0.05 | 0.78 | 0.57 |
GDP ratio comparison.
| 2010 | 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimated GDP | 0.91 | 0.06 | 0.94 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 0.54 |
| Real GDP | 0.3 | 0.11 | 0.7 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
Simulation of optimal retirement age.
| 2010 | 2012 | 2014 | 2016 | 2018 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimal retirement age 1 | 63.46 | 63.96 | 64.5 | 61.27 | 60.67 | 63.21 |
| Optimal retirement age 2 | 62.76 | 64.89 | 60.28 | 61.65 | 63.01 | 62.17 |
Figure 7Population growth rate under the two-child policy.
Figure 8GDP ratio comparison.
Figure 9Simulation of optimal retirement age.