| Literature DB >> 36093408 |
Chunyan Ren1, Zhanguo Su2, Yiping Su3, Lu Wang2.
Abstract
Polyurethane, as a rubber material, can relieve the load on the ground and provide seismic design for the venue, which is of great significance for sports venues. In order to improve the seismic resistance and abrasion resistance of materials for sports fields and reduce accidents in sports, this article has carried out research on the polyurethane elastomer layered nanocomposites for sports fields and their preparation. Today's world is a challenging era of science and technology. The fields of biotechnology, information, medicine, energy, environment, and national defense and security are closely related to the development of high tech, and the requirements for materials are becoming increasingly diversified. Polymer nanocomposite coating has the dual characteristics of organic and inorganic components. It not only retains the advantages of a polymer but also endows it with versatility. It meets the current application needs. It is a hot spot in today's research. Among them, there are two major problems in the composite process of nanomaterials and polymers: dispersion and compatibility. How to improve the dispersion of nanoparticles and enhance the compatibility between nanoparticles and polymers is an urgent problem to be solved. In the method part, this article introduces a small amount of polyurethane and polyurethane elastomers formed after polyurethane modification and introduces layered compounds and nanocomposites and introduces several models involved in nanomaterials in terms of algorithms. In the analysis part, this paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of the hard segment mass fraction, mechanical properties, thermal decomposition behavior, degradation mechanism, and dynamic mechanical properties. With the increase of GO content, the tensile strength increases significantly and the elongation at break becomes smaller and smaller. When the GO content increases from 0% to 2%, the tensile properties of the WPU film increase from 2.6 MPa to 7.9 MPa and the fracture of the elongation decreased from 201.7% to 62.8%. This shows that the increase in GO content will make the composite material harder and brittle. It can be seen from the experimental results that the preparation of the polyurethane elastomer layered nanocomposite material designed in this paper has a good application effect on sports venues.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36093408 PMCID: PMC9462988 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5152911
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.246
Figure 1Schematic diagram of polyurethane.
Comparison of hardness and tear strength between polyurethane elastomer and rubber.
| Performance | Polyurethane elastomer | Natural rubber | Styrene butadiene rubber |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hardness (shore A) | 75–85 | 70–75 | 60–65 |
| Tear strength | 35–55 | 15–20 | 9––10 |
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the layered compound structure.
Main experimental equipment used in the experiment.
| Equipment name | Instrument model |
|---|---|
| Temperature programmed muffle furnace | SX2-4-10 |
| Vacuum-drying oven | DZF-6030 |
| Electronic balance | JA 2010 |
| Magnetic stirrer | JA-4 |
| Circulating water-type multipurpose vacuum pump | SHT-12C |
| High-speed desktop centrifuge | TGL-18D |
| Ultrasonic cleaner | JB-225B |
Part of the raw material name.
| Name | Chemical formula | Specification |
|---|---|---|
| Triethylamine | TEA | AR |
| Acetone | C3H6O | AR |
| Polycarbonate diol | L5651-2000 | Industrial products |
| Polyether glycol | TDIOL-1000 | Industrial products |
| Dimethylol propionic acid | DMPA | 98% |
| Dibutyltin dilaurate | C32H64O4Sn | AR |
The stress and strain of WPU and WPU/Ag-HNT nanocomposites.
| Sample | Young's modulus (MPa) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Elongation at break (%) | Antibacterial properties (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WPU/Ag-HNT-0 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 2.13 ± 0.1 | 4.59 ± 7.2 | 81.2 ± 3.7 |
| WPU/Ag-HNT-1 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 3.53 ± 0.1 | 3.56 ± 6.3 | 84.6 ± 3.2 |
| WPU/Ag-HNT-2 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 5.65 ± 0.3 | 2.87 ± 4.1 | 86.7 ± 4.7 |
| WPU/Ag-HNT-3 | 12.7 ± 0.5 | 8.41 ± 0.3 | 1.82 ± 3 | 89.1 ± 4.1 |
Hard segment quality score test results.
| Sample serial number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hard segment (wt%) | 20.34 | 21.98 | 23.45 | 25.34 | 27.43 | 28.74 | 29.88 | 30.02 | 30.94 | 32.18 |
Figure 3Tensile stress-strain curves of WPU and GO/WPU composites.
Figure 4Heat release rate curves of WPU and GO/WPU nanocomposites.
Figure 5Response time analysis.
Figure 6Loss factor curve of WPU and WPU composite materials.
Thermal performance and dynamic mechanical performance analysis data of WPU and WPU composite materials.
| Samples | Temperature | DMA data | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| TgS | Tgh | △Tg | |
| WPU | 211 | 357 | 389 | -34.5 | 41.4 | 75.9 |
| WPU/SMT | 248 | 379 | 401 | -23.5 | 59.5 | 83.0 |
| WPU/SAT | 229 | 371 | 399 | -31.9 | 53.5 | 85.4 |
| WPU/SHT | 218 | 361 | 391 | -41.8 | 50.6 | 92.4 |
Figure 7DSC curve of modified H-PU with different S-HBP contents.
The main element content WDXRF in HNTs and Ag-HNT.
| Element | Sample | |
|---|---|---|
| Si | Ag-HNT | HNTs |
| Al | 29. 22 | 39.33 |
| O | 14.54 | 13.53 |
| Fe | 49.08 | 39.18 |
| Ti | 3.93 | 3.93 |
| Ca | 0.79 | 1.79 |
| Mg | 0.44 | 1.33 |
| Ag | 0.14 | 1.13 |
| Others | 0.105 | 1.115 |
Figure 8Comparison between WPU and WPU/Ag-HNT.
Figure 9The comparison of energy storage effects.