| Literature DB >> 36093037 |
Tamil Moli Loganathan1, Mohamed Thariq Hameed Sultan1,2,3, Qumrul Ahsan4, Mohammad Jawaid2, Jesuarockiam Naveen5, Ain Umaira Md Shah1, Abd Rahim Abu Talib1, Adi Azriff Basri1.
Abstract
Natural fibers have emerged as a potential alternate to synthetic fibers, because of their excellent performance, biodegradability, renewability and sustainability. This research has focused on investigating the thermal, visco-elastic and fire-retardant properties of different hybrid Cytostachys Renda (CR)/kenaf fiber (K) (50/0; 35/ 15, 25/25, 15/ 35, 0/50)-reinforced MWCNT (multi-walled carbon nanotubes)-modified phenolic composites. The mass% of MWCNT-modified phenolic resin was maintained 50 mass% including 0.5 mass% of MWCNT. In order to achieve homogeneous dispersion ball milling process was employed to incorporate the MWCNT into phenolic resin (powder). Thermal results from thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetric analysis revealed that the hybrid composites (35/15; 35 mass% CR and 15 mass% K) showed higher thermal stability among the composite samples. Visco-elastic results revealed that kenaf fiber-based MWCNT-modified composites (0/50; 0 mass% CR and 50 mass% K) exhibited higher storage and loss modulus due to high modulus kenaf fiber. Fire-retardant analysis (UL-94) showed that all the composite samples met H-B self-extinguishing rating and exhibited slow burning rate according to limiting oxygen index (LOI) test. However, (15/35; 15 mass% CR and 35 mass% K) hybrid composites showed the highest time to ignition, highest fire performance index, lowest total heat release rate, average mass loss rate, average fire growth rate index and maximum average rate of heat emission. Moreover, the smoke density of all hybrid composites was found to be less than 200 which meets the federal aviation regulations (FAR) 25.853d standard. Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) was carried out to select an optimal composite sample considering the thermal, visco-elastic and fire-retardant behaviors. Through TOPSIS analysis, the hybrid (15/35; 15 mass% CR and 35 mass% K) composite sample has been selected as an optimal composite which can be used for high-temperature aircraft and automotive applications. © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.Entities:
Keywords: Cytostachys Renda; Kenaf fiber; Modified phenolic; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; TOPSIS; Thermal properties
Year: 2022 PMID: 36093037 PMCID: PMC9447359 DOI: 10.1007/s10973-022-11557-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Therm Anal Calorim ISSN: 0368-4466 Impact factor: 4.755
Formulation of hybrid composites
| Designation ratio of hybrid composites | 0.5 mass% MWCNT + Phenolic resin / mass% | CR / mass% | K / mass% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| 7C:3 K | 50 | 35 | 15 |
| 5C:5 K | 50 | 25 | 25 |
| 3C:7 K | 50 | 15 | 35 |
| 0C:10 K | 50 | 0 | 50 |
C Cyrtostachys renda, K Kenaf
Characteristics of Criteria
| Alternative | Criteria | Type | Mass |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | TGA | + | 0.2 |
| 7C:3 K | Storage Modulus | + | 0.2 |
| 5C:5 K | LOI | + | 0.2 |
| 3C:7 K | FPI | + | 0.2 |
| 0C:10 K | VOF | − | 0.2 |
Fig. 1TGA and DTG curve of hybrid CR and Kenaf reinforced phenolic composites
Profiles of decomposition of hybrid composites in nitrogen environment
| Composites | Temperature range / °C | Peak Temperature / °C | Mass loss / % | Residue / % | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | 25–160 | 68 | 5.80 | 32.07 | Present study |
| 160–373 | 331 | 31.98 | |||
| 373–763 | 434 | 21.31 | |||
| 7C:3 K | 25–147 | 71 | 5.30 | 32.46 | |
| 147–377 | 333 | 33.33 | |||
| 377–822 | 436 | 23.26 | |||
| 5C:5 K | 25–148 | 70 | 6.15 | 22.80 | |
| 147–374 | 335 | 37.45 | |||
| 374–833 | 434 | 32.38 | |||
| 3C:7 K | 25–151 | 69 | 6.15 | 31.59 | |
| 151–377 | 335 | 37.45 | |||
| 377–803 | 436 | 32.38 | |||
| 0C:10 K | 25–150 | 63 | 5.71 | 30.09 | |
| 150–377 | 339 | 37.45 | |||
| 377–717 | 434 | 32.38 | |||
| Pristine phenolic | 420–600 | 510 | 32.16 | 55.97 | [ |
Fig. 2Graphical represents of the thermal degradation pathway of CR/Kenaf reinforced MWCNT-phenolic hybrid composites
Fig. 3DSC graph of hybrid composites
Result obained from DSC graph
| Onset temp | Peak temp | Offset Temp | Latent heat/ J g-1 | Residue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | 325 | 341 | 357 | 40.19 | 32.07 |
| 7C:3 K | 323 | 343 | 363 | 88.83 | 32.46 |
| 5C:5 K | 358 | 365 | 372 | 7.84 | 22.80 |
| 3C:7 K | 348 | 359 | 378 | 11.91 | 31.59 |
| 0C:10 K | 347 | 356 | 362 | 10.78 | 30.09 |
Fig. 4Results of DMA a) Storage Modulus, b) Loss Modulus, c) Tan δ
Fig. 5Chemical bonding of natural fiber with phenolic resin adapted from [35]
Results of DMA analysis on CR, K, and hybrid composites
| Specimens | Storage Modulus, E′ at 30 °C/MPa | Storage Modulus, E′ at 120 °C/MPa | Storage modulus Tg value/°C | Loss modulus Tg value/°C | Tan δ Tg value/°C | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | 3470 | 2060 | 46.5 | 96.2 | 110 | Present study |
| 7C:3 K | 4180 | 2460 | 56.9 | 109.0 | 116 | Present study |
| 5C:5 K | 2470 | 2070 | 40.9 | 86.3 | 85 | Present study |
| 3C:7 K | 3370 | 3070 | 48.7 | 107 | 103 | Present study |
| 0C:10 K | 5740 | 3120 | 51.1 | 101 | 115 | Present study |
| Pristine phenolic | 2400 | 1250 | 68.89 | 93.01 | 80 | [ |
Fig. 6Cole–Cole plots of the C, K and hybrid composites
Data obtained for UL-94 Horizontal and LOI testing for hybrid (C and K) fiber reinforced MWCNT-phenolic composites
| Composites | UL-94 Horizonta/mm min-1 | LOI/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dripping | Linear burning rate, V/mm min-1 | Rating | k | LOI (vol. %) | Standard deviation | |||
| 10C:0 K | No | 0 | H-B | 25.7 | −0.94 | 0.2 | 26.31 | 0.18 |
| 7C:3 K | No | 0 | H-B | 27.2 | −1.60 | 0.2 | 26.88 | 0.19 |
| 5C:5 K | No | 0 | H-B | 27.0 | −0.83 | 0.2 | 26.90 | 0.13 |
| 3C:7 K | No | 0 | H-B | 26.8 | −0.83 | 0.2 | 26.97 | 0.11 |
| 0C:10 K | No | 0 | H-B | 27.9 | −0.50 | 0.2 | 27.80 | 0.37 |
Flame is extinguished before the first mark (UL-94 Horizontal)
Fig. 7The char formation during the pyrolysis process of the composite
Cone calorimetry data for CR/kenaf reinforced phenolic composites
| Composites | TTI/s | HRR/kW m-2 | pHRR/kW m-2 | At time/s | THR/MJ ms | FPI = TTI/PHRR | MLRAVG g/m2s | FIGRA/W m-2 s-1 | MARHE/kW m-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | 61 (2) | 61 (3) | 187 (11) | 176 (2) | 75 (1) | 0.33 | 3.74 (1.2) | 1335 (127) | 111 (4) |
| 7C:3 K | 100 (3) | 40 (2) | 209 (8) | 231 (4) | 74 (2) | 0.51 | 2.21 (1.8) | 1353 (113) | 104 (8) |
| 5C:5 K | 102 (2) | 37 (3) | 215 (8) | 231 (5) | 68 (1) | 0.46 | 2.23 (1.4) | 1219 (142) | 111 (5) |
| 3C:7 K | 162 (4) | 36 (4) | 205 (9) | 222 (3) | 65 (3) | 0.71 | 2.09 (1.2) | 1039 (122) | 83 (4) |
| 0C:10 K | 65 (3) | 59 (3) | 219 (10) | 207 (2) | 76 (2) | 0.30 | 3.55 (1.3) | 1208 (132) | 104 (5) |
The values in parentheses are the standard deviations
TTI = Time to ignition (s), HRR = heat release rate, pHRR = peak heat release rate, at time = Time at peak heat release rate, THR = Total heat release, FPI = fire performance index (ratio of time to ignition (TTI) to PHRR), MLRAVG = average mass loss rate, FIGRA = fire growth rate index, MARHE = maximum average rate of heat emission
Fig. 8Heat release rate curves as function of time for C/K reinforced MWCNT modified phenolic composites
Smoke emission properties of CR/ kenaf reinforced phenolic hybrid composites
| Composites | Dynamic method | Static method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cone calorimeter | Smoke density | ||||
| TSP/m2 | SMOGRA /m2 s-2 | SEA/AVG m2 kg-1 | Ds,max | VOF4 | |
| 10C:0K | 3.6 (0.6) | 1.39 (0.7) | 38.09 (3.8) | 284.24 (22.1) | 48.15 (9.6) |
| 7C:3K | 3.7 (0.6) | 1.44 (0.8) | 30.73 (4.1) | 348.03 (40.4) | 35.59 (5.2) |
| 5C:5K | 3.9 (0.4) | 1.57 (0.6) | 32.79 (2.8) | 270.90 (32.9) | 28.26 (7.5) |
| 3C:7K | 4.5 (0.8) | 1.58 (0.9) | 33.92 (3.5) | 315.05 (28.7) | 18.76 (4.2) |
| 0C:10K | 3.1 (0.3) | 1.52 (0.9) | 24.66 (3.6) | 250. 20 (34.8) | 12.34 (3.9) |
aThe values in parentheses are the standard deviations
Decision matrix
| TGA | Storage Modulus | LOI | FPI | VOF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | 32.07 | 3470 | 26.31 | 0.33 | 48.15 |
| 7C:3 K | 32.46 | 4180 | 26.88 | 0.51 | 35.59 |
| 5C:5 K | 22.8 | 2470 | 26.9 | 0.46 | 28.26 |
| 3C:7 K | 31.59 | 3370 | 26.97 | 0.71 | 18.76 |
| 0C:10 K | 30.09 | 5740 | 27.8 | 0.3 | 12.34 |
The normalized matrix
| TGA | Storage Modulus | LOI | FPI | VOF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | 0.478 | 0.388 | 0.425 | 0.304 | 0.689 |
| 7C:3 K | 0.484 | 0.468 | 0.448 | 0.471 | 0.509 |
| 5C:5 K | 0.34 | 0.276 | 0.449 | 0.424 | 0.404 |
| 3C:7 K | 0.471 | 0.377 | 0.45 | 0.655 | 0.268 |
| 0C:10 K | 0.448 | 0.642 | 0.464 | 0.277 | 0.177 |
Distance to positive, negative ideal points and the relative closeness value and ranking
| Composites | Distance to positive and negative ideal points | The relative closeness value and ranking | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distance to positive ideal | Distance to negative ideal | Relative closeness, Ci | Rank | |
| 10C:0 K | 0.134 | 0.036 | 0.211 | 5 |
| 7C:3 K | 0.084 | 0.071 | 0.46 | 3 |
| 5C:5 K | 0.102 | 0.064 | 0.387 | 4 |
| 3C:7 K | 0.056 | 0.118 | 0.677 | 1 |
| 0C:10 K | 0.076 | 0.128 | 0.627 | 2 |
The weighted normalized matrix
| TGA | Storage Modulus | LOI | FPI | VOF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10C:0 K | 0.096 | 0.078 | 0.085 | 0.061 | 0.138 |
| 7C:3 K | 0.097 | 0.094 | 0.09 | 0.094 | 0.102 |
| 5C:5 K | 0.068 | 0.055 | 0.09 | 0.085 | 0.081 |
| 3C:7 K | 0.094 | 0.075 | 0.09 | 0.131 | 0.054 |
| 0C:10 K | 0.09 | 0.128 | 0.093 | 0.055 | 0.035 |
The positive and negative ideal values
| Positive ideal | Negative ideal | |
|---|---|---|
| TGA | 0.097 | 0.068 |
| Storage Modulus | 0.128 | 0.055 |
| LOI | 0.093 | 0.085 |
| FPI | 0.131 | 0.055 |
| VOF | 0.035 | 0.138 |
Fig. 9Relative closeness factor of C and/ or K hybrid modified phenolic composite