| Literature DB >> 36092892 |
Sheetal Mehla1, Upendra Kumar1, Prexha Kapoor1, Yogita Singh1, Pooja Sihag1, Vijeta Sagwal1, Priyanka Balyan2, Anuj Kumar3,4, Navjeet Ahalawat1, Nita Lakra1, Krishna Pal Singh5,6, Vladan Pesic7, Ivica Djalovic8, Reyazul Rouf Mir9, Om Parkash Dhankher10.
Abstract
Grain yield is one of the most important aims for combating the needs of the growing world population. The role of development and nutrient transfer in flag leaf for higher yields at the grain level is well known. It is a great challenge to properly exploit this knowledge because all the processes, starting from the emergence of the flag leaf to the grain filling stages of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), are very complex biochemical and physiological processes to address. This study was conducted with the primary goal of functionally and structurally annotating the candidate genes associated with different developmental stages of flag leaf in a comprehensive manner using a plethora of in silico tools. Flag leaf-associated genes were analyzed for their structural and functional impacts using a set of bioinformatics tools and algorithms. The results revealed the association of 17 candidate genes with different stages of flag leaf development in wheat crop. Of these 17 candidate genes, the expression analysis results revealed the upregulation of genes such as TaSRT1-5D, TaPNH1-7B, and TaNfl1-2B and the downregulation of genes such as TaNAP1-7B, TaNOL-4D, and TaOsl2-2B can be utilized for the generation of high-yielding wheat varieties. Through MD simulation and other in silico analyses, all these proteins were found to be stable. Based on the outcome of bioinformatics and molecular analysis, the identified candidate genes were found to play principal roles in the flag leaf development process and can be utilized for higher-yield wheat production.Entities:
Keywords: MD simulation; flag leaf development; gene expression analysis; homology modeling; qRT-PCR (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction)
Year: 2022 PMID: 36092892 PMCID: PMC9449350 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.933560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1Morphology of the flag leaf of DBW303 and WH147 at different stages of sample collection.
List of identified flag leaf development–associated genes along with their basic characteristics elucidated with the help of the Ensembl Plants database.
| S No. | Gene | Ensembl ID | Location | Cellular location | CDS | AA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| TraesCS4B02G050600 | 4B | Cytoskeleton | 1982 | 385 |
| 2 |
| TraesCS3D02G246500 | 3D | Endosome, membrane | 4,445 | 1,124 |
| 3 |
| TraesCS3D02G274600 | 3D | Nucleus | 1747 | 386 |
| 4 |
| TraesCS7B02G167200 | 7B | Cytoplasm | 4,074 | 1,357 |
| 5 |
| TraesCS2B02G464200 | 2B | Nucleus | 1,428 | 392 |
| 6 |
| TraesCS4D02G012100 | 4D | Chloroplast thylakoid | 1,432 | 345 |
| 7 |
| TraesCS3D02G159800 | 3D | Plastid, integral part of membrane | 2,121 | 499 |
| 8 |
| TraesCS7A02G338900 | 7A | Chloroplast | 2,258 | 547 |
| 9 |
| TraesCS4A02G256700 | 4A | Nucleus | 1,616 | 362 |
| 10 |
| TraesCS2B02G440400 | 2B | Mitochondria | 1,536 | 511 |
| 11 |
| TraesCS1B02G274500 | 1B | Cytoplasm | 1981 | 555 |
| 12 |
| TraesCS7B02G256500 | 7B | Cytoplasm | 3,410 | 956 |
| 13 |
| TraesCS7D02G492300 | 7D | Chloroplast | 1,565 | 455 |
| 14 |
| TraesCS5B02G143100 | 5B | Nucleus | 2,339 | 638 |
| 15 |
| TraesCS5D02G325900 | 5D | Chloroplast mitochondria | 1798 | 280 |
| 16 |
| TraesCS5D02G066000 | 5D | Nucleus | 2,870 | 755 |
| 17 |
| TraesCS6B02G348700 | 6B | Golgi apparatus | 2,961 | 660 |
FIGURE 2Distribution of 17 candidate genes associated with the development of the flag leaf on different chromosomes of wheat.
FIGURE 3Distribution of exons and introns along with upstream and downstream regions in wheat candidate genes associated with flag leaf development (predicted by the GSDV v2.0 server).
Physiochemical properties of candidate proteins associated with the development of flag leaf through the ProtParam server.
| S No. | Protein | Molecular weight | Theoretical isoelectric point | Instability index | Aliphatic index | GRAVY | Stability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TaAct1-4B | 42,740.95 | 5.37 | 35.52 | 85.87 | −0.151 | Stable |
| 2 | TaBri1-3D | 120,078.06 | 5.8 | 33.29 | 97.54 | −0.014 | Stable |
| 3 | TaGATA12-3D | 40,961.89 | 5.96 | 67.28 | 67.1 | −0.445 | Unstable |
| 4 | TaNAP1-7B | 151,621.01 | 6.35 | 48.48 | 94.48 | −0.147 | Unstable |
| 5 | TaNfl1-2B | 43,014.87 | 8.96 | 49.08 | 71.17 | −0.493 | Unstable |
| 6 | TaNOL-4D | 37,714.23 | 9.6 | 42.73 | 80.09 | −0.26 | Unstable |
| 7 | TaNyc1-3D | 41,890.06 | 8.12 | 37.96 | 89.87 | 0.005 | Stable |
| 8 | TaNyc3-7A | 42,721.67 | 6.02 | 54.32 | 82.27 | −0.212 | Unstable |
| 9 | TaOsh1-4A | 40,079.08 | 6.28 | 55.69 | 74.75 | −0.579 | Unstable |
| 10 | TaOsl2-2B | 48,653.93 | 6.81 | 42.22 | 86.15 | −0.066 | Unstable |
| 11 | TaPME1-1B | 58,739.1 | 7.53 | 34.11 | 79.17 | 0.009 | Stable |
| 12 | TaPNH1-7B | 107,038.12 | 9.32 | 47.07 | 81.5 | −0.387 | Unstable |
| 13 | TaRCCR1-7D | 35,590.81 | 6.41 | 46.7 | 94.68 | 0 | Unstable |
| 14 | TaSCR-5B | 44,271.15 | 7.82 | 67.91 | 82.17 | −0.32 | Unstable |
| 15 | TaSGR-5D | 31,188.61 | 8.69 | 52.31 | 81.61 | −0.296 | Unstable |
| 16 | TaSRT1-5D | 82,979.01 | 5.62 | 39.97 | 84.82 | −0.131 | Stable |
| 17 | TaTSD2-6B | 71,552.22 | 6.61 | 40.68 | 75.09 | −0.372 | Unstable |
Enumeration of dihedral properties of proteins after dihedral analysis through SWISS-MODEL server.
| S No. | Protein | MolProbity score | QMEAN | Stability | Solvation | Torsion | R favor (%) | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TaAct1-4B | 0.77 | −0.48 | Stable | 0.01 | −0.41 | 97.88 | Monomer |
| 2 | TaBri1-3D | 1.41 | −1.97 | Stable | −2.25 | −1.35 | 92.05 | Monomer |
| 3 | TaGATA12-3D | 1.74 | −2.20 | Stable | 0.03 | −2.82 | 86.11 | Monomer |
| 4 | TaNfl1-2B | 0.87 | −1.00 | Stable | 0.60 | −1.21 | 97.52 | Monomer |
| 5 | TaNOL-4D | 2.66 | −4.10 | Unstable | −0.74 | −3.31 | 89.24 | Homotetramer |
| 6 | TaNyc1-3D | 1.53 | −3.14 | Stable | −0.84 | −2.61 | 91.88 | Homotetramer |
| 7 | TaNyc3-7A | 2.14 | −5.24 | Unstable | −0.41 | −4.84 | 89.47 | Monomer |
| 8 | TaPME1-1B | 1.43 | −2.88 | Stable | −1.32 | −2.10 | 93.71 | Monomer |
| 9 | TaPNH1-7B | 1.69 | −2.02 | Stable | 0.08 | −1.67 | 92.64 | Monomer |
| 10 | TaSRT1-5D | 1.79 | −4.55 | Unstable | −0.17 | −4.11 | 89.71 | Monomer |
| 11 | TaOsh1-4A | 1.28 | −0.90 | Stable | 0.61 | −1.29 | 96.67 | Monomer |
| 12 | TaOsl2-2B | 1.76 | −1.80 | Stable | 0.71 | −1.87 | 93.79 | Homodimer |
| 13 | TaNAP1-7B | 1.67 | −4.43 | Unstable | 0.26 | −3.98 | 91.18 | Monomer |
| 14 | TaRCCR1-7D | 1.91 | −0.28 | Stable | 0.68 | −0.29 | 94.88 | Homodimer |
| 15 | TaSCR-5B | 1.05 | −0.48 | Stable | 0.64 | −0.87 | 98.04 | Monomer |
| 16 | TaSGR-5D | 1.45 | −3.01 | Stable | −3.47 | −1.74 | 89.74 | Monomer |
| 17 | TaTSD2-6B | 2.41 | −3.28 | Stable | −2.04 | −2.30 | 94.7 | Monomer |
FIGURE 4Homology-based models (molecular graphical images) produced using UCSF Chimera.
FIGURE 5Localization of ligands interacting with the modeled protein structure through ChimeraX.
Catalog of dihedral properties of candidate proteins elucidated through Ramachandran plot analysis.
| S No. | Protein | Most favored region | Generously allowed region | Additionally allowed region | Disallowed region | G score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TaAct1-4B | 94.2 | 0.0 | 5.80 | 0.0 | −0.07 |
| 2 | TaBri1-3D | 77.2 | 0.7 | 22.1 | 0.0 | −0.22 |
| 3 | TaGATA12-3D | 75.0 | 3.6 | 21.4 | 0.0 | −0.10 |
| 4 | TaNAP1-7B | 89.1 | 1.1 | 9.10 | 0.7 | −0.15 |
| 5 | TaNfl1-2B | 95.2 | 1.4 | 3.40 | 0.0 | 0.07 |
| 6 | TaNOL-4D | 89.2 | 1.6 | 9.00 | 0.6 | −0.20 |
| 7 | TaNyc1-3D | 88.1 | 0.7 | 10.6 | 0.6 | −0.13 |
| 8 | TaNyc3-7A | 86.1 | 0.5 | 12.5 | 1.0 | −0.32 |
| 9 | TaOsh1-4A | 96.3 | 0.0 | 3.70 | 0.0 | −0.07 |
| 10 | TaOsl2-2B | 87.8 | 0.8 | 10.8 | 0.6 | −0.12 |
| 11 | TaPME1-1B | 87.1 | 0.4 | 12.5 | 0.0 | −0.16 |
| 12 | TaPNH1-7B | 88.9 | 1.4 | 9.40 | 0.3 | −0.09 |
| 13 | TaRCCR1-7D | 90.2 | 0.0 | 9.60 | 0.2 | −0.14 |
| 14 | TaSCR-5B | 95.6 | 0.0 | 4.40 | 0.0 | 0.02 |
| 15 | TaSGR-5D | 82.4 | 0.0 | 14.7 | 2.9 | −0.15 |
| 16 | TaSRT1-5D | 86.5 | 1.9 | 11.0 | 0.6 | −0.23 |
| 17 | TaTSD2-6B | 88.8 | 1.7 | 8.60 | 0.9 | −0.28 |
FIGURE 6Hierarchical clustering of wheat genes based on their expression in 44 different tissues.
FIGURE 7Hierarchical clustering of wheat genes based on their expression in ten different development stages.
FIGURE 8Hierarchical clustering of wheat genes based on their expression under the emergence stage in flag leaf.
FIGURE 9Hierarchical clustering of wheat genes based on their expression under senescence perturbations.
FIGURE 10Developmental stages of flag leaf in wheat.
FIGURE 11Graphical representation of relative expression levels of nine candidate genes in two wheat varieties namely DBW303 and WH147 at three different developmental stages namely flag leaf emergence (DBW303A, WH147A); fully developed flag leaf (DBW303B, WH147B) and flag leaf at the time of senescence (DBW303C, WH147C).
FIGURE 12Graphical representation of relative expression levels of 8 candidate genes in two wheat varieties namely DBW303 and WH147 at three different developmental stages namely flag leaf emergence (DBW303A, WH147A); fully developed flag leaf (DBW303B, WH147B) and flag leaf at the time of senescence (DBW303C, WH147C) in the manuscript.
FIGURE 13MD simulations of genes associated with flag leaf development.
FIGURE 14Phylogenetic tree of proteins associated with the development of flag leaf constructed through MegaX software.