| Literature DB >> 36092858 |
Abdullah AlGhobaishi1, Haifa Alzabin1, Asma Alhazmi1, Ahmed Hafez Mousa1,2,3, Hatem AlThagafi1, Mohammed Alghamdi4, Adeeb Khawaji1, Eyad Albenayan5, Roaa Zailaie6, Rana Hassan Almaghrabi7, Mohammed A Garout8,9.
Abstract
Introduction: The hand hygiene practice (HHP) is the most effective and simplest preventive measure to reduce the risk of infection. HHP is more relevant among pediatric physicians in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic since, children are more vulnerable to infection. Therefore, assessment of the COVID-19 impact on HHP could be useful in minimizing lethal virus transmission from pediatric physicians to patients and vice versa. Method: The present cross-sectional, electronically self-administered supplement based survey study was conducted among different professional levels of pediatric physicians involving consultants, specialists, and residents. The supplement includes information related to demography, knowledge, awareness, preventive measures, demonstration and practice of HHP. The information was collected and summarized on a Microsoft excel sheet before being imported to SPSS for statistical analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Adherence; Awareness; COVID-19; Hand hygiene practice; Knowledge; Pediatrician
Year: 2022 PMID: 36092858 PMCID: PMC9444314 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801
Showed demographical characteristics, knowledge, awareness, demonstration and practice of HHP practice among pediatricians.
| Demographic characteristics | Number (N = 404) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 229 | 56.68 |
| Female | 175 | 43.32 |
| 25–35 | 174 | 43.06 |
| 35–45 | 122 | 30.20 |
| 45–55 | 89 | 22.02 |
| >60 | 19 | 4.70 |
| South of Saudi Arabia | 34 | 8.41 |
| Central Saudi Arabia | 98 | 24.25 |
| East of Saudi Arabia | 35 | 8.66 |
| West of Saudi Arabia | 230 | 56.93 |
| North of Saudi Arabia | 07 | 1.73 |
| Consultant | 171 | 42.32 |
| Residents | 127 | 31.44 |
| Specialist | 106 | 26.24 |
| General pediatrics | 166 | 41.08 |
| Critical department | 150 | 37.13 |
| Pediatric subspecialty | 88 | 21.78 |
| Yes | 396 | 98.01 |
| No | 08 | 1.99 |
| Yes | 401 | 99.26 |
| No | 03 | 0.74 |
| Yes | 292 | 72.28 |
| No | 112 | 27.72 |
| Yes | 396 | 98.01 |
| No | 08 | 1.99 |
| Yes | 302 | 74.75 |
| No | 102 | 25.25 |
| Yes | 384 | 95.04 |
| No | 20 | 4.95 |
| Yes | 397 | 98.27 |
| No | 07 | 1.73 |
| Yes | 273 | 67.57 |
| No | 131 | 32.43 |
| Yes | 392 | 97.02 |
| No | 12 | 2.98 |
| I. Close contact with other health care workers | 32 | 7.92 |
| II. Germs already present on or within the patient | 35 | 8.66 |
| III. The hospital environment | 157 | 38.86 |
| IV. The hospital's water system | 06 | 1.49 |
| V. The hospital air | 07 | 1.73 |
| I + II | 07 | 1.73 |
| II + III | 32 | 7.92 |
| I + II|+III | 36 | 8.91 |
| V + I + II | 25 | 6.18 |
| III + II + I | 28 | 6.93 |
| III + II + I + IV + V | 39 | 9.65 |
| 100% | 187 | 46.28 |
| 75% | 102 | 25.24 |
| 50% | 64 | 15.85 |
| 25% | 51 | 12.63 |
| Rubbing | 300 | 74.25 |
| Washing | 101 | 25 |
| None | 03 | 0.74 |
| Rubbing | 229 | 56.68 |
| Washing | 171 | 42.33 |
| None | 04 | 0.90 |
| Rubbing | 250 | 61.88 |
| Washing | 144 | 35.64 |
| None | 10 | 2.47 |
| Rubbing | 115 | 28.47 |
| Washing | 274 | 67.82 |
| None | 15 | 3.71 |
| Rubbing | 193 | 47.80 |
| Washing | 191 | 47.28 |
| None | 20 | 4.92 |
| Rubbing | 52 | 12.87 |
| Washing | 341 | 84.40 |
| None | 11 | 2.72 |
| Yes | 30 | 7.42 |
| No | 374 | 92.57 |
| Yes | 265 | 65.60 |
| No | 139 | 34.40 |
| Yes | 385 | 95.30 |
| No | 19 | 4.70 |
| Yes | 335 | 82.92 |
| No | 69 | 17.07 |
| Yes | 200 | 49.50 |
| No | 204 | 50.49 |
| Yes | 209 | 51.73 |
| No | 142 | 35.14 |
| I don't know | 53 | 13.12 |
| Yes | 216 | 53.46 |
| No | 188 | 46.53 |
| 2-4 times | 95 | 23.51 |
| 4-6 times | 82 | 20.29 |
| 6-8 times | 60 | 14.85 |
| 8-10 times | 69 | 17.07 |
| >10 times | 98 | 24.26 |
| 2-4 times | 11 | 2.72 |
| 4-6 times | 39 | 9.66 |
| 6-8 times | 60 | 14.85 |
| 8-10 times | 66 | 16.33 |
| >10 times | 228 | 56.44 |
| 100% | 226 | 55.94 |
| 75% | 123 | 30.45 |
| 50% | 36 | 8.91 |
| 25% | 19 | 4.70 |
| Yes | 396 | 98.01 |
| No | 8 | 1.99 |
| It will kill the germs | 365 | 90.35 |
| It will not kill the germs | 39 | 9.65 |
| Yes | 131 | 32.42 |
| No | 273 | 67.57 |
| Forgetting | 59 | 14.60 |
| Forgetting, unavailability | 15 | 3.72 |
| Hand dryness, forgetting | 125 | 30.94 |
| Hand dryness, forgetting, unavailability | 8 | 1.98 |
| Hand dryness, time consuming, forgetting | 36 | 8.91 |
| Hand dryness, unavailability, strong smell of the products | 31 | 7.67 |
| None | 116 | 28.71 |
| What's adherence percentage difference at the start of COVID outbreak and now | ||
| 100% | 84 | 20.79 |
| 75% | 112 | 27.72 |
| 50% | 73 | 18.06 |
| 25% | 135 | 33.41 |
| Yes | 98 | 24.25 |
| No | 305 | 75.50 |
| Not sure | 1 | 0.25 |
| Close contact to COVID positive patient | 93 | 94.90 |
| Don't know | 05 | 5.10 |
| Somehow | 147 | 36.38 |
| Yes | 125 | 30.94 |
| No | 132 | 32.67 |
| Yes | 351 | 86.88 |
| No | 14 | 3.46 |
| Probably | 39 | 9.65 |
HHP= Hand hygiene practice, percentage are shown in parenthesis, N = Number of participants.
Shows the importance of hand hygiene, its adherence and changes in hand hygiene practice after COVID-19 pandemic
The Chi square test was performed to examine the importance of hand hygiene, its adherence, and changes in hand hygiene following the COVID-19 pandemic among the various levels of professionals. HHP = hand hygiene practice, percentage are shown in parenthesis, and bold values were significant at p < 0.05. N= Number of respondents.
| Professional's ranks | Importance of HHP (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 404 | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | |
| Consultant (170) | 81 (20.04) | 38 (9.40) | 27 (6.68) | 24 (5.94) | |
| Resident (129) | 54 (13.36) | 47 (11.63) | 17 (4.20) | 11 (2.72) | |
| Specialist (105) | 50 (12.37) | 18 (4.45) | 21 (5.19) | 16 (3.96) | |
| Consultant (170) | 106 (26.23) | 41 (10.14) | 12 (2.97) | 11 (2.72) | |
| Resident (129) | 57 (14.10) | 55 (13.61) | 14 (3.46) | 03 (0.74) | |
| Specialist (105) | 59 (14.60) | 29 (7.17) | 12 (2.97) | 05 (1.23) | |
| Consultant (170) | 46 (8.29) | 41 (10.14) | 21 (5.19) | 62 (15.34) | |
| Resident (129) | 19 (4.70) | 38 (9.40) | 31 (7.67) | 41 (10.14) | |
| Specialist (105) | 61 (15.09) | 27 (6.69) | 11 (2.71) | 05 (1.23) | |
Fig. 1Showed location of the respondent residence.
Fig. 2Showed the comparison of attitudes of respondents toward the use of alcohol and soap at various time intervals, N = 404 where N = total number of respondents.
Fig. 3Showed the comparison of respondents' perceptions of associated risk factors for SARS CoV-2 transmission, N = 404 where N = total number of respondents.
Fig. 4Showed the comparison of the duration of hand rubbing and washing at various time interval, N = 400 where N = total number of respondents.