Literature DB >> 36092773

Early Postoperative Complications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis of 38,234 Patients.

Daniel Badin1, Carlos D Ortiz-Babilonia1, Andrew B Harris1, Micheal Raad1, Julius K Oni1.   

Abstract

Background: The outcomes of total joint arthroplasty during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are unknown. We sought to compare early postoperative complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who had THA or TKA in the latter halves (July to December) of 2019 and 2020 were identified. Patients were divided into pre-COVID-19 (2019) and during-COVID-19 (2020) cohorts. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were used to detect correlations between operative period and outcomes. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.
Results: A total of 38,234 THA and 61,956 TKA patients were included. There was a significantly higher rate of outpatient procedures in 2020 than that in 2019 for both THA (41.68% vs 6.59%, P < .001) and TKA (41.68% vs 7.56%, P < .001). On matched analysis, surgery in 2020 had lower odds of hospital stay for >1 day (THA: odds ratio [OR] 0.889; P < .001) (TKA: OR 0.644; P < .001) and nonhome discharge (THA: 0.655; P < .001) (TKA: 0.497; P < .001). There was also increased odds of superficial surgical site infection in THA (OR 1.272; P = .040) and myocardial infarction in TKA patients (OR 1.488; P = .042) in 2020 compared to those in 2019. There was no difference in the 15 other outcomes assessed. Conclusions: Total joint arthroplasty surgery remains safe despite the COVID-19 pandemic. A statistically significant increase was detected in superficial surgical site infection and myocardial infarction risk during 2020 compared to 2019; however, the clinical significance of this is questionable. A shift away from inpatient stay was also present, possibly reflecting efforts to minimize nosocomial exposure to COVID-19.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Covid-19; Hip arthroplasty; Knee arthroplasty; Prognosis

Year:  2022        PMID: 36092773      PMCID: PMC9444499          DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroplast Today        ISSN: 2352-3441


Introduction

The first case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States (US) was reported in January 2020 [1]. During this first wave, entities such as the American College of Surgeons (ACS) and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) published guidelines recommending that non-emergent surgeries be deferred, and resources be redirected to critical care efforts and personnel to accommodate incoming COVID-19 patients [[2], [3], [4]]. Fields with predominantly elective procedures, such as orthopaedic surgery, were most significantly affected [5], with a recent study by Mattingly et al. reporting a 64% decrease in musculoskeletal procedures during the initial 2020 shutdown [6]. Of these, joint arthroplasty procedures were the most impacted with an alarming surgical volume decrease of 89.5% [6]. With such significant decreases in joint arthroplasty procedures during the initial 2020 shutdown [6], patients requiring joint replacement surgeries were left with disabling pain and limited mobility [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. Although there was clearly a necessity to resume elective orthopaedic procedures such as total joint replacements, there was also unease about the repercussions of performing surgery during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic [11,12]. During the peak of the pandemic in 2020, some authors reported increased morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) being the most common post-operative complication [[11], [12], [13]]. This, in addition to the risk of infection transmission to staff and other patients made resumption of elective procedures controversial [14]. Several authors and organizations drafted guidelines to minimize these risks as elective surgeries resumed [15,16]. Recommendations included only accommodating COVID-19 patients if the institution had sufficient staff and resources. Additionally, patients diagnosed or exposed to COVID-19 should have their surgeries rescheduled and follow the appropriate CDC recommendations [[15], [16], [17]]. Despite the measures taken to ensure that only COVID-19 free patients undergo elective orthopaedic surgery, it is plausible that patient outcomes could have been affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, the aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term postoperative outcomes of patients that underwent elective total joint arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that the rate of early postoperative complications in elective TJA surgery will not differ significantly between the pre-COVID-19 and during-COVID-19 pandemic cohorts.

Materials and Methods

This study did not require institutional review board approval or exemption as it was an analysis of publicly available, deidentified data.

Data source

We utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database for this study. NSQIP is a multi-center, national, risk-adjusted database containing prospectively collected preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables and outcomes [18].

Patient Selection

We included patients with current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for THA (27130) and/or TKA (27447), and International Classification of Disease-Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes for osteoarthritis of the hip (M16, M160–M165, M169) and/or knee (M170–M175, M179). We excluded patients with CPT codes for revision arthroplasty (27486, 27487, 27138, 27137, 27134). For each procedure, we compared outcomes in 2020 (during-COVID-19) to outcomes in 2019 (pre-COVID-19). To capture the period after which elective surgery resumed in 2020, we only included patients undergoing procedures in quarters three and four of both years (July-December).

Preoperative and Perioperative Characteristics

Preoperative variables collected were demographic data (age, gender, weight, and height) and comorbidities including smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), diabetes mellitus, disseminated cancer, preoperative steroid or immunosuppressant use, bleeding disorder, preoperative anemia, preoperative transfusion, and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Classification. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for all patients. We classified preoperative anemia as hematocrit < 36 and 39 for females and males respectively. According to NSQIP, diabetes mellitus is defined as being on insulin or non-insulin anti-diabetic agent. Perioperative variables assessed were wound classification, and inpatient vs outpatient procedure.

Postoperative Outcomes

The ASC-NSQIP database documents postoperative outcomes and complications up to 30-days following surgery. Postoperative outcomes assessed included the following adverse events: superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, wound dehiscence, pneumonia, unplanned reintubation, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or thrombophlebitis, failure to extubate, urinary tract infection (UTI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction (MI), sepsis, acute kidney injury, unplanned reoperation, prolonged hospital stay (>30 days), unplanned readmission, and 30-day mortality. We also evaluated for differences in hospital stay more than one day and discharge to rehab or acute care facility.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive analyses were performed for pre- and perioperative variables and outcomes. Univariate analysis, including Student’s T-test and Pearson's chi-square test, was used to identify differences in continuous and categorical variables respectively. Since we were investigating the safety of arthroplasty, we wanted to increase the sensitivity of our analysis. Therefore, we set statistical significance at α = 0.05 rather than 0.01. To compare outcomes between 2020 and 2019, propensity score matching was performed. TKA and THA cohorts were analyzed separately. The propensity score was derived from a logistic regression model. All pre- and peri-operative variables were included in the propensity score model. We performed a nearest neighbor one-to-one matching between the 2020 and 2019 cohorts with no replacement. To compare postoperative outcomes, we then performed a bivariate logistic analysis of the unmatched cohorts and a multi-variable logistic regression analysis of the matched cohorts. All pre- and perioperative variables which were different between the matched cohorts at a P-value < 0.1 were included in the multi model. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata (StataCorp. 2019.Stata Statistical Software: Release 16.1.College Station, TX: StataCorp LP).

Source of funding

No funding was received or used for this project.

Results

Study Samples

In the latter half of 2020, 17,805 THA and 26,970 TKA cases were performed, compared to 20,429 THA and 34,976 TKA cases in 2019. Notably, 41.68% of THA cases and 45.20% of TKA cases were performed on an outpatient basis in 2020 compared to 6.59% of THA cases (P < 0.0001) and 27.95% of TKA (P < 0.0001) in 2019. ASA classification and proportion of outpatient procedures were significantly different between the unmatched THA cohorts, while age, proportion of patients with hypertension, proportion of patients with COPD, and proportion of outpatient procedures were significantly different between the unmatched TKA cohorts. Detailed demographic and preoperative data are presented in Table 1 and Table 2 .
Table 1

Total Hip Arthroplasty Patient and Procedure Characteristics

Unmatched Cohort (N=38,234)
Matched Cohort (N=35,604)
2019 (N=20,429)2020 (N=17,805)P-value2019 (N=17,802)2020 (N=17,802)P-value
Age, mean [SD]66.08 [10.61]66.01 [10.50]0.52867.07 [10.47]66.01 [10.50]0.000
Female, n (%)11,163 (54.65%)9,573 (53.77%)0.0859,825 (55.19%)9,571 (53.76%)0.007
BMI, mean [SD]30.55 [6.12]30.52 [6.16]0.56830.75 [6.34]30.52 [6.16]0.001
Smoker, n (%)2,222 (10.88%)1,918 (10.77%)0.7431,974 (11.09%)1,918 (10.77%)0.342
HTN, n (%)11,257 (55.10%)9,778 (54.92%)0.71610,169 (57.12%)9,775 (54.91%)0.000
CHF, n (%)72 (0.35%)77 (0.43%)0.21072 (0.40%)77 (0.43%)0.681
COPD, n (%)954 (4.67%)769 (4.32%)0.099904 (5.08%)769 (4.32%)0.001
ESRD, n (%)33 (0.16%)32 (0.18%)0.66732 (0.18%)32 (0.18%)1.000
Bleeding disorder, n (%)367 (1.80%)296 (1.66%)0.317323 (1.81%)296 (1.66%)0.274
Disseminated cancer, n (%)47 (0.23%)42 (0.24%)0.90638 (0.21%)42 (0.24%)0.654
Diabetes, n (%)2,537 (12.42%)2,257 (12.68%)0.4482,419 (13.59%)2,254 (12.66%)0.010
1Preoperative anemia, n(%)3,143 (15.38%)2,827 (15.88%)0.1863,033 (17.04%)2,826 (15.87%)0.003
Transfused preoperatively, n (%)8 (0.04%)4 (0.02%)0.3581 (0.01%)4 (0.02%)0.180
Steroid/immunosuppressant use, n (%)617 (3.02%)557 (3.13%)0.541610 (3.43%)557 (3.13%)0.115
Wound classification, n (%)0.5540.714
 Clean20,379 (99.76%)17,752 (99.70%)17,754 (99.73%)17,749 (99.70%)
 Clean/Contaminated43 (0.21%)46 (0.26%)41 (0.23%)46 (0.26%)
 Contaminated7 (0.03%)6 (0.03%)7 (0.04%)6 (0.03%)
 Dirty/Infected01 (0.01%)01 (0.01%)
ASA class, n (%)0.0150.000
 1649 (3.18%)523 (2.94%)353 (1.98%)523 (2.94%)
 210,473 (51.27%)9,073 (50.96%)8,150 (45.78%)9,073 (50.97%)
 38,977 (43.94%)7,850 (44.09%)8,696 (50,38%)7,847 (44.08%)
 4330 (1.62%)359 (2.02%)330 (1.85%)359 (2.02%)
Outpatient procedure, n (%)1,346 (6.59%)7,422 (41.68%)0.0001,345 (7.56%)7,420 (41.68%)0.000

SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ESRD, end stage renal disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists

Significant values are in bold

Anemia was defined as hematocrit < 36 and 39 for females and males respectively

Table 2

Total Knee Arthroplasty Patient and Procedure Characteristics

Unmatched Cohort (N=61,956)
Matched Cohort (N=53,940)
2019 (N=34,976)2020 (N=26,970)P-value2019 (N=26,970)2020 (N=26,970)P-value
Age, mean [SD]67.47 [9.09]66.90 [9.16]0.00066.67 [9.26]66.90 [9.16]0.004
Female, n (%)21,285 (60.86%)16,223 (60.15%)0.07616,240 (60.22%)16,223 (60.15%)0.881
BMI, mean [SD]32.93 [6.46]33.00 [6.57]0.18233.09 [6.57]33.00 [6.57]0.115
Smoker, n (%)2,591 (7.41%)1,954 (7.24%)0.4401,981 (7.35%)1,954 (7.24%)0.655
HTN, n (%)22,314 (63.79%)16,723 (61.99%)0.00016,320 (60.51%)16,723 (61.99%)0.000
CHF, n (%)162 (0.46%)109 (0.40%)0.270100 (0.37%)109 (0.40%)0.533
COPD, n (%)1,988 (5.68%)1,399 (5.19%)0.0071,371 (5.08%)1,399 (5.19%)0.585
ESRD, n (%)62 (0.18%)55 (0.20%)0.44961 (0.23%)55 (0.20%)0.577
Bleeding disorder, n (%)619 (1.77%)483 (1.79%)0.844450 (1.67%)483 (1.79%)0.279
Disseminated cancer, n (%)53 (0.15%)42 (0.16%)0.89543 (0.16%)42 (0.16%)0.914
Diabetes, n (%)6,528 (18.66%)4,848 (17.98%)0.0294,770 (17.69%)4,848 (17.98%)0.380
1Preoperative anemia, n(%)5,677 (16.23%)4,396 (16.30%)0.8214,528 (16.79%)4,396 (16.30%)0.126
Transfused preoperatively, n (%)7 (0.02%)8 (0.03%)0.4447 (0.03%)8 (0.03%)0.796
Steroid/immunosuppressant use, n (%)1,138 (3.25%)937 (3.47%)0.1311,000 (3.71%)937 (3.47%)0.145
Wound classification, n (%)0.0190.533
 Clean34,872 (99.69%)26,921 (99.80%)26,919 (99.81%)26,921 (99.80%)
 Clean/Contaminated93 (0.27%)40 (0.15%)41 (0.15%)40 (0.15%)
 Contaminated14 (0.04%12 (0.04%)10 (0.04%)12 (0.04%)
 Dirty/Infected2 (0.01%)2 (0.01%)02 (0.01%)
ASA Class, n (%)0.4710.001
 1540 (1.54%)417 (1.55%)347 (1.29%)417 (1.55%)
 216,271 (46.51%)12,397 (45.96%)12,098 (44.86%)12,397 (45.96%)
 317,585 (50.27%)13,683 (50.72%)13,997 (51.90%)13,683 (50.72%)
 4585(1.67%)478 (1.77%)528 (1.96%)478 (1.77%)
Outpatient procedure, n (%)9,777 (27.95%)12,192 (45.20%)0.0009,777 (36.25%)12,192 (45.20%)0.000

SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ESRD, end stage renal disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists

Significant values are in bold

Anemia was defined as hematocrit < 36 and 39 for females and males respectively

Total Hip Arthroplasty Patient and Procedure Characteristics SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ESRD, end stage renal disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists Significant values are in bold Anemia was defined as hematocrit < 36 and 39 for females and males respectively Total Knee Arthroplasty Patient and Procedure Characteristics SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; HTN, hypertension; CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ESRD, end stage renal disease; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists Significant values are in bold Anemia was defined as hematocrit < 36 and 39 for females and males respectively

Matched Samples

The matched THA samples included 17,802 cases in 2020 and 17,802 cases in 2019. The matched TKA samples included 26,970 cases in 2020 and 26,970 cases in 2019. Age, gender, BMI, ASA class, and certain comorbidities (hypertension, COPD, diabetes, preoperative anemia) remained statistically different between the matched THA cohorts, with the 2020 cohort having lower age, BMI, females, and comorbidities. Meanwhile, age, ASA class, and proportion of hypertensive patients remained statistically different between the matched TKA cohorts, with age, proportion of hypertensive patients, and ASA classes 1 and 2 being higher in the 2020 sample. For both the TKA and THA matched cohorts, ratio of outpatient procedures was significantly higher in 2020. Detailed demographic and preoperative data of the matched cohorts are presented in Table 1 and Table 2. The incidence of the various postoperative outcomes is presented in Table 3 . The overall complication rate for the THA cohort was 5.17% and 5.10% in 2019 and 2020 respectively (P=0.743). The overall complication rate for the TKA cohort was 5.48% and 5.25% in 2019 and 2020 respectively (P=0.212). There was no difference between 2020 and 2019 in the rates of any adverse event assessed (Table 3). However, patients treated in 2020 had a significantly lower rate of hospital stay > 1 day (THA: 28.78% vs 42.46%; P<0.001) (TKA: 32.72% vs 48.98%; P<0.001) and non-home discharge (THA: 5.25% vs 8.86%; P<0.001) (TKA: 4.83% vs 9.13%; P<0.001). Bivariate logistic regression of the unmatched samples also showed lower odds of hospital stay > 1 day and non-home discharge for both THA and TKA cohorts in 2020 with no difference in any of the analyzed adverse events (Table 4 ).
Table 3

Incidence of Adverse Events in Unmatched Cohorts

Total Hip Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty
2019 (N=20,429)2020 (N=17,805)P-value2019 (N=34,976)2020 (N=26,970)P-value
Any adverse event5.17%5.10%0.7435.48%5.25%0.212
 Superficial SSI0.86%0.97%0.2381.29%1.19%0.265
 Deep SSI0.12%0.15%0.4410.07%0.08%0.672
 Dehiscence0.14%0.15%0.8050.19%0.26%0.063
 Pneumonia0.23%0.17%0.1510.26%0.24%0.687
 Reintubation0.08%0.08%0.8750.09%0.08%0.565
 Pulmonary embolism0.20%0.23%0.4650.37%0.32%0.279
 DVT/thrombophlebitis0.34%0.28%0.3190.58%0.62%0.606
 Failure to extubate0.04%0.02%0.1990.04%0.04%0.995
 Urinary tract infection0.69%0.62%0.4210.63%0.65%0.682
 Stroke/CVA0.07%0.08%0.5780.08%0.05%0.146
 Arrest0.04%0.06%0.5960.05%0.06%0.946
 Myocardial infarction0.18%0.19%0.9230.18%0.24%0.140
 Sepsis0.19%0.14%0.2280.18%0.13%0.150
 Unplanned reoperation1.70%1.60%0.4320.97%0.94%0.674
 Unplanned 30-day readmission3.01%2.88%0.4562.76%2.58%0.175
 30-day mortality0.07%0.10%0.3560.07%0.09%0.541
 Acute kidney injury0.03%0.03%0.9760.03%0.04%0.414
Hospital stay > 1 day42.46%28.78%0.00048.98%32.72%0.000
Discharge to rehab or acute care facility8.86 %5.25%0.0009.13 %4.83%0.000

SSI, surgical site infection; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; CVA, cerebral vascular accident

Significant values are in bold

Table 4

Bivariate Logistic Regression Models of Unmatched Cohorts (2020 vs 2019)

Total Hip Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty
OR95% CIP-valueOR95% CIP-value
Any adverse event0.985[0.899- 1.079]0.7430.956[0.891- 1.026]0.891
 Superficial SSI1.136[0.919-1.402]0.4420.921[0.798-1.064]0.265
 Deep SSI1.243[0.713-2.166]0.4411.135[0.632-2.039]0.672
 Dehiscence1.068[0.632-1.805]0.8051.378[0.981-1.933]0.064
 Pneumonia0.717[0.454-1.131]0.1530.936[0.680-1.289]0.687
 Reintubation0.945[0.465-1.917]0.8750.851[0.491-1.476]0.566
 Pulmonary embolism1.176[0.761-1.819]0.4650.861[0.656-1.129]0.279
 DVT/thrombophlebitis0.831[0.577-1.196]0.3191.055[0.859-1.296]0.606
 Failure to extubate0.430[0.114-1.622]0.2130.997[0.437-2.275]0.995
 Urinary tract infection0.902[0.703-1.158]0.4211.042[0.854-1.272]0.682
 Stroke/CVA1.229[0.593-2.548]0.5780.625[0.330-1.184]0.150
 Arrest1.275[0.518-3.138]0.5971.023[0.520-2.015]0.946
 Myocardial infarction1.023[0.640-1.637]0.9231.297[0.917-1.835]0.141
 Sepsis0.735[0.444-1.215]0.2300.741[0.492-1.116]0.151
 Unplanned reoperation0.937[0.802-1.099]0.4320.965[0.820-1.137]0.674
 Unplanned 30-day readmission0.955[0.849-1.077]0.4560.934[0.846-1.031]0.175
 30-day mortality1.394[0.687-2.830]0.3581.193[0.677-2.102]0.541
 Acute kidney injury0.983[0.547-2.408]0.9761.423[0.605-3.359]0.416
Hospital stay > 1 day0.548[0.525-0.572]0.0000.507[0.490-0.524]0.000
Discharge to rehab or acute care facility0.570[0.525-0.619]0.0000.505[0.472-0.539]0.000

SSI, surgical site infection; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; CVA, cerebral vascular accident

Significant values are in bold

Incidence of Adverse Events in Unmatched Cohorts SSI, surgical site infection; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; CVA, cerebral vascular accident Significant values are in bold Bivariate Logistic Regression Models of Unmatched Cohorts (2020 vs 2019) SSI, surgical site infection; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; CVA, cerebral vascular accident Significant values are in bold As the matched cohorts had significant differences in baseline characteristics, we performed a multivariate logistic regression of the matched cohorts controlling for all statistically different baseline characteristics. The multivariate models are outlined in Table 5 . Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased odds of superficial SSI in THA patients (OR 1.272; CI [1.101-1.602]; P=0.040) and myocardial infarction in TKA patients (OR 1.488; CI [1.014-2.184]; P=0.042) that underwent surgery in 2020 compared to 2019. There was also a decreased odds of hospital stay > 1 day (THA: OR 0.889; CI [0.847-0.935]; P<0.001) (TKA: OR 0.644; CI [0.620-0.669]; P<0.001) and discharge to rehab or acute care facility (THA: OR 0.655; CI [0.589-0.731]; P<0.001) (TKA: OR 0.497; CI [0.455-0.543]; P<0.001) in 2020. No other significant associations were present.
Table 5

Multivariate Logistic Regression Models of Matched Cohorts (2020 vs 2019)

Total Hip Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty
OR95% CIP-valueOR95% CIP-value
Any adverse event1.048[0. 948-1.159]0. 3621.008[0.935-1.089]0.821
 Superficial SSI1.272[1.101-1.602]0.0401.026[0.877-1.200]0.746
 Deep SSI1.623[0.884-3.003]0.1181.180[0.631-2.203]0.604
 Dehiscence1.114[0.625-1.986]0.7141.328[0.924-1.907]0.125
 Pneumonia0.802[0.492-1.310]0.3791.056[0.744-1.496]0.760
 Reintubation1.206[0.578-2.517]0.6180.959[0.529-1.736]0.889
 Pulmonary embolism1.506[0.937-2.418]0.0910.952[0.710-1.275]0.742
 DVT/thrombophlebitis0.998[0.674-1.479]0.9931.034[0.831-1.286]0.764
 Failure to extubate0.471[0.113-1.968]0.3021.021[0.424-2.462]0.962
 Urinary tract infection0.769[0.580-1.019]0.0681.058[0.854-1.310]0.604
 Stroke/CVA1.571[0.744-3.319]0.2360.662[0.338-1.297]0.230
 Arrest1.541[0.597-3.975]0.3711.214[0.576-2.558]0.609
 Myocardial infarction1.217[0.739-2.002]0.4401.488[1.014-2.184]0.042
 Sepsis0.778[0.446-1.360]0.3790.722[0.469-1.113]0.140
 Unplanned reoperation0.997[0.839-1.185]0.9750.954[0.802-1.134]0.597
 Unplanned 30-day readmission1.004[0.879-1.145]0.9550.949[0.854-1.055]0.336
 30-day mortality1.449[0.674-3.118]0.3421.423[0.746-2.716]0.284
 Acute kidney injury1.272[0.411-3.937]0.6761.294[0.519-3.229]0.580
Hospital stay > 1 day0.889[0.847-0.935]0.0000.644[0.620-0.669]0.000
Discharge to rehab or acute care facility0.655[0.589-0.731]0.0000.497[0.455-0.543]0.000

SSI, surgical site infection; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; CVA, cerebral vascular accident

Significant values are in bold

Multivariate Logistic Regression Models of Matched Cohorts (2020 vs 2019) SSI, surgical site infection; DVT, deep venous thrombosis; CVA, cerebral vascular accident Significant values are in bold

Discussion

As we continue to learn about COVID-19, experts are increasingly suspecting the evolution of this virus into an endemic pathogen [20]. With that in mind, it is important to assess the safety of orthopaedic surgery during the COVID-19 era. In this analysis of TJA postoperative outcomes before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, we found no difference in the 18 postoperative complications assessed on unmatched bivariate analysis. Matched multivariable analysis demonstrated a small increase in superficial SSI and myocardial infarction rates in THA and TKA respectively in 2020. Overall, our results suggest that short-term complications in TJA surgery were not significantly different before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Several previous studies have reported increased mortality in COVID-19 patients undergoing surgical treatment [[11], [12], [13],21]. Kayani et al. found a 20% increase in mortality rates in patients with COVID-19 that underwent THA for hip fractures [13]. Haffner et al. analyzed 10,940 patients undergoing various procedures and found that COVID-19 patients were twice as likely to die postoperatively compared to their healthy counterparts [21]. Nonetheless, as opposed to these studies which analyzed COVID-19 patients specifically, we found no increase in postoperative mortality in 2020 among all patients who underwent arthroplasty. This suggests that guidelines and safety precautions, such as preoperative COVID-19 screening, were successful in mitigating complications associated with performing surgery on COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, our findings support a previous study by Kader et al. which estimated that the overall probability of a patient admitted for elective orthopaedic surgery having a false negative preoperative test leading to postoperative mortality would be around 1 in every 7,000 (or 0.01%) [22]. This small rate of mortality would also help explain why we did not find an increase in mortality in patients undergoing TJA in 2020. Furthermore, the risk of postoperative death by nosocomial COVID-19 infection has also been shown to be low in several clinical studies [23,24]. We found a slightly increased risk of superficial SSI in patients undergoing THA in 2020 compared to 2019. To our knowledge, there is no literature directly associating COVID-19 infection with an increased risk of SSI. One explanation may be decreased follow-up of patients undergoing hip replacement during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is known that clinical outpatient visits decreased during the start of the pandemic due in part to patient fear of contracting COVID-19 [25,26]. The decreased clinical supervision could have led to inappropriate wound care by patients. Even though telemedicine visits have been shown to be effective in diagnosing and following SSIs [27], they may have not been able to compensate for the decrease in outpatient visits. Patel et al. analyzed the visit patterns of almost 17 million commercial insurance enrollees and found that total outpatient visits, including in-person and telemedicine visits, decreased by 9.1%, with decreases in total visit rates by state ranging from 16% to 73% after expansion of telehealth coverage by Medicare [25]. Despite the statistical significance, the clinical significance of this increased superficial SSI risk is questionable as the magnitude of increase was minimal (OR 1.272) and superficial SSI is often treatable. Further, the reporting of SSI may have been inconsistent, as many of these patients were treated on outpatient basis. With these considerations, this small increase may be interesting if reproducible but unlikely to be compelling or actionable at this time. We also found an increased risk of MI in patients undergoing TKA in 2020. COVID-19 infection is strongly associated with a pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic state, leading to an increased theoretical risk of MI [28]. Our finding of increased post-operative MI incidence in 2020 could be related to a small percentage of patients with COVID-19 who were missed during preoperative screening. Furthermore, patients previously hospitalized with severe COVID-19 were found to have a high prevalence (40%) of occult cardiac ischemia/infarction on perfusion analysis even after complete recovery [28]. This could suggest that even recovered COVID-19 patients may have an increased predisposition for coronary syndromes when the heart is stressed with surgery. This could explain the increased risk of MI we found despite rigorous preoperative screening. However, it is difficult to make any conclusions without accounting for COVID-19 status in the analysis. Future studies should reevaluate this and focus on the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19, as this can have large implications on patient selection for elective, non-urgent procedures. Interestingly, on both matched and unmatched analyses, the 2020 cohort was much more likely to undergo THA and TKA on an outpatient basis, and was less likely to have non-home discharge and hospital stay more than 1 day. This probably is a result of efforts to decrease patient stay in locations, such as hospitals and rehab/care centers, where there is a possibility of COVID-19 exposure [29]. Additionally, utilization of outpatient centers such as ambulatory surgery centers has been recommended to allow isolation of healthy patients undergoing elective surgery from COVID-19 patients, and to relieve some load from the COVID-19 strained hospital systems [30,31]. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services also agreed to cover outpatient arthroplasty procedures as of January 2020 [32]. This shift to outpatient TJA surgery is supported by recent literature showing no increased complication rates compared to inpatient surgery [33]. This study has several limitations. Firstly, as with any retrospective analysis, only association can be established and not causation. Secondly, we were limited by the variables recorded in NSQIP, and could not determine the COVID-19 status of included patients or account for other confounders that may have affected our findings. Thirdly, NSQIP only records complications within 30 days, resulting in underestimation of possible longer-term complications. Fourthly, variability in reporting is likely present in any large database. As such, inaccuracies may have been introduced to our analysis due to reporting differences. Finally, we could not account for other consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, such as decreased availability of healthcare workers and supplies and economic decline, which could have affected patient outcomes. Despite these limitations, this is, to our knowledge, the first study to assess the safety of TJA during COVID-19 pandemic using a large national database.

Conclusions

Broadly, THA and TKA short-term complications remained largely similar to pre-pandemic rates during 2020. A statistically significant increase in superficial SSI and MI risk was present in 2020; however, further studies are required to determine the clinical significance and persistence of this finding. There was also a shift away from inpatient surgery in 2020, possibly reflecting efforts to avoid nosocomial exposure of patient to COVID-19. Our current findings suggest that TJA procedures may be safely carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic without a substantially increased risk of most short-term postoperative complications.

Conflict of Interests

☐ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. ☒ The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Julius K. Oni has the following conflict of interest to declare: AAOS Knee Program Committee: Board or committee member AAHKS Humanitarian Committee: Board or committee member DePuy Synthes: Paid consultant Zimmer Biomet: Paid consultant Fellowship Support (Omega, Smith and Nephew): Other financial or material support from a company or supplier All other Authors have no conflict of interest to declare. No funding was received in support of this work.

Uncited reference

[19].
  23 in total

1.  The effects of COVID-19 on perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Elliot Onochie; Vijay Patil; Fahima Begum; Rory Cuthbert; David Ferguson; Jagmeet S Bhamra; Aadhar Sharma; Peter Bates; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Reemergence of Multispecialty Inpatient Elective Orthopaedic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidelines for a New Normal.

Authors:  Afshin A Anoushiravani; C Lowry Barnes; Joseph A Bosco; Kevin J Bozic; James I Huddleston; James D Kang; John E Ready; Paul Tornetta; Richard Iorio
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Recent Increases in Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Have Not Increased Early Complications.

Authors:  David E DeMik; Christopher N Carender; James G Kohler; Qiang An; Timothy S Brown; Nicholas A Bedard
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Changes in pain, stiffness and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis waiting for hip or knee joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  H Kapstad; T Rustøen; B R Hanestad; T Moum; N Langeland; K Stavem
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Pain and function deteriorate in patients awaiting total joint arthroplasty that has been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jurek Rafal Tomasz Pietrzak; Zia Maharaj; Magdalena Erasmus; Nkhodiseni Sikhauli; Josip Nenad Cakic; Lipalo Mokete
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-18

6.  'Worse than death' and waiting for a joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  C E H Scott; D J MacDonald; C R Howie
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 7.  Acute Myocardial Infarction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Update on Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes.

Authors:  Olga Toscano; Nicola Cosentino; Jeness Campodonico; Antonio L Bartorelli; Giancarlo Marenzi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-23

8.  Trends in US Surgical Procedures and Health Care System Response to Policies Curtailing Elective Surgical Operations During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Aviva S Mattingly; Liam Rose; Hyrum S Eddington; Amber W Trickey; Mark R Cullen; Arden M Morris; Sherry M Wren
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-12-01

9.  Recommendations to Optimize the Safety of Elective Surgical Care While Limiting the Spread of COVID-19: Primum Non Nocere.

Authors:  Ron Gilat; Eric D Haunschild; Tracy Tauro; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-04-27

10.  We Asked the Experts: Covid-19 Outbreak: Is There Still a Place for Scheduled Surgery? "Reflection from Pathophysiological Data".

Authors:  Emmanuel Besnier; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Lilian Schwarz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.