| Literature DB >> 36092527 |
Rabab Hassan1, Naglaa Fathallah Ahmed2, Safaa Ismail Hussein3.
Abstract
Background: Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant drug accustomed to treat depressive disorders. It recorded many side effects on different tissues. Objective: To investigate reaction of Albino rats' periodontium after oral administration of Amitriptyline histologically and radiographically.Entities:
Keywords: Amitriptyline; BMD, bone mineral density; CBCT, cone beam computed tomography; Cone beam CT; DVT, dental volumetric tomography; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; HU value; HU value, Hounsfield unit value; OPN, Osteopontin; Osteopontin; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PDL, periodontal ligament; Periodontium; SD, standard deviation; SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; TCAs, tricyclic antidepressants; c.t, connective tissue; p-value, probability value
Year: 2022 PMID: 36092527 PMCID: PMC9453502 DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.06.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi Dent J ISSN: 1013-9052
Fig. 1(a)- CBCT of the mandibular specimen showing standardized areas to be evaluated (red arrows), mesial and distal to the second molar just below the CEJ. The HU value is measured in these two points then averaged. Photomicrographs of the control group showing (b)- Gingiva with keratinized stratified squamous epithelial covering. Thin and regular esinophilic keratin layer, clear cells (C). Dense and fibrous lamina propria with long and slender c.t papillae (P) and spindle shaped fibroblasts (FB). (c)- Alveolar process with regular margin, Haversian canal (arrow head) and fibrocellular marrow cavities (MC). Homogenous acellular cementum with even thickness (AC) and well organized PDL. (d)-Alveolar bone proper with plump osteoblasts lining (OB), numerous osteocytes lacunae (OC). Spindle shaped fibroblasts (FB) overlying PDL fibers. Cuboidal shaped cementoblasts lining the surface of acellular cementum (CB), incremental lines of Salter (S). (e)-Cellular cementum with cementocytes lacunae, some are plump (arrow) while others are flattened (arrow head), (H&E, original magnification, (b, d & e) ×400, (c) ×200).
Fig. 2Photomicrographs of experimental group showing: (a)-Gingiva with basal cells with pyknotic nuclei (B) resting on ill-defined basement membrane. Cells with clear cytoplasm and pyknotic nuclei (arrow heads) and few mitotic figures (M). Areas of disintegration in c.t. papillae (D). (b)-Cell nests (arrows) and detached keratin layer (arrow heads). (c)-Alveolar process with irregular margin, areas of separation in bone (arrow heads) and reversal lines (R). Acellular cementum with uneven thickness (AC). Detectable increase in PDL thickness with detachment of PDL from bone and cementum at some regions (arrows). (d)-Degeneration of some regions in acellular cementum (arrow head) and absence of cementoblastic lining. Disorganized PDL with few widened blood vessels (arrow). (e)-Areas of degeneration in PDL (arrows). Cellular cementum with cementocytes lacunae some empty (arrow head), while others showing pyknotic nuclei (P). Scalloped alveolar bone margin (S). (f)- Osteoclasts in Howship’s lacunae (arrows). (H&E, original magnification, (a, b, d, e & f) x400, (c) x200).
Fig. 3Photomicrographs showing: (a)- Gingiva of control group with positive immuno-reactivity in epithelium especially in basal and prickle cell layers (arrows). Note the presence of positive reaction in c.t. cells (arrow heads). (b)- Control group with very few positive immuno-reactions in cementocytes (CC), fibroblasts (FB), bone matrix (BM) and some staining in PDL fibers (arrow). (c)- Gingiva of experimental group with apparently increased immunopositivity in epithelium (arrows) and c.t. cells (arrow heads). (d)-Experimental group with positive immuno-staining in cementocytes (CC), osteoblasts (OB), cementum (CM) and bone (BM) matrices, fibroblasts (FB) and PDL fibers (arrow). (Anti-OPN, original magnification, (a & c) x200, (b & d) x400).
showing comparison between control and experimental groups according to area % of Anti-OPN immunoreactivity.
| Area % of Anti-OPN immunoreactivity | Control Group | Experimental Group | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 9.48 ± 4.21 | 14.62 ± 7.34 | −1.214 | 0.225 |
| Range | 1.59–13.07 | 7.09–27.98 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 1.16 ± 1.16 | 4.22 ± 3.07 | −2.747 | 0.006 |
| Range | 0.09–3.54 | 1.38–10.45 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 4.10 ± 2.95 | 19.57 ± 5.06 | −3.130 | 0.002 |
| Range | 0.03–7.15 | 12.87–28.36 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 0.52 ± 0.54 | 2.06 ± 1.27 | −2.492 | 0.013 |
| Range | 0.01–1.54 | 0.78–4.43 | ||
Using: U = Mann-Whitney test.
p-value > 0.05 NS.
p-value < 0.05 significant.
Fig. 4Bar charts showing comparison of mean and SD values between control and experimental groups (a)- Anti-OPN immunoreactivity area %. (b)- Relative HU value.
Showing comparison between control and experimental groups according to relative HU value.
| Relative HU value | Control Group | Experimental Group | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | 1457.71 ± 46.23 | 1267.14 ± 79.69 | 5.473 | <0.001 |
| Range | 1404–1527 | 1145–1350 |
Using: t-Independent Sample.
p-value < 0.001 highly significant.