| Literature DB >> 36092126 |
Arti Gupta1, Mounika Kollimarla1, Venkatashiva Reddy B1, Yusuf Noorani Shaik2, Rakesh Kakkar3, Rajeev Aravindakshan1.
Abstract
Introduction: Anemia is a serious public health issue in India, especially among women, adolescent girls, and young children. Tribal people reside mostly in remote underserved regions with little or no basic civic amenities which makes them a highly vulnerable group of Indians. The study aimed to identify unknown risk factors for anemia among tribal lactating mothers. Methodology: It was a mixed method prospective cohort study for 10 months carried out among 340 scheduled tribes (ST) mothers in 10 clusters in Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Data collection using a questionnaire, 24 hours dietary recall, anthropometric measurement, and hemoglobin estimation was done. Weekly local recipe talk in the mother's kitchen, informal group discussions, was conducted for 12 weeks after baseline data collection. The audio and video tapes of the weekly local recipe talk in the mothers kitchen were transcribed verbatim and then translated into English. The individual responses were grouped as barriers related to acceptability, availability, accessibility, use and utilization, appropriateness, and nutrition environment.Entities:
Keywords: anemia; dietary; iron; lactating mothers; tribes
Year: 2022 PMID: 36092126 PMCID: PMC9451507 DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S380159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Womens Health ISSN: 1179-1411
Figure 1Map showing the location of the study area. *Red Pointer indicates the studied cluster’s location.
Association of Selected Characteristics with Anemia Among Mothers at Baseline (n = 340)
| Variable | Category | Anemia Baseline | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemic | Non-Anemic | Total | Chi-Square | P-value | |||||
| N | % | n | % | n | % | ||||
| Age in years | ≤20* | 38 | 17.5 | 27 | 22.0 | 65 | 19.1 | 1.00 | 0.32 |
| > 20 | 179 | 82.5 | 96 | 78.0 | 275 | 80.9 | |||
| Age at Marriage in years | <18* | 47 | 21.7 | 29 | 23.6 | 76 | 22.4 | 0.17 | 0.68 |
| ≥18 | 170 | 78.3 | 94 | 76.4 | 264 | 77.6 | |||
| Age at menarche in years | <13* | 65 | 30.0 | 51 | 41.5 | 116 | 34.1 | 4.87 | 0.03^ |
| ≥13 | 152 | 70.0 | 71 | 57.7 | 223 | 65.6 | |||
| Residence | Urban* | 107 | 49.3 | 63 | 51.2 | 170 | 50.0 | 0.11 | 0.73 |
| Rural | 110 | 50.7 | 60 | 48.8 | 170 | 50.0 | |||
| Occupation | Homemaker* | 184 | 84.8 | 104 | 84.6 | 288 | 84.7 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Other | 33 | 15.2 | 19 | 15.4 | 52 | 15.3 | |||
| Education | Not literate* | 100 | 46.1 | 42 | 34.1 | 142 | 41.8 | 4.60 | 0.03 |
| Literate | 117 | 53.9 | 81 | 65.9 | 198 | 58.2 | |||
| Husband Occupation (n=337) | Labour* | 144 | 62.9 | 85 | 37.1 | 229 | 67.4 | 1.83 | 0.40 |
| Others | 73 | 64.8 | 38 | 35.2 | 108 | 31.8 | |||
| Husband Education (n=337) | Not literate* | 92 | 42.4 | 42 | 34.1 | 134 | 39.4 | 3.17 | 0.21 |
| Literate | 122 | 56.2 | 81 | 65.9 | 203 | 59.7 | |||
| Consanguious Marriage | Absent* | 126 | 58.1 | 75 | 61.0 | 201 | 59.1 | 0.28 | 0.60 |
| Present | 91 | 41.9 | 48 | 39.0 | 139 | 40.9 | |||
| Type of the family | Extended* | 98 | 45.2 | 55 | 44.7 | 153 | 45.0 | 0.01 | 0.94 |
| Nuclear | 119 | 54.8 | 68 | 55.3 | 187 | 55.0 | |||
| Socioeconomic Status | Lower or lower middle* | 180 | 82.9 | 93 | 75.6 | 273 | 80.3 | 2.67 | 0.10 |
| Others | 37 | 17.1 | 30 | 24.4 | 67 | 19.7 | |||
| Type of house | Kutcha or semi pucca* | 108 | 49.8 | 54 | 43.9 | 162 | 47.6 | 1.08 | 0.30 |
| Pucca | 109 | 50.2 | 69 | 56.1 | 178 | 52.4 | |||
| Overcrowding | Present* | 191 | 88.0 | 108 | 87.8 | 299 | 87.9 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
| Absent | 26 | 12.0 | 15 | 12.2 | 41 | 12.1 | |||
| Gravida | ≥3* | 86 | 39.6 | 36 | 29.3 | 122 | 35.9 | 3.66 | 0.06 |
| <3 | 131 | 60.4 | 87 | 70.7 | 218 | 64.1 | |||
| Parity | ≥3* | 157 | 72.4 | 101 | 82.1 | 258 | 75.9 | 5.70 | 0.06 |
| <3 | 60 | 27.6 | 22 | 17.9 | 82 | 24.1 | |||
| Place of delivery | Home* | 13 | 6.0 | 6 | 4.9 | 19 | 5.6 | 0.18 | 0.67 |
| Hospital | 204 | 94.0 | 117 | 95.1 | 321 | 94.4 | |||
| Previous any LSCS | Present* | 85 | 39.2 | 53 | 43.1 | 138 | 40.6 | 0.50 | 0.48 |
| Absent | 132 | 60.8 | 70 | 56.9 | 202 | 59.4 | |||
| Male child | Absent* | 85 | 39.2 | 49 | 39.8 | 134 | 39.4 | 0.01 | 0.90 |
| Present | 132 | 60.8 | 74 | 60.2 | 206 | 60.6 | |||
| Female child | Absent* | 65 | 30.0 | 38 | 30.9 | 103 | 30.3 | 0.03 | 0.86 |
| Present | 152 | 70.0 | 85 | 69.1 | 237 | 69.7 | |||
| Postnatal health facility visit | Absent* | 66 | 30.4 | 47 | 38.2 | 113 | 33.2 | 2.15 | 0.14 |
| Present | 151 | 69.6 | 76 | 61.8 | 227 | 66.8 | |||
| IFA tablets consumed after last child birth | Absent* | 153 | 70.5 | 76 | 61.8 | 229 | 67.4 | 2.71 | 0.10 |
| Present | 64 | 29.5 | 47 | 38.2 | 111 | 32.6 | |||
| Age of last child in months | <6* | 81 | 37.3 | 46 | 37.4 | 127 | 37.4 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| ≥6 | 136 | 62.7 | 77 | 62.6 | 213 | 62.6 | |||
| Total | 217 | 100.0 | 123 | 100.0 | 340 | 100.0 | |||
Notes: *1 Reference, ^Significant.
Unadjusted and Adjusted Relative Risk for Various Risk Factors for Mothers at End-Line (n = 315)
| Variable | Category | Anemia Endline (n=315) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemic | Non-Anemic | Unadjusted RR | P-value | Adjusted RR | P-value | ||||
| N | % | N | % | ||||||
| Age in years | ≤20* | 43 | 18.8 | 17 | 19.8 | 0.98(0.82 to 1.17) | 0.87 | …. | …. |
| > 20 | 186 | 81.2 | 69 | 80.2 | |||||
| Age at Marriage in years | <18* | 54 | 23.6 | 17 | 19.8 | 1.06(0.91 to 1.23) | 0.54 | …. | …. |
| ≥18 | 175 | 76.4 | 69 | 80.2 | |||||
| Age at menarche in years | <13* | 75 | 32.8 | 33 | 38.4 | 0.929 (0.80 to 1.07) | 0.35 | 0.69(0.41 to 1.19) | 0.185 |
| ≥13 | 154 | 67.2 | 52 | 60.5 | |||||
| Residence | Urban* | 110 | 48.0 | 48 | 55.8 | 0.91(0.8 to 1.05) | 0.25 | 0.72(0.43 to 1.22) | 0.224 |
| Rural | 119 | 52.0 | 38 | 44.2 | |||||
| Occupation | Homemaker* | 190 | 83.0 | 76 | 88.4 | 0.89(0.76 to 1.05) | 0.29 | 0.58(0.26 to 1.28) | 0.183 |
| Other | 39 | 17.0 | 10 | 11.6 | |||||
| Education | Not literate* | 98 | 42.8 | 34 | 39.5 | 1.03(0.91 to 1.18) | 0.61 | …. | …. |
| Literate | 131 | 57.2 | 52 | 60.5 | |||||
| Consanguious Marriage | Absent* | 139 | 60.7 | 52 | 60.5 | 0.95(0.83 to 1.09) | 0.52 | …. | …. |
| Present | 2 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.0 | |||||
| Type of the family | Extended* | 134 | 58.5 | 54 | 62.8 | 0.94(0.82 to 1.09) | 0.52 | …. | …. |
| Nuclear | 95 | 41.5 | 32 | 37.2 | |||||
| Socioeconomic Status | Lower or lower middle* | 101 | 44.1 | 42 | 48.8 | 1.35(1.08 to 1.71) | 0.002^ | 2.33(1.19 to 4.57) | 0.014^ |
| Others | 128 | 55.9 | 44 | 51.2 | |||||
| Type of house | Kutcha or semi pucca* | 194 | 84.7 | 59 | 68.6 | 1.01(0.88 to 1.15) | 1.00 | …. | …. |
| Pucca | 35 | 15.3 | 27 | 31.4 | |||||
| Overcrowding | Present* | 108 | 47.2 | 40 | 46.5 | 1.17(0.9 to 1.53) | 0.16 | 0.99(0.42 to 2.33) | 0.981 |
| Absent | 121 | 52.8 | 46 | 53.5 | |||||
| Gravida | ≥3* | 207 | 90.4 | 73 | 84.9 | 1.01(0.87 to 1.16) | 0.89 | …. | …. |
| <3 | 22 | 9.6 | 13 | 15.1 | |||||
| Parity | ≥3* | 82 | 35.8 | 30 | 34.9 | 0.94(0.81 to 1.10) | 0.55 | …. | …. |
| <3 | 147 | 64.2 | 56 | 65.1 | |||||
| Place of delivery | Home* | 173 | 75.5 | 68 | 79.1 | 0.98(0.7 to 1.37) | 1.00 | …. | …. |
| Hospital | 56 | 24.5 | 18 | 20.9 | |||||
| Previous any LSCS | Present* | 10 | 4.4 | 4 | 4.7 | 0.97(0.84 to 1.12) | 0.70 | …. | …. |
| Absent | 219 | 95.6 | 82 | 95.3 | |||||
| Male child | Absent* | 93 | 40.6 | 37 | 43.0 | 0.94(0.82 to 1.10) | 0.55 | …. | …. |
| Present | 136 | 59.4 | 49 | 57.0 | |||||
| Female child | Absent* | 89 | 38.9 | 35 | 40.7 | 0.94(0.82 to 1.11) | 0.49 | 0.96 (0.55 to 1.67) | 0.886 |
| Present | 140 | 61.1 | 51 | 59.3 | |||||
| Postnatal health facility visit | Absent* | 68 | 29.7 | 29 | 33.7 | 0.93(0.80 to 1.08) | 0.42 | 0.48(1.7 to 1.33) | 0.161 |
| Present | 161 | 70.3 | 57 | 66.3 | |||||
| IFA tablets consumed after last child birth | Absent* | 70 | 30.6 | 31 | 36.0 | 1.08(0.93 to 1.26) | 0.28 | 0.58 (0.18 to 1.88) | 0.368 |
| Present | 159 | 69.4 | 55 | 64.0 | |||||
| Age of last child in months | <6* | 161 | 70.3 | 55 | 64.0 | 0.89(0.77 to 1.04) | 0.07^ | 0.58(0.34 to 0.98) | 0.044^ |
| ≥6 | 68 | 29.7 | 31 | 36.0 | |||||
| Total | 229 | 100.0 | 86 | 100.0 | |||||
Notes: *1 Reference, ^Significant, Using Stepwise multivariate logistic regression.
The Themes and Codes Identified in the Weekly Local Recipe Talk in Mothers Kitchen
| Theme | Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Cooking practices | ||
| Do not buy ingredient | ||
| Rarely cooked | ||
| Family in acceptancy | ||
| Family restrictions | ||
| Available far away | ||
| Difficulty to find the ingredient | ||
| High cost | ||
| Low income | ||
| Lack of amenities | ||
| In adequate quantity | ||
| In appropriate cooking skills | ||
| Infrequent intake | ||
| Myth | ||
| Buy from shop | ||
| Not available | ||
| Not available always | ||
| Lack of time for cooking | ||
| Not possible with kids | ||
| Ready to eat food buy from shop | ||
| Someone else cook | ||
| Cooking in non-stick utensils | ||
| Do not eat leafy vegetables | ||
| Do not know how to cook | ||
| Do not know ingredient from family | ||
| Do not use drumstick leaves | ||
| Do not use ragi flour | ||
| Do not use the ingredient | ||
| Do not use whole green gram | ||
| Do not know how to cook iron rich food | ||
| Do not know the nutritional benefits | ||
| Food fads | ||
| Lack of knowledge of food ingredient | ||
| Lack of knowledge of nutritious food | ||
| Never tried cooking | ||
Figure 2The Treemap Beta illustrating quotation count with codes for weekly local recipe talk in mother’s kitchen.