| Literature DB >> 36091129 |
Yan Pan1, Shijie Shao2, Hang Sun2, Huafeng Zhu3, Haixing Fang2.
Abstract
Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is one of the most aggressive malignancies, lacking novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Exosome noncoding RNAs (ncRNA) were previously proposed as a potential source of biomarkers in several cancers. This study aimed to interpret the value of specific bile-derived ncRNA as predictors for early diagnosis and prognosis of CCA.Entities:
Keywords: bile; biomarker; cholangiocarcinoma; exosome; lncRNA; microRNA
Year: 2022 PMID: 36091129 PMCID: PMC9449313 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.985089
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Patient characteristics.
| Training set | Validation set | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCA (n = 30) | Control (n = 30) | CCA (n = 20) | Control (n = 20) | |
| Age (yr) | 61.7 ± 8.8 | 61.0 ± 9.6 | 58.6 ± 9.9 | 59.8 ± 10.3 |
| Male | 16 | 16 | 11 | 11 |
| Female | 14 | 14 | 9 | 9 |
| HBV | 7 | 9 | 4 | 6 |
| Overweight | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Diabetes | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Hypertension | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Acute cholangitis | 1 | 11 | 0 | 4 |
| CA19-9 positive | 19 | 5 | 13 | 2 |
| Maximal tumor size (cm) | 2.7 ± 2.2 | NA | 2.2 ± 1.9 | NA |
| Tumor stage | ||||
| I-II | 20 | NA | 12 | NA |
| III-IV | 10 | NA | 8 | NA |
| Differentiation | ||||
| High/moderate | 18 | NA | 13 | NA |
| Low | 12 | NA | 7 | NA |
| Vascular invasion | ||||
| Macro- | 2 | NA | 2 | NA |
| Micro- | 13 | NA | 8 | NA |
| Location | ||||
| Intrahepatic | 18 | NA | 11 | NA |
| Extrahepatic | 12 | NA | 9 | NA |
| Treatment | ||||
| Hepatectomy + chemo | 11 | NA | 7 | NA |
| Whipple + chemo | 13 | NA | 9 | NA |
| Chemo | 6 | NA | 4 | NA |
| Resection margin | ||||
| R0 | 18 | NA | 12 | NA |
| R1 | 6 | NA | 4 | NA |
Overweight: BMI>25; Acute cholangitis was defined as fever, abdominal pain, and jaundice;
Tumor stage was defined according to the TNM classification for CCA in the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging manual (8th edition);
CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CA19-9 positive: > 37 U/ml; chemo, chemotherapy;
CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; HBV, hepatitis B virus; NA, not available.
The PCR primers.
| ID | Primers |
|---|---|
| hsa-miR-200a-3p | F: 5’-GCCGGGTAACACTGTCTGGTA-3’ |
| hsa-miR-200b-3p | F: 5’-GCCGGGTAATACTGCCTGGTAA-3’ |
| hsa-miR-200c-3p | F: 5’-GCCGGGTAATACTGCCGGGTAAT-3’ |
| hsa-miR-141-3p | F: 5’-GCCGGGTAACACTGTCTGGTAA-3’ |
| hsa-miR-205-5p | F: 5’-GCCGGGTCCTTCATTCCACCGG-3’ |
| ENST00000588480.1 | GGCTTTCCGCAGTGAACTCGGGGGCACTATCCTCGGTACCCAGATGCCCACCTGTGTGCC |
| ENST00000517758.1 | TTTCAGGTAGTTGGGAGCCAGGGAAGGAGTGACACTATCCCTAGATGTAGTGATATGGTT |
Figure 1Exosomal ncRNAs in human bile and serum. (A) Heatmap showing the expression of exosomal ncRNAs in human bile and serum; (B) Significantly differential expressed exosomal ncRNAs between CCA group and control group; (C) The AUCs of exosomal ncRNAs in the diagnosis of CCA; (D) The correlation between serum and bile exosomal ncRNAs. **: vs. control group.
Comparison of AUCs in the diagnosis of CCA.
| Bile exosomal ncRNAs | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|
| miR-141-3p | 70.0 | 63.3 | 0.772* |
| miR-200a-3p | 70.0 | 83.3 | 0.757* |
| miR-200b-3p | 80.0 | 73.3 | 0.780* |
| miR-200c-3p | 83.3 | 86.7 | 0.869 |
| miR-205-5p | 63.3 | 63.3 | 0.676 |
| ENST00000588480.1 | 70.0 | 66.7 | 0.767* |
| ENST00000517758.1 | 66.7 | 60.0 | 0.690 |
|
| |||
| miR-141-3p | 73.3 | 63.3 | 0.716* |
| miR-200a-3p | 70.0 | 70.0 | 0.730* |
| miR-200b-3p | 56.7 | 50.0 | 0.552 |
| miR-200c-3p | 76.7 | 63.3 | 0.742* |
| miR-205-5p | 60.0 | 60.0 | 0.636 |
| ENST00000588480.1 | 73.3 | 50.0 | 0.643 |
| ENST00000517758.1 | 73.3 | 60.0 | 0.664 |
*: vs. Bile exosomal miR-200c-3p.
Potential biomarkers of CCA.
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OR (95%CI) |
| OR (95%CI) | |
| Serum CA19-9 > 37 U/ml | <.001 | 8.636 (2.566, 29.07) | ||
| Bile CEA > 25 ng/ml | 0.044 | 3.763 (1.038, 13.65) | ||
| Serum exosomal miR-141-3p | 0.011 | 4.030 (1.372, 11.84) | ||
| Serum exosomal miR-200a-3p | 0.003 | 5.444 (1.804, 16.43) | ||
| Serum exosomal miR-200c-3p | 0.003 | 5.675 (1.841, 17.49) | ||
| Bile exosomal miR-141-3p | 0.005 | 4.750 (1.584, 14.25) | ||
| Bile exosomal miR-200a-3p | <.001 | 11.67 (3.384, 40.22) | 0.027 | 5.581 (1.213, 25.68) |
| Bile exosomal miR-200b-3p | <.001 | 11.00 (3.292, 36.75) | ||
| Bile exosomal miR-200c-3p | <.001 | 32.50 (7.818, 135.1) | <.001 | 20.69 (4.631, 92.43) |
| Bile exosomal ENST00000588480.1 | 0.006 | 4.667 (1.571, 13.87) | ||
| Bile exosomal ENST00000517758.1 | 0.041 | 3.000 (1.046, 8.603) | ||
CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; OR, odds ratio, CI, confidential interval.
Influencing factors of patient survival.
| Tumor-free survival | Overall survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RR (95%CI) |
| RR (95%CI) | |
| Tumor differentiation | 0.036 | 4.689 (1.109, 1.787) | ||
| Tumor stage | 0.031 | 2.371 (1.085, 5.185) | 0.017 | 3.396 (1.247, 9.253) |
| Serum exosomal miR-200c-3p | 0.026 | 1.155 (1.018, 1.311) | 0.047 | 1.383 (1.005, 1.904) |
| Bile exosomal miR-200a-3p | 0.047 | 2.292 (1.010, 5.198) | ||
| Bile exosomal miR-200c-3p | 0.039 | 2.688 (1.052, 6.897) | ||
CCA, cholangiocarcinoma; RR, risk ratio, CI, confidential interval.
Figure 2Comparison of patient survival between patients with high and low levels of serum exosomal miR-200c-3p. (A) Tumor-free survival curves; (B) The overall survival curves.