| Literature DB >> 36090913 |
Anna Parola1,2, Jenny Marcionetti3, Luigia Simona Sica1, Lucia Donsì1.
Abstract
The 21st-century world of work complexity is considered a health risk factor for young people. Due to the economic crisis, globalization, and challenges of post-industrial society, 28.8% of Italian young people experience the NEET condition. The study aims to understand the psychological factors associated with the NEET status, specifically the self-perception of transition to adulthood, the future time perspective, and the effects on health in terms of internalizing and externalizing problems. To this end, 450 young people (150 students, 150 employees, 150 NEET) were involved. Moreover, the study has also highlighted that socio-demographic characteristics can play a role in the relationship between the NEET status and these outcomes. The results show that the NEET condition is associated with a negative vision about the future, a low self-perception of transition to adulthood, and internalizing and externalizing health problems. Starting from findings, implications regarding intervention models and future research directions are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Future time perspective; NEET; Structural equation models; Young people; internalizing/externalizing problems
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090913 PMCID: PMC9449955 DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03605-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Psychol ISSN: 1046-1310
Means and standard deviations for the students, employees, NEETs, and the total sample
| Students | Employees | NEET | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future Time Perspective | 30.33 (5.10) | 32.57 (4.36) | 28.53 (8.13) | 30.48 (6.29) |
| Transition to Adulthood | 4.90 (1.16) | 5.65 (0.98) | 4.61 (1.58) | 5.05 (1.33) |
| Anxious/Depressed | 13.13 (6.86) | 9.60 (6.53) | 18.41 (9.97) | 13.72 (8.71) |
| Withdrawn | 4.39 (3.25) | 3.37 (3.05) | 6.71 (5.35) | 4.83 (4.25) |
| Aggressive Behavior | 7.62 (5.36) | 5.97 (4.76) | 10.17 (7.43) | 7.92 (6.20) |
| Rules Breaking Behavior | 2.62 (3.13) | 2.52 (2.43) | 3.95 (3.18) | 3.18 (3.33) |
Cronbach’s alpha and correlations in the total sample (n = 450)
| alpha | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Future Time Perspective | 0.80 | - | |||||
| 2. Transition to Adulthood | - | − 0.56*** | - | ||||
| 3. Anxious/Depressed | 0.93 | − 0.54*** | − 0.50*** | - | |||
| 4. Withdrawn | 0.88 | − 0.60*** | − 0.50*** | 0.79*** | - | ||
| 5. Aggressive Behavior | 0.89 | − 0.51*** | − 0.49*** | 0.82*** | 0.73*** | - | |
| 6. Rules Breaking Behavior | 0.72 | − 0.33*** | − 0.25*** | 0.44*** | 0.46*** | 0.56*** | - |
***p < .001
Correlations for the students and the employees sub-samples
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Future Time Perspective | - | 0.29*** | − 0.16* | − 0.26** | − 0.14 | − 0.37*** |
| 2. Transition to Adulthood | 0.31*** | - | − 0.15 | 0.04 | − 0.17* | − 0.20* |
| 3. Anxious/Depressed | − 0.14 | − 0.20* | - | 0.59** | 0.69*** | 0.29*** |
| 4. Withdrawn | − 0.32*** | − 0.34*** | 0.54*** | - | 0.42** | 0.33*** |
| 5. Aggressive Behavior | − 0.21* | − 0.29*** | 0.68*** | 0.55*** | - | 0.52*** |
| 6. Rules Breaking Behavior | − 0.33*** | − 0.29*** | 0.36*** | 0.37*** | 0.54*** | - |
* p < .05, ** p < .01, ***p < .001
Means and standard deviations for Non-NEET and NEET groups and for the global sample
| Non-NEET | NEET | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Future Time Perspective | 31.45 (4.86) | 28.53 (8.13) | 30.48 (6.29) |
| Transition to Adulthood | 5.27 (1.14) | 4.61 (1.58) | 5.05 (1.33) |
| Anxious/Depressed | 11.37 (6.92) | 18.41 (9.97) | 13.72 (8.71) |
| Withdrawn | 3.88 (3.19) | 6.71 (5.35) | 4.83 (4.25) |
| Aggressive Behavior | 6.80 (5.13) | 10.17 (7.43) | 7.92 (6.20) |
| Rules Breaking Behavior | 2.57 (2.80) | 3.95 (3.18) | 3.18 (3.33) |
Fig. 1Path model tested on the global sample (n = 450). (Note. FTP = Future Time Perspective; TA = Transition to Adulthood; AD = Anxious/Depressed; Wi = Withdrawn; AB = Aggressive Behavior; RB = Rules Breaking. The NEET variable has been coded as 0 = Non-NEET and 1 = NEET. Standardized coefficients are showed in the figure. * p < .05, ** p < .01, ***p < .001)
Fig. 2Path model tested on the NEET sub-sample (n = 150). (Note. FTP = Future Time Perspective; TA = Transition to Adulthood; AD = Anxious/Depressed; Wi = Withdrawn; AB = Aggressive Behavior; RB = Rules Breaking. The variables have been coded as follow: Age (0 = 25–29; 1 = 30–34); sex (0 = male; 1 = female); Looking for the First Job (0 = yes; 1 = no); Time of Unemployment (0 = short-term NEET; 1 = long-term NEET). Standardized coefficients are showed in the figure. In order to improve figure readability, only significant paths are showed. * p < .05, ** p < .01, ***p < .001)