| Literature DB >> 36090875 |
Xiaofang Hu1, Jun Tian1, Jinhua Xie1, Shaorui Zheng1, Liangfeng Wei1, Lin Zhao1, Shousen Wang1.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) with brain herniation predisposes to posttraumatic cerebral infarction (PTCI), which in turn seriously affects the prognosis of patients. At present, there is a lack of effective indicators that can accurately predict the occurrence of PTCI. We aimed to find possible risk factors for the development of PTCI by comparing the preoperative and postoperative clinical data of TBI patients with brain herniation.Entities:
Keywords: brain herniation; post-traumatic cerebral infarction (PTCI); risk factors; shock index (SI); traumatic brain injury
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090875 PMCID: PMC9454297 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.956039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Figure 1CT imaging of patients with secondary cerebral infarction after TBI cerebral hernia. (A) Left frontotemporoparietal hematoma after TBI. (B) Hematoma evacuation and decompressive craniectomy showing a left occipital low-density infarction area. (C) Right frontotemporal hematoma with SAH. (D) Decompressive craniectomy showing cerebral hemispheric infarction. (E) Left frontotemporoparietal epidural hematoma with arachnoid hemorrhage. (F) Hematoma evacuation and decompressive craniectomy showed extensive infarction of the right cerebral hemisphere. (G) Frontal lobe laceration, right frontotemporal hematoma, and arachnoid hemorrhage. (H) Postoperative frontal lobe infarction.
The relationship between cerebral infarction and death.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| None | 43 | 23 | <0.001 | 4.069 (1.892~8.750) |
| Yes | 17 | 37 |
From the above, it can be seen that there was a significant difference in the risk of death between the infarction group and the control group. The risk of death was 4.069 times higher in the infarction group.
Univariate analysis of PTCI-related variables in 120 patients with TBI and herniation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 51 (53.12) | 45 (46.88) | 0.411 | 0.680 (0.271~1.704) |
| Female | 15 (62.50) | 9 (37.50) | |||
| Age | 53.42 ± 19.76 | 58.54 ± 12.23 | 0.103 | 1.019 (0.996~1.042) | |
| SAH | None | 34 (70.83) | 14 (29.17) |
| 3.036 (1.396~6.601) |
| Yes | 32 (44.44) | 40 (55.56) | |||
| Aspiration pneumonia | None | 54 (75.00) | 18 (25.00) |
| 9.000 (3.872~20.919) |
| Yes | 12 (25.00) | 36 (75.00) | |||
| DC | None | 23 (36.51) | 40 (63.49) | ||
| Yes | 43 (75.44) | 14 (24.56) |
| 5.342 (2.420~11.790) | |
| MAP | 95.08 ± 19.19 | 86.99 ± 15.70 |
| 0.974 (0.957~0.995) | |
| GCS | 6.09 ± 3.64 | 4.32 ± 1.41 |
| 0.765 (0.640~0.914) | |
| GLU | 11.74 ± 5.19 | 14.74 ± 7.15 |
| 1.083 (1.018~1.152) | |
| SI | 0.72 ± 0.28 | 1.00 ± 0.29 |
| 27.539 (6.141~123.496) | |
| ICP monitoring | None | 38 (46.34%) | 44 (53.66%) |
| 0.308 (0.133~0.716) |
| Yes | 28 (73.68%) | 10 (26.32%) | |||
| D-Dimer | 22.64 ± 13.82 | 25.63 ± 13.65 | 0.235 | 1.016 (0.990~1.044) | |
| PT | 20.67 ± 30.17 | 16.23 ± 9.51 | 0.337 | 0.990 (0.969~1.011) | |
| INR | 3.31 ± 15.35 | 1.45 ± 0.90 | 0.585 | 0.970 (0.869~1.082) | |
| APTT | 34.00 ± 15.64 | 33.46 ± 14.10 | 0.840 | 0.997 (0.973~1.022) | |
| TT | 24.12 ± 15.79 | 22.78 ± 10.04 | 0.590 | 0.992 (0.965~1.021) | |
| Temperature | 37.54 ± 1.07 | 37.26 ± 4.94 | 0.669 | 0.976 (0.874~1.090) |
SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; DC, decompressive craniectomy; MAP, mean arterial pressure; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; GLU, blood glucose; SI, shock index; ICP, intracranial pressure; PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; TT, thrombin time.
The bold values represent p < 0.05 which is statistically significant.
Multivariate analysis of the risk of PTCI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAH | 1.155 | 4.091 | 0.043 | 3.172 | 1.036~9.711 |
| Aspiration pneumonia | 2.154 | 15.085 | 0.000 | 8.617 | 2.906~25.548 |
| DC | 1.833 | 10.636 | 0.001 | 6.255 | 2.078~18.826 |
| SI | 2.466 | 5.460 | 0.019 | 11.770 | 1.488~93.094 |
| ICP monitoring | −1.250 | 4.172 | 0.041 | 0.287 | 0.086~0.951 |
SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; DC, decompressive craniectomy; SI, shock index; ICP, intracranial pressure.
Figure 2Classification and Regression Tree of the risk of cerebral hernia patients with PTCI. Standardized importance analysis showed that SI was the primary influencing factor for PTCI. Taking SI as the independent variable and cerebral infarction as the dependent variable, the predictive value of cerebral infarction in patients with traumatic brain hernia showed that the optimal SI cut-off point was 0.802.
Importance of independent variables.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| SI | 0.144 | 100.0% |
| Aspiration pneumonia | 0.120 | 83.2% |
| DC | 0.076 | 52.4% |
| Subarachnoid hemorrhage | 0.033 | 23.2% |
| ICP monitoring | 0.032 | 22.4% |
Compared with SI, the standardized importance of aspiration pneumonia, DC, SAH, and ICP monitoring were 83.2, 52.4, 23.2, and 22.4%, respectively. Standardized importance analysis showed that SI was the primary predictor of PTCI.
Figure 3ROC curve of SI for predicting PTCI in patients with TBI brain herniation. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the area under the curve was 0.775 (95% CI = 0.689–0.861, P < 0.001).
Figure 4Corresponding score for the nomogram model. A nomogram model for predicting the risk of complicated cerebral infarction in patients with brain herniation was established by R software. The combined SAH score was 21.5 points, the combined aspiration pneumonia score was 46.5 points, and the decompression without craniectomy score was 41.5 points, and without ICP monitoring score was 21.5 points. For every 0.2 increase in the SI value, the nomographic score increased by 11.1 points.
A nomogram model score for predicting the risk of PTCI in patients with brain herniation.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| SAH | 21.5 |
| Aspiration pneumonia | 46.5 |
| DC | 41.5 |
| SI | 11.1/0.2 |
| ICP monitoring | 21.5 |
SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; DC, decompressive craniectomy; SI, shock index; ICP, intracranial pressure.
The line score plot increased by 11.1 points for each 0.2 increase in SI values and by 21.5 points for no ICP monitoring.
Figure 5Decision curve analysis. Survival rates (net benefit rates) were compared for three different decisions. The three curves represent: (1) all patients have no factors that influence the risk of developing PTCI (represented by NONE, horizontal line), (2) all patients are at risk of developing PTCI (represented by ALL, slash), and (3) he decision curve of this study. This prediction model can be used for clinical decision-making. Thresholds are in the range of <85%, and the model has a higher survival rate (net benefit rate) relative to ALL or NONE.