| Literature DB >> 36090468 |
Rhowell Jr N Tiozon1,2, Kristel June D Sartagoda1, Luster May N Serrano1, Alisdair R Fernie2, Nese Sreenivasulu1.
Abstract
Background: Whole grain cereals are a good source of nutrients. Several cutting-edge metabolomic platforms have been deployed to identify various phenolic compounds and enhance cereal bioactive bioavailability. A diet rich in cereal phenolics may modify the microbial composition, support gut homeostasis, and increase gut health, thereby lowering the risk of non-communicable illness. Scope and approach: In this work, we reviewed current metabolomic breakthroughs in cereal phenolic profiling and their effects on human health via gut microbiota modulation. We argue that the information presented in this paper will assist in the development of nutritionally superior cereal breeds and functional foods. Key findings and conclusion: Most cereal grains contain ferulic acid derivatives, caffeoyl glycerides, and feruloyl and coumaroyl esters. While there has been significant progress in discovering novel phenolic compounds in cereals, quantifying these molecules, and translating their therapeutic effects from animal model systems to humans remains a challenge. To this end, metabolomics, and other high-throughput-omics-based platforms must be integrated to further examine the structure and functionality of phenolic metabolites to breed nutritionally rich cereals as well as map their influence on human health benefits. Rare alleles must be introduced to improve bioactive content in cereal grains while maintaining yield. Following that, these exceptional varieties must be effectively processed to maximize phenolic bioavailability.Entities:
Keywords: Cereals; Gut microbiota; Metabolomics; Phenolics
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090468 PMCID: PMC9449372 DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.06.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0924-2244 Impact factor: 16.002
Common flavonoids in whole-grain cereals measured using HPLC (mg/100 g DM).
| Barley | Corn | Oats | Rice | Rye | Sorghum | Wheat | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyanidin | 0.86–23.93(n = 7) | 0.6–260.1 (n = 6) | npr | 0–302.22 (n = 8) | 0.29 (n = 1) | dominantly 3-deoxyanthocyanidins | 0–7.1 (n = 13) |
| Maldivin | 0.06–3.86 (n = 7) | nd | 0–81.2 (n = 9) | nd | 5.2–9.04 (n = 2) | ||
| Delphinidin | 2.2–16.7(n = 7) | + | + | 0.03–0.29 (n = 1) | 0–4.5 (n = 13) | ||
| Peonidin | 0.33–3.75(n = 7) | 5.2–26.2 (n = 6) | 0–11.87 (n = 8) | 0–5.3 (n = 11) | 0.27–0.6 (n = 2) | ||
| Pelargodinin | 1.21–4.22(n = 7) | 1.1–41.1 (n = 6) | + | nd | 0–0.4 (n = 13) | ||
| Catechin | 1.31–2.38 (n = 7) | 7.36 (n = 1) | 0.56 ± 0.05 (n = 1) | 0–1.39 (n = 11) | + | 0–10 (n = 3) | 0.83–1.79 (n = 75) |
| Epicatechin | 0.18–0.50 (n = 4) | + | + | 0.34–1.41 (n = 3) | + | 0–2 (n = 3) | + |
| Eriodictyol | + | nd | npr | + | npr | 0–1.29 (n = 13) | npr |
| Hesperidin | 0.18–0.56 (n = 4) | nd | npr | + | npr | + | 3 × 10−5 – 0.02 (n = 100) |
| Naringin | 0.0–0.1 (n = 7) | + | + | + | npr | npr | 7 × 10−5 – 0.01 (n = 100) |
| Naringenin | 0.0005–0.02 (n = 4) | 14.8 (n = 1) | + | 0–0.35 (n = 3) | + | 0–4.84 (n = 13) | 2.39–4.62 (n = 75) |
| Apigenin | + | + | npr | 1.44–2.85 (n = 8) | 0–1.52 (n = 12) | 0–20.37 (n = 13) | 20.0–36.5 (n = 21) |
| Isovitexin | 0.190–0.89 (n = 4) | npr | + | 0–1320 (n = 1) | npr | + | + |
| Luteolin | + | + | + | 0.5–1.0 (n = 1) | + | 0–18.2 (n = 13) | 3.10–4.14 (n = 75) |
| Vitexin | 21.82–93.57 (n = 4) | npr | + | 1863–1965 | npr | + | 0.89–2.66 (n = 75) |
| Quercetin | 0.0004–18.41 (n = 4) | 0.09–1.58 (n = 2) | 10.18 ± 0.06 (n = 1) | 0–1.87 (n = 11) | + | 0–0.67 (n = 10) | 1.96–10.48 (n = 75) |
| Myricetin | 2.77–4.26 (n = 7) | + | + | 0–0.4 (n = 3) | + | + | + |
| Rutin | 0.02–1.12 (n = 4) | 2.74–14.15 (n = 2) | 0.32 ± 0.08 (n = 1) | 0.24–0.38 (n = 3) | + | + | 0.63–1.45 (n = 75) |
| Kaempferol | 1.12–2.39 (n = 7) | 0.124–224 (n = 2) | 0.97 ± 0.2 (n = 1) | 0–0.38 (n = 3) | + | 0–0.48 (n = 10) | 1.04–2.27 (n = 75) |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |||
+ = present but not quantified, nd = not detected, npr – no publish results.
Fig. 1Metabolomic approach for targeted breeding and its effect in the gut microbiome.
LC – Liquid Chromatography, GC – Gas Chromatography, NMR – Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.
Fig. 2Cereal phenolic compounds quantified in targeted metabolomics.
Fig. 3Unravelling the metabolism of cereal-derived phenolic compounds in the human body and its implication to nutrition.
Gut microbiota-modulating effects of cereal-derived phenolic compounds.
| Biological Source | Phenolic compound/s of interest | Effects on microbiota | Method used for the study | Quantification of Phenolic Compounds | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barley | Protocatechuic acid, gallic acid, cinnamic acid, catechin, and dihydroxybenzoic acid | ↓ | RP-HPLC-DAD | ||
| Corn | Anthocyanins, p-coumaric, ferulic, and caffeic acid | UPLC-DAD | ( | ||
| Millet | 3-hydroxybenzylhydrazine, luteolin-3′,7-diglucoside, N-acetyltyramine, p-coumaric acid, vanillin, sinapic acid, ferulic acid and isophoro | LC-MS | |||
| Oat | Avenanthramide, hydroxycinnamic acids and benzoic acid derivatives | ↑ | HPLC-DAD | ||
| Rice | Indole-2-carboxylic acid, Hydrocinnamic acid, Benzoic acid, Phenylacetic acid | ↑ | GC-MS | ||
| Rice | Lignans, Isoflavonoids, Phenolic alcohols, Isoflavones, Flavan-3-ols | ↑ | UHPLC-ESI/QTOF-MS | ||
| Rice | Pyrocatechol, 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propionic acid, salicylic acid, | ↑ | LC-MS | ||
| Sorghum | 3-deoxyanthocyanins | ↑ | HPLC-DAD | ||
| Wheat | Dihydroferulic acid and ferulic acid | ↓ | HPLC-MS/MS |
Abbreviations: Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH); GC-MS (Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry); LAB (Lactic Acid Bacteria); LC-MS (Liquid Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry); RP-HPLC-DAD (Reversed-Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic); UHPLC-ESI/QTOF-MS (Ultra-High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography Coupled to a Hybrid Quadrupole-Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometer); UHPLC-MSn (Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography – Mass Spectrometry).