| Literature DB >> 36090452 |
Shengtao Ren1, Xiangling Hou1, Juzhe Xi1.
Abstract
In order to solve the problems of high misevaluation rate and low work efficiency in the process of mental health intelligent evaluation, a method of mental health intelligent evaluation system oriented to the decision tree algorithm is proposed. First, the current research status of mental health intelligent evaluation was analyzed and the framework of mental health intelligent evaluation system was constructed. Then, the mental health intelligent evaluation data were collected and the decision tree algorithm was used to analyze and classify the mental health intelligent evaluation data to obtain the mental health intelligent evaluation results. Finally, specific simulation experiments are used to analyze the feasibility and superiority of the mental health intelligent evaluation system. The experimental results show that the recall rate of each system increases with the increasing number of iterations, and the system has the highest recall rate. Also, it is stable after the number of iterations reaches 20, with good recall and adaptive scheduling performance. The recall rate of comparison system 1 and comparison system 2 fluctuates greatly, and the recall rate is lower than that of the system in this paper. It is proved that the method of the mental health intelligent evaluation system of the decision tree algorithm can effectively solve the problem and improve the accuracy of the mental health intelligent evaluation. The efficiency of mental health intelligent evaluation is improved, and the system stability is better, which can meet the actual requirements of current mental health intelligent evaluation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090452 PMCID: PMC9463036 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9270502
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 3.822
Figure 1General structure drawing.
Figure 2Psychological assessment data mining flowchart.
Figure 3Comparison results.
Figure 4Data processing time of the three systems.
Mental health assessment accuracy of the three systems.
| Noise (dB) | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| System | 93.46 | 92.10 | 92.74 | 91.06 |
| Comparison system 1 | 88.06 | 87.74 | 87.73 | 85.98 |
| Comparison system 2 | 81.78 | 81.69 | 81.02 | 80.37 |
Figure 5Comparison of recall rates of three systems.