| Literature DB >> 36090147 |
Hongyan Yao1, Yanan Zhang1, Zhen Wang2,3, Gaoming Liu4, Quan Ran4,5, Zhengwang Zhang2, Keji Guo6, Ailin Yang7, Nan Wang1, Pengcheng Wang2,4.
Abstract
Deciphering the role of climatic oscillations in species divergence helps us understand the mechanisms that shape global biodiversity. The cold-adapted species may have expanded their distribution with the development of glaciers during glacial period. With the retreat of glaciers, these species were discontinuously distributed in the high-altitude mountains and isolated by geographical barriers. However, the study that focuses on the speciation process of cold-adapted species is scant. To fill this gap, we combined population genetic data and ecological niche models (ENMs) to explore divergence process of snow partridge (Lerwa lerwa). Lerwa lerwa is a cold-adapted bird that is distributed from 4,000 to 5,500 m. We found 2 genetic populations within L. lerwa, and they diverged from each other at about 0.40-0.44 million years ago (inter-glacial period after Zhongliangan glaciation). The ENMs suggested that L. lerwa expanded to the low elevations of the Himalayas and Hengduan mountains during glacial period, whereas it contracted to the high elevations, southern of Himalayas, and Hengduan mountains during inter-glacial periods. Effective population size trajectory also suggested that L. lerwa expanded its population size during the glacial period. Consistent with our expectation, the results support that inter-glacial isolation contributed to the divergence of cold-adapted L. lerwa on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. This study deepens our understanding of how climatic oscillations have driven divergence process of cold-adapted Phasianidae species distributed on mountains.Entities:
Keywords: Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau; Quaternary; climate fluctuations; divergence; snow partridge
Year: 2021 PMID: 36090147 PMCID: PMC9450178 DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoab075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Zool ISSN: 1674-5507 Impact factor: 2.734
Figure 1The location of the samples and the distribution of L. lerwa (blue, red, and purple circles indicate the sampling locations of L. l. callipygia, L. l. major, and L. l. lerwa, respectively. The corresponding shadow indicates the distribution of each sub-species, referring to the IUCN red list, field research experience of Nan Wang, and Zheng G-M. 2015. The stars mark the sampling locations of the 2 outgroups. The source of the map was from https://www.resdc.cn/).
Figure 2The genetic populations revealed by Structure and DAPCs. (A) There were 2 genetic populations within L. lerwa; (B) The composition of the 2 genetic clusters revealed by DAPC; (C) The genetic compositions of the different genetic populations when K = 2 and 3 (the Deltak value suggested, K = 2, is the best cluster value).
Figure 3Divergence time within L. lerwa. (A) Divergence time estimated by the *BEAST; (B) Posterior probability of the divergence time estimated by the isolation with migration model (L. l. major includes L. l. callipygia. The gray bar means the 95% HPD of the divergence time.).
The parameters of demographic history estimated by isolation with migration model
| Parameters | t0 (mya) | q0 (×106) | q1 (× 106) | q2 (×106) | m (0 > 1) | m (1 > 0) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HiPt | 0.44 | 0.90 | 0.84 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| 95%Lo | 0.30 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.06 |
| 95%Hi | 0.80 | 1.23 | 1.11 | 2.54 | 0.32 | 0.60 |
| MPP | 3.61 | 2.92 | 3.44 | 1.10 | 7.89 | 2.99 |
(t0: divergence time between L. l. lerwa and L. l. major; q0: effective population size of L. l. lerwa; q1: effective population size of L. l. major; q2: effective population size of the ancestor population of both L. l. lerwa and L. l. major; m (0 > 1): the migration rate from L. l. major to L. l. lerwa; m (1 > 0): the migration rate from L. l. lerwa to L. l. major; hipt: the value of the bin with the highest count; 95%Lo, the estimated point to which 2.5% of the total area lies to the left; 95%hi, the estimated point to which 2.5% of the total areas lies to the right.
The gene flow was significantly larger than the null expectation that the migrate rate was zero. Lerwa lerwa major includes the previous classified L. l. callipygia). MPP, marginal posterior probability.
Figure 4The historical trajectories of the effective population size of L. lerwa and the climate (g, generation time; u, mutation rate. The red and blue lines represent the constructed and bootstrapped curves, respectively. The black line represents the historical climate condition. The data of the climate is from Song et al. (2007). The yellow and blue bars identify the inter-glacial and glacial period, respectively. Because the parameters estimated by PSMC have small variance between 2 × 104 years ago and 3 × 106 years ago, we only show the trajectory before 104 years ago following Li and Durbin (2011).
Figure 5Suitable distributions of L. lerwa during the 4 periods. (A) Suitable current distribution, represented in violet; (B) Suitable distribution during Middle Holocene, represented in cyan; (C) Suitable distribution during the LGM, represented in blue; (D) Suitable distribution during the LIG period, represented in pink (the area surrounded by the dotted line is the study area. The arrows indicate the suitable distribution in LIG. The number under each figure indicates the size of the suitable distribution. The source of the map was from https://www.resdc.cn/).