| Literature DB >> 36090036 |
Ting Zhang1, Shasha Zhu1, Haixia Miao1, Jianbin Yang1, Yezhen Shi2, Yuwei Yue2, Yu Zhang2, Rulai Yang1, Benqing Wu3, Xinwen Huang1.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal intrahepatic cholestasis caused by citrin deficiency (NICCD) is a pan-ethnic complicated inborn error of metabolism but the specific mechanism is not fully understood.Entities:
Keywords: NICCD; clinical diagnosed group; metabolic characteristics; newborn-screen group; prognosis; progression
Year: 2022 PMID: 36090036 PMCID: PMC9449879 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.939837
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Mol Biosci ISSN: 2296-889X
Biochemical indices of the “Newborn-screen Group” and “Clinical diagnosed Group” at first detection.
| Indices | Newborn-screen group (average ± SD, positive rate) | Reference intervals for 10–30 days | Clinical diagnosed group (average ± SD, positive rate) | Reference intervals for 1–12 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP (g/L)↓a | 44.02 ± 6.87 (62.2%) | 41.0–63.0 | 46.13 ± 8.26 (91%) | 57.0–80.0 |
| ALB (g/L)↓ | 30.29 ± 5.55 (54.1%) | 28.0–44.0 | 31.8 ± 5.65 (58.56%) | 32.0–52.0 |
| GLB (g/L)↓ | 13.72 ± 2.55 (100.00%) | 20.0–40.0 | 14.34 ± 3.94 (90.99%) | 20.0–40.0 |
| TBil (umol/L)↑b | 122.33 ± 69.30 (91.9%) | 5.0–21.0 | 139.88 ± 66.05 (94.59%) | 5.0–21.0 |
| DBil** (umol/L)↑ | 41.79 ± 29.83 (91. 9%) | 0–5.1 | 66.08 ± 38.28 (95.5%) | 0–5.1 |
| IBil (umol/L)↑ | 80.54 ± 51.19 (86.49%) | 1.0–20.0 | 73.87 ± 44.91 (90.09%) | 1.0–20.0 |
| ALT** (U/L)↑ | 27.05 ± 13.84 (10.8%) | 5–50 | 44.83 ± 25.73 (34.23%) | 5–50 |
| AST** (U/L)↑ | 69.73 ± 40.95 (35.1%) | 25–75 | 121.93 ± 63.71 (90.99%) | 15–60 |
| CHE (U/L)↓ | 5124 ± 1589 (70.3%) | 5300–11300 | 4689.98 ± 1373.16 (78.38%) | 5300–11300 |
| GGT (U/L)↑ | 189.81 ± 90.19 (94.59%) | 8–57 | 188.72 ± 99.97 (94.59%) | 8–57 |
| ALP (U/L)↑ | 845.48 ± 438.66 (86.49%) | 42–362 | 952.53 ± 512.09 (90.09%) | 42–362 |
| ADA** (U/L)↑ | 13.27 ± 5.93 (37.84%) | 0–15 | 22.22 ± 12.07 (66.67%) | 0–15 |
| TBA** (umol/L)↑ | 190.58 ± 87.89 (83.78%) | 0–12 | 253 ± 101.73 (95.88%) | 0–12 |
| urea** (mmol/L)↓ | 3.73 ± 1.37 (4%) | 1.79–6.43 | 2.82 ± 1.08 (12.12%) | 1.79–6.43 |
| Uric Acid* (mmol/L)↓ | 207.6 ± 73.6 (16%) | 155–357 | 164.65 ± 63.59 (23.47%) | 155–357 |
| LDH** (U/L)↑ | 250.25 ± 147.75 (4.00%) | 180–430 | 473.94 ± 250.57 (65.98%) | 180–430 |
| TG (mmol/L)↑ | 1.69 ± 1.23 (44.00%) | <1.7 | 1.65 ± 0.74 (41.24%) | <1.7 |
| TCH* (mmol/L)↑ | 3.88 ± 1.30 (4.00%) | 3–5.7 | 4.52 ± 1.33 (24.74%) | 3–5.7 |
| amylase** (U/L)↓ | 19.14 ± 17.92 (56%) | 28–100 | 13.2 ± 12.0 (52.58%) | 28–100 |
| Lactate** (mmol/L)↑ | 2.22 ± 1.20 (68.18%) | 0.5–1.6 | 4.2 ± 1.95 (93.68%) | 0.5–1.6 |
| AFP (ng/mL)↑ | 113734 ± 127414 (84.38%) | 0–20 | 201751 ± 465135 (92%) | 25–100 (1–3M); 25–100 (>3M) |
| HB** (g/L)↓ | 115 ± 17 (31.82%) | 170–200 | 96.93 ± 12.97 (80.85%) | 110–155 |
| Ammonia** (umol/L)↑ | 48.26 ± 34.33 (73.68%) | 9–30 | 85.94 ± 35.03 (95.92%) | 9–30 |
| PT (s)↑ | 14.67 ± 2.64 (38.46%) | 9–14 | 15.94 ± 4.02 (62.5%) | 9–14 |
| TT*(s)↑ | 21.65 ± 2.05 (30.00%) | 15–22 | 24.95 ± 3.96 (66.67%) | 15–22 |
| APTT (s)↑ | 48.33 ± 18.67 (92.31%) | 23–38 | 52.55 ± 15.05 (36.78%) | 23–38 |
**means the difference in the two groups is significant at the 0.01 level.
*means the difference in the two groups is significant at the 0.05 level.
↓ameans the positive rate is calculated for the values lower than the normal range.
↑bmeans the positive rate is calculated for the values higher than the normal range.
TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; GLB, globulin; TBil, total bilirubin; DBil, direct bilirubin; IBil, indirect bilirubin; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate amino transferase; CHE, cholinesterase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ADA, adenosine deaminase; TBA, total bile acid; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; TG, triglyceride; TCH, total cholesterol; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; HB, hemoglobin; PT, prothrombin time; TT, thrombin time; APTT, activate partial thrombin activity time.
FIGURE 1Comparison of MS/MS results in the “Newborn-screen Group” and “Clinical diagnosed Group” at first detection. The “Newborn-screen Group,” the “Clinical diagnosed Group,” “Normal neonates aged 3–7 days,” and “Normal children aged 1–12 months” were distinguished by light blue, dark blue, light red, and dark red boxes, respectively. The horizontal lines on the top, bottom, and inside of the box represent the 75% quantile (Q3), 25% quantile (Q1), and median, respectively. The points distributed outside the upper and lower edges represent the outliers of each indicator.
FIGURE 2OPSL-DA results of metabolic parameters in the “Newborn-screen Group” and “Clinical diagnosed Group.” (A) Score plot of OPSL-DA. The x-axis represents the forecasting principal component and the y-axial represents the orthogonal principal component. Each point in the figure represents a sample. Red is for the “Clinical diagnosed Group” and green is for the “Newborn-screen Group.” (B) Inertia column diagram shows R2X, R2Y, and Q2 to evaluate whether the orthogonal components are sufficient. Q2 > 0.5 is considered to be reliable. (C) VIP scores of the different indicators are screened. Generally, the VIP value greater than 1 is screened as an important indicator (the 16 indicators are sorted in descending order). (D) Model validation diagram. The x-axis represents values of R2X, R2Y, and Q2, while the y-axial represents frequency of the model classification effect. The p-value is less than 0.01 which indicates the model is relatively good.
FIGURE 3Dynamic change analysis of typical indicators in the “Newborn-screen Group” and “Clinical diagnosed Group” during ages 1–12 months. The “Clinical diagnosed Group” and the “Newborn-screen Group” were distinguished by red and green boxes, respectively. The horizontal lines on the top, bottom, and inside of the box represent the 75% quantile (Q3), 25% quantile (Q1), and median, respectively. The points distributed outside the upper and lower edges represent the outliers of each indicator.
FIGURE 4Ages of patients in the “Newborn-screen Group” and “Clinical diagnosed Group” when each indicator starts to return to normal. The ages of recovery of each indicator were described as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and arranged from smallest to largest.
FIGURE 5Frequency and proportion of SLC25A13 mutations in Chinese populations in our population.
FIGURE 6Metabolic pathways involved in NICCD patients.