Purpose: The fasciocutaneous (FC) flap or the axial flap consists of skin, subcutaneous tissue, and deep fascia. In the literature today, there is no evidence suggesting that either surgery is superior to the other in terms of outcome and complications. Reviews in the literature currently compare the outcomes of skin closure after Orthopedic surgeries. The meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes, complication rates, need for re-surgery, and donor site morbidity between the AF flaps and FC flaps. A null hypothesis that stated inferior outcomes of FC flaps along with more complication rates over AF flaps was kept at the start of the study. Methods: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase were searched until December 2020. The review included all original studies which compared the outcomes or complications between FC and AF flaps. The quality of studies was assessed using the Minors score. Results: A total of 7 original studies with AF and FC flap procedures of which 136 underwent FC flap and 212 underwent AF flap. The pooled data meta-analysis and the subgroup analysis of these studies found no standardized protocol for reporting the outcomes or the cosmetic outcome of the flap surgery. The adipofascial group showed overall shorter operative time, less bulky flap and ability to wear footwear. Also the complications did not differ in both groups with respect to flap loss, complication following surgery, wound dehiscence, wound closure, donor site complications. Conclusion: The current meta-analysis reveals that there is no added benefit of using AF flaps over the FC flaps. The rates of partial or total flap necrosis along with donor site morbidities and successful wound closure and overall complication rates were similar between the two groups. However, there is evidence to support the superiority of AF flaps over the FC variety with respect to ease of wearing footwear and a less bulky flap. Level of evidence: Level 1 Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: The fasciocutaneous (FC) flap or the axial flap consists of skin, subcutaneous tissue, and deep fascia. In the literature today, there is no evidence suggesting that either surgery is superior to the other in terms of outcome and complications. Reviews in the literature currently compare the outcomes of skin closure after Orthopedic surgeries. The meta-analysis aims to compare the clinical outcomes, complication rates, need for re-surgery, and donor site morbidity between the AF flaps and FC flaps. A null hypothesis that stated inferior outcomes of FC flaps along with more complication rates over AF flaps was kept at the start of the study. Methods: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase were searched until December 2020. The review included all original studies which compared the outcomes or complications between FC and AF flaps. The quality of studies was assessed using the Minors score. Results: A total of 7 original studies with AF and FC flap procedures of which 136 underwent FC flap and 212 underwent AF flap. The pooled data meta-analysis and the subgroup analysis of these studies found no standardized protocol for reporting the outcomes or the cosmetic outcome of the flap surgery. The adipofascial group showed overall shorter operative time, less bulky flap and ability to wear footwear. Also the complications did not differ in both groups with respect to flap loss, complication following surgery, wound dehiscence, wound closure, donor site complications. Conclusion: The current meta-analysis reveals that there is no added benefit of using AF flaps over the FC flaps. The rates of partial or total flap necrosis along with donor site morbidities and successful wound closure and overall complication rates were similar between the two groups. However, there is evidence to support the superiority of AF flaps over the FC variety with respect to ease of wearing footwear and a less bulky flap. Level of evidence: Level 1 Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: Karsten Schmidt; Michael Jakubietz; Stefanie Djalek; Patrick Stefan Harenberg; Philip Helge Zeplin; Rafael Jakubietz Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Moon Sang Chung; Goo Hyun Baek; Hyun Sik Gong; Seung Hwan Rhee; Won Seok Oh; Min Bum Kim; Kyung Hag Lee; Tae Woo Kim; Young Ho Lee Journal: Clin Orthop Surg Date: 2009-02-06