| Literature DB >> 36089961 |
Su Yang1,2,3, Tianyue Tang1, Hongyang Li4, Long Zhu2, Jiawei Huang1.
Abstract
With in-depth development of industrialization and urbanization in China, improving the professional skills and quality of migrant workers in the construction industry has become an important measure to optimize the labor force structure and promote the industry upgrading. Numerous studies have been carried out on this topic, and construction industrial workers with high skills level and professional quality have replaced the professional identity of migrant workers. However, the psychological cognitive mechanism of migrant workers' occupational role enhancement behavior has not been fully revealed. This study aims to construct a theoretical model of the intention to influence the industrialization of migrant workers in the construction industry based on the frameworks of the theory of planned behavior and risk perception theory, and to explore the key factors and cognitive mechanisms in their transformation into industrial workers in the construction industry. Empirical study using structural equation modeling through field collection of 383 questionnaires from migrant construction workers shows that perceived behavioral control, subjective norm, and behavioral attitude all have significant positive effects on behavioral intention, with decreasing direct effects in descending order of magnitude. Perceived behavioral control also predicts professionalization through the mediation of behavioral intentions, and the newly introduced risk perception factor in the model has a negative inhibitory effect on behavioral intentions and actual behavior. This study validates the important role of psychological intention on the industrialization of migrant workers in the construction industry, providing a new perspective to promote their transformation into industrial workers, and laying the foundation for the modern transformation and sustainable industry development.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36089961 PMCID: PMC9451962 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9686998
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Model diagram of TPB.
Figure 2Conceptual model of research hypothesis.
Measures of factors influencing the professionalization of migrant workers in the construction industry.
| Factor | Title number | Question item | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude | AT1 | Professionalization can benefit me financially | Xiuli Yang & Lutang Li [ |
| AT2 | Professionalization can facilitate urban integration | Min Chen [ | |
| AT3 | Professionalization is valuable | Ziyou Shen & Hong Feng [ | |
| AT4 | Professionalization is delightful | Chan [ | |
|
| |||
| Subjective norm | SN1 | Families support their participation in professional transition | Jiayu Liu [ |
| SN2 | Leaders believe that promoting professionalization must be carried out | ||
| SN3 | The workers around me think that the professionalization must be promoted | ||
| SN4 | The government issued a document to promote professionalization | ||
|
| |||
| Perceived behavioral control | PBC1 | I think I can successfully solve the obstacles to professionalization | Carmeli & Schaubroeck [ |
| PBC2 | I think I have the knowledge and ability to professionalize | ||
| PBC3 | I think I have the resources to professionalize (time, equipment, etc.) | ||
|
| |||
| Risk reception | RP1 | I am well aware that a fixed job position after professionalization may reduce income | Slovic [ |
| RP2 | I am well aware that participating in professional training may take up labor time | ||
| RP3 | I fully understand that participation in professionalization may be subject to legal constraints | ||
|
| |||
| Behavioral intention | BI1 | I am willing to learn career-related skills and norms | Xiuli Yang [ |
| BI2 | I am willing to sign a labor employment contract with the company | ||
| BI3 | I would like to participate in professional training on a regular basis | ||
|
| |||
| Behavior | B1 | Take work seriously and pursue work quality | Jiayu Liu [ |
| B2 | Always maintain a “safety first” work awareness | ||
| B3 | Obtain the corresponding qualification certificate | ||
| B4 | Perform work in accordance with operational specifications | ||
Statistical characteristics of the sample.
| Characteristics | Sample size | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 284 | 74.2 |
| Female | 99 | 25.8 |
|
| ||
| Age | ||
| Under 30 years old | 98 | 25.6 |
| 30–40 years old | 124 | 32.4 |
| 40–50 years old | 75 | 19.6 |
| 50–60 years old | 68 | 17.8 |
| 60 years old and above | 18 | 4.7 |
|
| ||
| Educational background | ||
| Primary school | 89 | 23.2 |
| Lower secondary | 145 | 37.9 |
| High school | 88 | 23 |
| University and above | 61 | 15.9 |
|
| ||
| Average annual income | ||
| Less than 5 w | 93 | 24.3 |
| 5–8 w | 153 | 39.9 |
| 8–10 w | 71 | 18.5 |
| 10–15 w | 53 | 13.8 |
| 15 w or more | 13 | 3.4 |
|
| ||
| Number of school-age children | ||
| 0 | 33 | 8.7 |
| 1 | 102 | 26.6 |
| 2–3 | 146 | 38.1 |
| 3 or more | 102 | 26.6 |
Descriptive statistics and Cronbach's alpha.
| Dimension | Variable | Descriptive statistics | Cronbach's alpha | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | SD | |||
| AT | AT1 | 3.77 | 1.099 | 0.819 |
| AT2 | 3.72 | 1.137 | ||
| AT3 | 3.68 | 1.143 | ||
| AT4 | 3.65 | 1.058 | ||
|
| ||||
| SN | SN1 | 3.63 | 1.085 | 0.829 |
| SN2 | 3.65 | 1.121 | ||
| SN3 | 3.73 | 1.14 | ||
| SN4 | 3.69 | 1.118 | ||
|
| ||||
| PBC | PBC1 | 3.71 | 1.08 | 0.765 |
| PBC2 | 3.73 | 1.13 | ||
| PBC3 | 3.69 | 1.151 | ||
|
| ||||
| RP | RP1 | 3.75 | 1.048 | 0.746 |
| RP2 | 3.78 | 1.118 | ||
| RP3 | 3.68 | 1.176 | ||
|
| ||||
| BI | BI1 | 3.77 | 1.143 | 0.747 |
| BI2 | 3.8 | 1.188 | ||
| BI3 | 3.75 | 1.093 | ||
|
| ||||
| B | B1 | 3.63 | 1.088 | 0.832 |
| B2 | 3.65 | 1.166 | ||
| B3 | 3.75 | 1.163 | ||
| B4 | 3.68 | 1.125 | ||
Results of Bartlett's test of sphericity.
| Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy | 0.826 | |
|
| ||
| Bartlett's test of sphericity | Approx. chi-square | 4442.439 |
| df | 210 | |
| Sig. | 0 | |
Results of convergent validity.
| Dimension | Variable | Convergent validity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized regression weights | CR | AVE | ||
| AT | AT1 | 0.808 | 0.822 | 0.538 |
| AT2 | 0.727 | |||
| AT3 | 0.751 | |||
| AT4 | 0.637 | |||
|
| ||||
| SN | SN1 | 0.759 | 0.830 | 0.549 |
| SN2 | 0.724 | |||
| SN3 | 0.723 | |||
| SN4 | 0.758 | |||
|
| ||||
| PBC | PBC1 | 0.787 | 0.766 | 0.523 |
| PBC2 | 0.696 | |||
| PBC3 | 0.682 | |||
|
| ||||
| RP | RP1 | 0.73 | 0.748 | 0.50 |
| RP2 | 0.656 | |||
| RP3 | 0.73 | |||
|
| ||||
| BI | BI1 | 0.826 | 0.755 | 0.510 |
| BI2 | 0.685 | |||
| BI3 | 0.615 | |||
|
| ||||
| B | B1 | 0.736 | 0.828 | 0.55 |
| B2 | 0.719 | |||
| B3 | 0.786 | |||
| B4 | 0.713 | |||
Note. CR = composite reliability and AVE = average variation extraction.
Model fit test.
| Index | Absolute fit | Value-added fit index | Parsimonious fit index | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| RMSEA | GFI | NFI | CFI | IFI | PGFI | PNFI | |
| Ideal value | <3 | <0.05 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.5 | >0.5 |
| Actual value | 2.053 | 0.042 | 0.947 | 0.918 | 0.956 | 0.956 | 0.738 | 0.787 |
Note. χ 2/DF = Chi-square; RMSEA = root-mean-square error of approximation; GFI = goodness-of-fit index; NFI = normative fit index; CFI = comparative fit index; IFI = incremental fit index; PGFI=parsimony goodness-of-fit index; PNFI = parsimony-adjusted normed-fit index.
Direct path test results.
| Hypothesis | Path | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | AT⟶BI | 0.133 | 0.074 | 2.533 | 0.01 |
| H2 | SN⟶BI | 0.135 | 0.058 | 2.604 | 0.009 |
| H3a | PBC⟶BI | 0.241 | 0.068 | 4.261 |
|
| H3b | PBC⟶B | 0.206 | 0.055 | 3.781 |
|
| H4 | BI⟶B | 0.222 | 0.046 | 4.069 |
|
Note. S.E. = standard error; C.R. = composite reliability. Correlation is significant at 0.001 level.
Figure 3Structural equation path diagram.
Mediation path test results.
| Path | Point estimate | Multiplying coefficients | Bootstrapping | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SE | Z | Bias-corrected 95% CI | Percentile 95% CI | ||||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||
| Total effect | |||||||
| PBC⟶B | 0.261 | 0.061 | 4.279 | 0.151 | 0.391 | 0.261 | 0.387 |
| Direct effect | |||||||
| PBC⟶B | 0.207 | 0.062 | 3.339 | 0.92 | 0.332 | 0.92 | 0.332 |
| Indirect effect | |||||||
| PBC⟶B | 0.054 | 0.021 | 2.571 | 0.023 | 0.106 | 0.020 | 0.100 |
Moderating effect test results.
| Path | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RP⟶B | 0.178 | 0.56 | 3.255 | 0.001 |
| BI⟶B | 0.181 | 0.45 | 3.288 | 0.001 |
| RP | −0.225 | 0.50 | −3.861 |
|
Note. S.E. = standard error; CR = composite reliability. Correlation is significant at 0.05 level. Correlation is significant at 0.001 level.