| Literature DB >> 36089957 |
Abstract
The current and long-term regional economic imbalance in China requires ongoing attention. To ensure the balanced development of China's renewable energy, it is therefore important to examine the causes of the differences in China's renewable energy from a variety of perspectives. The spatial distribution pattern and characteristics of China's per capita GDP (gross domestic product) from 2012 to 2021 were examined in this study using the exploratory spatial data analysis tool. In addition, it conducts an empirical investigation into the spatial spillover effect of RED and the manufacturing agglomeration in China (regional economic development). The findings indicate that in the eastern region, the total backward link value of the feedback effect of 17 industrial sectors is 0.8524, and in the central region, the value is 0.8139. The real per capita GDP of neighboring provinces will increase by 0.118% for every 1% increase in manufacturing agglomeration level. According to the overall ranking, China's RED level is very uneven due to a number of factors. We should direct and encourage the manufacturing industry to congregate in various regions, optimize the spatial pattern of manufacturing industry agglomeration, and fully exploit SSE in order to promote China's RED and reduce the difference in RE.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36089957 PMCID: PMC9451975 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8935743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Regional economic ties.
Figure 2The mechanism of financial agglomeration affecting RED.
Figure 3Theoretical analysis framework.
Test results of Moran's I index of economic level.
| Year | Moran's I |
|
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 0.236 | 0.006 |
| 2013 | 0.266 | 0.009 |
| 2014 | 0.241 | 0.007 |
| 2015 | 0.268 | 0.006 |
| 2016 | 0.261 | 0.008 |
| 2017 | 0.255 | 0.007 |
| 2018 | 0.251 | 0.008 |
| 2019 | 0.267 | 0.008 |
| 2020 | 0.249 | 0.011 |
| 2021 | 0.268 | 0.009 |
Figure 4Ranking status of market segmentation degree in each province and market.
Figure 5Intra-regional multiplier effect.
Figure 6Inter-regional SE.
Figure 7Inter-regional feedback effect.
Model spatial effect decomposition.
| Variable | Direct effect | Indirect effect | Total effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core explanatory variable | 0.047 (1.683) | 0.118 | 0.168 |
| Labor input | −0.203 | −0.562 | −0.782 |
| Fixed-asset investment | 0.052 | 0.036 (0.605) | 0.086 (1.427) |
| Technical innovation | 0.096 | −2.986 | −0.186 (−4.258) |
| Infrastructure construction | 0.081 | 0.008 (0.103) | 0.086 |
| Urbanization | 0.328 | −0.639 | −0.225 (−1.428) |
| Degree of opening to the outside world | 0.047 | 0.017 (0.568) | 0.055 |
| Government policy support | −0.136 | −2.418 | −0.369 |
Note. , and represent the significance level of 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively. The numbers in brackets are the t values of the corresponding variable coefficients.
Figure 8Total factor productivity of mother cities outside each district.
Figure 9RE: level per capita score in China.