| Literature DB >> 36089946 |
Wenbin Fang1, Chongsen Ma2, Zeyang Lei2.
Abstract
Excellence in corporate culture is the key to achieving sustainable business development. Sustainability can be a source of success, innovation and profitability for a company, driving the achievement of low-carbon goals for transport infrastructure enterprises. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between corporate culture and corporate sustainability from the perspective of transport infrastructure enterprises, and to identify which corporate culture factors may have an impact on the sustainable low carbon development of transport infrastructure enterprises. To achieve this, we constructed a structural equation model based on 351 cases in Hunan Province and examined the relationship between corporate culture and sustainable low-carbon development using partial least squares structural equation modeling. The findings suggest that corporate values and corporate culture management capabilities play an important role in promoting sustainable development of transport infrastructure enterprises at the economic and low-carbon levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36089946 PMCID: PMC9451960 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4629422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Research model.
Statistics on latent and observed variables.
| Latent variable | Observed variable |
|---|---|
| Corporate values | Social responsibility |
| Values alignment | |
| Shared vision | |
| Innovation orientation | |
| Corporate culture management capabilities | Cultural innovation |
| Cultural management model | |
| Cultural migration | |
| Willingness to accept culture | |
| Sustainable economic impact | Market orientation of metro behaviour |
| Government subsidies | |
| Long-term cost savings | |
| Green transition inputs | |
| Sustainable operational governance | Risk prevention |
| Green exploration | |
| Green strategy | |
| Green behaviour | |
| Sustainable low-carbon operation | Green dynamic capabilities |
| Green product development | |
| Green innovation | |
| Carbon reduction capability |
Structure of the surveyed population.
| Variables | Type | Value | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 176 | 50.14 |
| Female | 175 | 49.86 | |
| Occupation | Corporate senior management | 23 | 6.55 |
| Middle management | 51 | 14.53 | |
| Enterprise grassroots staff | 136 | 38.75 | |
| Government departments | 73 | 20.8 | |
| Researchers and academics | 20 | 5.7 | |
| Others | 48 | 13.68 | |
| Title level | Full senior title | 27 | 7.69 |
| Associate title | 124 | 35.33 | |
| Intermediate title | 113 | 32.19 | |
| Junior and below | 87 | 24.79 | |
| Years of work | <5 | 119 | 33.9 |
| 5–10 | 83 | 23.65 | |
| 10–15 | 89 | 25.36 | |
| >15 | 60 | 17.09 |
Good-to-fit table.
| Indicator | Value | Judgment criteria |
|---|---|---|
| SRMR | 0.066 | <0.08 |
| NFI | 0.917 | >0.9 |
Indicator system for PLS analysis model.
| Latent variable | Cronbach`s | Composite reliability | Factor loading |
| VIF | Explicit variable indicators |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate values | 0.891 | 0.925 | 0.835 | 28.341 | 2.291 | CV1 |
| 0.872 | 30.025 | 2.651 | CV2 | |||
| 0.827 | 31.222 | 2.031 | CV3 | |||
| 0.939 | 33.764 | 4.134 | CV4 | |||
| Corporate culture management capabilities | 0.881 | 0.918 | 0.861 | 30.394 | 2.257 | CMC1 |
| 0.898 | 31.335 | 2.112 | CMC2 | |||
| 0.842 | 31.892 | 2.044 | CMC3 | |||
| 0.831 | 30.935 | 2.727 | CMC4 | |||
| Sustainable economic impact | 0.888 | 0.922 | 0.838 | 32.159 | 2.06 | SEE1 |
| 0.854 | 31.707 | 2.289 | SEE2 | |||
| 0.862 | 32.493 | 2.321 | SEE3 | |||
| 0.905 | 33.163 | 2.97 | SEE4 | |||
| Sustainable operational governance | 0.889 | 0.924 | 0.853 | 29.200 | 2.327 | SOG1 |
| 0.853 | 29.916 | 2.328 | SOG2 | |||
| 0.832 | 33.411 | 2.074 | SOG3 | |||
| 0.927 | 30.681 | 3.534 | SOG4 | |||
| Sustainable low carbon operation | 0.891 | 0.925 | 0.864 | 31.518 | 2.426 | SC01 |
| 0.846 | 30.888 | 2.196 | SC02 | |||
| 0.853 | 30.253 | 2.182 | SC03 | |||
| 0.910 | 31.239 | 3.097 | SC04 |
Latent variable AVE values.
| Latent variables | Average variance extracted |
|---|---|
| Corporate values | 0.755 |
| Corporate culture management capabilities | 0.737 |
| Sustainable economic effects | 0.748 |
| Sustainable operational governance | 0.752 |
| Sustainable low-carbon operation | 0.755 |
Correlation coefficients between AVE square root and latent variables.
| Latent variables | Corporate values | Corporate culture management capabilities | Sustainable economic effects | Sustainable operational governance | Sustainable low-carbon operation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate values | 0.869 | ||||
| Corporate culture management capabilities | 0.569 | 0.859 | |||
| Sustainable economic effects | 0.544 | 0.502 | 0.869 | ||
| Sustainable operational governance | 0.503 | 0.434 | 0.542 | 0.865 | |
| Sustainable low-carbon operation | 0.541 | 0.472 | 0.548 | 0.540 | 0.867 |
Description of model hypothesis testing results.
| Hypothesis | Relationship | Path coefficient |
|
| Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ha1 | CMC-> SC0 | 0.178 | 3.122 | 0.002 | Accept |
| Ha2 | CMC ->SEE | 0.230 | 4.314 | <0.001 | Accept |
| Hb3 | CV ->CMC | 0.569 | 14.020 | <0.001 | Accept |
| Hb1 | CV ->SC0 | 0.199 | 3.422 | 0.001 | Accept |
| Hb2 | CV ->SOG | 0.541 | 13.481 | <0.001 | Accept |
| Hc | SEE ->SC0 | 0.244 | 4.234 | <0.001 | Accept |
| Hd1 | SOG ->SC0 | 0.225 | 3.997 | <0.001 | Accept |
| Hd2 | SOG ->SEE | 0.431 | 14.020 | <0.001 | Accept |
Figure 2Structural model.