Winnifred K Kansiime1, Richard K Mugambe2, Edwinah Atusingwize2, Solomon T Wafula2, Vincent Nsereko2, Tonny Ssekamatte2, Aisha Nalugya2, Eric Stephen Coker3, John C Ssempebwa2, John Bosco Isunju2. 1. Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. winniekansiime@musph.ac.ug. 2. Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda. 3. Department of Environmental and Global Health, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, Room 4160, P. O. Box 100188, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor indoor air quality (IAQ) is a leading cause of respiratory and cardiopulmonary illnesses. Particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon monoxide (CO) are critical indicators of IAQ, yet there is limited evidence of their concentrations in informal urban settlements in low-income countries. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed household characteristics that predict the concentrations of PM2.5 and CO within households in an informal settlement in Fort Portal City, Uganda. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 374 households. Concentrations of PM2.5 and CO were measured using a multi-purpose laser particle detector and a carbon monoxide IAQ meter, respectively. Data on household characteristics were collected using a structured questionnaire and an observational checklist. Data were analysed using STATA version 14.0. Linear regression was used to establish the relationship between PM2.5, CO concentrations and household cooking characteristics. RESULTS: The majority (89%, 332/374) of the households used charcoal for cooking. More than half (52%, 194/374) cooked outdoors. Cooking areas had significantly higher PM2.5 and CO concentrations (t = 18.14, p ≤ 0.05) and (t = 5.77 p ≤ 0.05), respectively. Cooking outdoors was associated with a 0.112 increase in the PM2.5 concentrations in the cooking area (0.112 [95% CI: -0.069, 1.614; p = 0.033]). Cooking with moderately polluting fuel was associated with a 0.718 increase in CO concentrations (0.718 [95% CI: 0.084, 1.352; p = 0.027]) in the living area. CONCLUSIONS: The cooking and the living areas had high concentrations of PM2.5 and CO during the cooking time. Cooking with charcoal resulted in higher CO in the living area. Furthermore, cooking outdoors did not have a protective effect against PM2.5, and ambient PM2.5 exceeded the WHO Air quality limits. Interventions to improve the indoor air quality in informal settlements should promote a switch to cleaner cooking energy and improvement in the ambient air quality.
BACKGROUND: Poor indoor air quality (IAQ) is a leading cause of respiratory and cardiopulmonary illnesses. Particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon monoxide (CO) are critical indicators of IAQ, yet there is limited evidence of their concentrations in informal urban settlements in low-income countries. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed household characteristics that predict the concentrations of PM2.5 and CO within households in an informal settlement in Fort Portal City, Uganda. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 374 households. Concentrations of PM2.5 and CO were measured using a multi-purpose laser particle detector and a carbon monoxide IAQ meter, respectively. Data on household characteristics were collected using a structured questionnaire and an observational checklist. Data were analysed using STATA version 14.0. Linear regression was used to establish the relationship between PM2.5, CO concentrations and household cooking characteristics. RESULTS: The majority (89%, 332/374) of the households used charcoal for cooking. More than half (52%, 194/374) cooked outdoors. Cooking areas had significantly higher PM2.5 and CO concentrations (t = 18.14, p ≤ 0.05) and (t = 5.77 p ≤ 0.05), respectively. Cooking outdoors was associated with a 0.112 increase in the PM2.5 concentrations in the cooking area (0.112 [95% CI: -0.069, 1.614; p = 0.033]). Cooking with moderately polluting fuel was associated with a 0.718 increase in CO concentrations (0.718 [95% CI: 0.084, 1.352; p = 0.027]) in the living area. CONCLUSIONS: The cooking and the living areas had high concentrations of PM2.5 and CO during the cooking time. Cooking with charcoal resulted in higher CO in the living area. Furthermore, cooking outdoors did not have a protective effect against PM2.5, and ambient PM2.5 exceeded the WHO Air quality limits. Interventions to improve the indoor air quality in informal settlements should promote a switch to cleaner cooking energy and improvement in the ambient air quality.
Authors: Eric S Coker; A Kofi Amegah; Ernest Mwebaze; Joel Ssematimba; Engineer Bainomugisha Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Tonny Ssekamatte; John Bosco Isunju; Bonny Enock Balugaba; Doreen Nakirya; Jimmy Osuret; Patience Mguni; Richard Mugambe; Bas van Vliet Journal: Int J Environ Health Res Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Katherine Woolley; Suzanne E Bartington; Francis D Pope; Malcolm J Price; G Neil Thomas; Telesphore Kabera Journal: Arch Environ Occup Health Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 1.663
Authors: Mi-Sun Lee; Jing-qing Hang; Feng-ying Zhang; He-lian Dai; Li Su; David C Christiani Journal: Environ Health Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Daniel Pope; Esperanza Diaz; Tone Smith-Sivertsen; Rolv T Lie; Per Bakke; John R Balmes; Kirk R Smith; Nigel G Bruce Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Zoë A Chafe; Michael Brauer; Zbigniew Klimont; Rita Van Dingenen; Sumi Mehta; Shilpa Rao; Keywan Riahi; Frank Dentener; Kirk R Smith Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 9.031