| Literature DB >> 36088321 |
Zhengsheng Wang1, Xingxi Zhang2, Liu Liu3, Ling Tang1, Ying Zhu1, Zhongliang Bai4, Ren Chen5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The social network of the core members of elderly care service social organizations could affect the performance of the organization, while studies concerning its related factors are limited. We aimed to explore factors that are associated with the social network of core members from elderly care service social organizations and provide references and suggestions for improving elderly care services.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Core members; Elderly care services; Social network; Social organizations
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36088321 PMCID: PMC9464390 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08545-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.908
Social demographic characteristics of core members and the results of the univariate analysis of social networks in social organizations (N = 308)
| Variables | N (%) | Social networks scores(M(IQR)) | Z/χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -2.341 | 0.019* | |||
| Male | 178(57.8) | 14(8) | ||
| Female | 130(42.2) | 12(8.25) | ||
| 3.068 | 0.216 | |||
| ≤ 40 | 74(24) | 12(8) | ||
| 41–49 | 60(19.5) | 14(9.75) | ||
| ≥ 50 | 174(56.5) | 14(8) | ||
| -0.323 | 0.747 | |||
| Han | 305(99) | 14(8) | ||
| Others | 3(1) | 15(8) | ||
| 25.904 | < 0.001* | |||
| Junior high school and below | 91(29.5) | 11(7) | ||
| Senior high school | 112(36.4) | 14(8) | ||
| College degree and above | 105(34.1) | 16(10) | ||
| -0.330 | 0.741 | |||
| Married | 284(92.2) | 14(8) | ||
| Others | 24(7.8) | 11.5(9) | ||
| -0.217 | 0.828 | |||
| Have | 62(20.1) | 14(8.5) | ||
| Not have | 246(79.9) | 14(8.25) | ||
| -1.015 | 0.310 | |||
| Yes | 289(93.8) | 14(8) | ||
| No | 19(6.2) | 14(9) | ||
| 7.627 | 0.022* | |||
| ≤ 1 | 98(31.8) | 14(8) | ||
| 2–5 | 119(38.6) | 12(8) | ||
| ≥ 6 | 91(29.5) | 14(9) | ||
| 4.906 | 0.086 | |||
| ≤ 1 | 77(25) | 14(8.5) | ||
| 2–5 | 109(35.4) | 13(7) | ||
| ≥ 6 | 122(39.6) | 14(9.25) | ||
| -0.246 | 0.806 | |||
| Yes | 48(15.6) | 14(10) | ||
| No | 260(84.4) | 14(8) | ||
| -1.391 | 0.164 | |||
| Yes | 203(65.9) | 14(7) | ||
| No | 105(34.1) | 12(9) | ||
| -1.796 | 0.072 | |||
| Yes | 210(68.2) | 14(8) | ||
| No | 98(31.8) | 12(7) | ||
| -4.788 | < 0.001* | |||
| Yes | 174(56.5) | 17(10.75) | ||
| No | 134(43.5) | 12(7) | ||
| -3.934 | < 0.001* | |||
| Yes | 84(27.3) | 15(9) | ||
| No | 224(72.7) | 12(8) |
*Represents statistically significant
Binary logistic regression analysis of the social network scores
| Variables | B | SE | Wald | AOR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female(REF.) | |||||
| Male | 0.536 | 0.260 | 2.518 | 0.037 | 1.708(1.034–2.823) |
| Junior high school and below(REF.) | |||||
| Senior high school | 0.654 | 0.307 | 4.534 | 0.033 | 1.923(1.053–3.511) |
| College degree and above | 1.102 | 0.325 | 11.481 | 0.001 | 3.010(1.591–5.692) |
| ≤ 1(REF.) | |||||
| 2–5 | -0.249 | 0.300 | 0.693 | 0.405 | 0.799(0.433–1.402) |
| ≥ 6 | 0.224 | 0.328 | 0.465 | 0.495 | 1.251(0.658–2.378) |
| No(REF.) | |||||
| Yes | -0.413 | 0.260 | 2.518 | 0.113 | 0.662(0.397–1.102) |
| No(REF.) | |||||
| Yes | 0.816 | 0.288 | 8.008 | 0.005 | 2.260(1.285–3.976) |
| -0.859 | 0.408 | 4.435 | 0.035 |