Jennifer Velloza1, Deborah Donnell2, Sybil Hosek3, Peter L Anderson4, Z Mike Chirenje5, Nyaradzo Mgodi5, Linda-Gail Bekker6, Mark A Marzinke7, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe8, Connie Celum9. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: jennifer.velloza@ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Department of Infectious Diseases, Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. 5. University of Zimbabwe Clinical Trials Research Centre, Harare, Zimbabwe. 6. The Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. 7. Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 8. Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 9. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescent girls and young women in southern and eastern Africa have adherence challenges with daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). High adherence is most important during periods of HIV risk (prevention-effective adherence). We aimed to describe HIV risk behaviour and to understand patterns in PrEP adherence during periods of risk among adolescent girls and young women from sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We did a secondary analysis of the HPTN 082 trial, an open-label, interventional, randomised controlled trial of sexually active adolescent girls and young women (aged 16-25 years) testing negative for HIV in Johannesburg and Cape Town, South Africa, and in Harare, Zimbabwe. The primary outcomes were high cumulative PrEP adherence, dichotomised as intracellular tenofovir diphosphate concentrations of at least 700 fmol/punch in dried blood spots at weeks 13, 26, and 52, and high recent PrEP adherence, dichotomised as plasma tenofovir concentrations of at least 40 ng/mL at weeks 13, 26, and 52, among participants who accepted PrEP. We collected data on sexual behaviour every 3 months. We categorised visits into a binary variable of any HIV risk based on condomless sex, more than one sexual partner, primary partner's HIV status and antiretroviral use, transactional sex, drug or alcohol use around sexual activity, and laboratory-diagnosed STIs. We used generalised estimating equations to evaluate associations between HIV risk (reflecting behaviour during the previous 3 months) and high cumulative and recent adherence to PrEP and any PrEP use (quantifiable drug concentrations). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02732730. FINDINGS: Between Oct 12, 2016, and Oct 25, 2018, 451 women were recruited, and 427 participants (median age 21·0 years [IQR 19·0-22·0]) were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. The proportion of participants reporting at least one HIV risk factor decreased significantly over follow-up, from 364 (85%) participants at enrolment, 226 (60%) at week 13, and 243 (65%) at week 26, to 224 (61%) at week 52 (p<0·0001). Any HIV risk was significantly associated with high PrEP adherence, measured by both tenofovir diphosphate concentrations of at least 700 fmol/punch (adjusted relative risk 1·57 [95% CI 1·09-2·25]; p=0·014) and plasma tenofovir concentrations of at least 40 ng/mL (1·36 [1·11-1·65]; p=0·0025). Any HIV risk was also associated with quantifiable concentrations of tenofovir diphosphate (1·15 [1·03-1·29]; p=0·013) and tenofovir (1·27 [1·09-1·49]; p=0·0022). We observed significant dose-response relationships between number of HIV risk factors and PrEP drug concentrations. INTERPRETATION: The association between any HIV risk and high PrEP adherence suggests that adolescent girls and young women were able to use PrEP during periods of risk, an indicator of prevention-effective PrEP adherence. Our findings support a shift in the PrEP framework to acknowledge prevention-effective adherence practices, which might improve PrEP delivery and adherence support for adolescent girls and young women in HIV-endemic settings. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
BACKGROUND: Adolescent girls and young women in southern and eastern Africa have adherence challenges with daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). High adherence is most important during periods of HIV risk (prevention-effective adherence). We aimed to describe HIV risk behaviour and to understand patterns in PrEP adherence during periods of risk among adolescent girls and young women from sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: We did a secondary analysis of the HPTN 082 trial, an open-label, interventional, randomised controlled trial of sexually active adolescent girls and young women (aged 16-25 years) testing negative for HIV in Johannesburg and Cape Town, South Africa, and in Harare, Zimbabwe. The primary outcomes were high cumulative PrEP adherence, dichotomised as intracellular tenofovir diphosphate concentrations of at least 700 fmol/punch in dried blood spots at weeks 13, 26, and 52, and high recent PrEP adherence, dichotomised as plasma tenofovir concentrations of at least 40 ng/mL at weeks 13, 26, and 52, among participants who accepted PrEP. We collected data on sexual behaviour every 3 months. We categorised visits into a binary variable of any HIV risk based on condomless sex, more than one sexual partner, primary partner's HIV status and antiretroviral use, transactional sex, drug or alcohol use around sexual activity, and laboratory-diagnosed STIs. We used generalised estimating equations to evaluate associations between HIV risk (reflecting behaviour during the previous 3 months) and high cumulative and recent adherence to PrEP and any PrEP use (quantifiable drug concentrations). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02732730. FINDINGS: Between Oct 12, 2016, and Oct 25, 2018, 451 women were recruited, and 427 participants (median age 21·0 years [IQR 19·0-22·0]) were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. The proportion of participants reporting at least one HIV risk factor decreased significantly over follow-up, from 364 (85%) participants at enrolment, 226 (60%) at week 13, and 243 (65%) at week 26, to 224 (61%) at week 52 (p<0·0001). Any HIV risk was significantly associated with high PrEP adherence, measured by both tenofovir diphosphate concentrations of at least 700 fmol/punch (adjusted relative risk 1·57 [95% CI 1·09-2·25]; p=0·014) and plasma tenofovir concentrations of at least 40 ng/mL (1·36 [1·11-1·65]; p=0·0025). Any HIV risk was also associated with quantifiable concentrations of tenofovir diphosphate (1·15 [1·03-1·29]; p=0·013) and tenofovir (1·27 [1·09-1·49]; p=0·0022). We observed significant dose-response relationships between number of HIV risk factors and PrEP drug concentrations. INTERPRETATION: The association between any HIV risk and high PrEP adherence suggests that adolescent girls and young women were able to use PrEP during periods of risk, an indicator of prevention-effective PrEP adherence. Our findings support a shift in the PrEP framework to acknowledge prevention-effective adherence practices, which might improve PrEP delivery and adherence support for adolescent girls and young women in HIV-endemic settings. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Mackenzie L Cottrell; Kuo H Yang; Heather M A Prince; Craig Sykes; Nicole White; Stephanie Malone; Evan S Dellon; Ryan D Madanick; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael G Hudgens; Jacob Wulff; Kristine B Patterson; Julie A E Nelson; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jared M Baeten; Thesla Palanee-Phillips; Elizabeth R Brown; Katie Schwartz; Lydia E Soto-Torres; Vaneshree Govender; Nyaradzo M Mgodi; Flavia Matovu Kiweewa; Gonasagrie Nair; Felix Mhlanga; Samantha Siva; Linda-Gail Bekker; Nitesha Jeenarain; Zakir Gaffoor; Francis Martinson; Bonus Makanani; Arendevi Pather; Logashvari Naidoo; Marla Husnik; Barbra A Richardson; Urvi M Parikh; John W Mellors; Mark A Marzinke; Craig W Hendrix; Ariane van der Straten; Gita Ramjee; Zvavahera M Chirenje; Clemensia Nakabiito; Taha E Taha; Judith Jones; Ashley Mayo; Rachel Scheckter; Jennifer Berthiaume; Edward Livant; Cindy Jacobson; Patrick Ndase; Rhonda White; Karen Patterson; Donna Germuga; Beth Galaska; Katherine Bunge; Devika Singh; Daniel W Szydlo; Elizabeth T Montgomery; Barbara S Mensch; Kristine Torjesen; Cynthia I Grossman; Nahida Chakhtoura; Annalene Nel; Zeda Rosenberg; Ian McGowan; Sharon Hillier Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Cheryl Hendrickson; Lawrence Long; David van de Vijver; Charles Boucher; Heidi O'Bra; Cassidy W Claassen; Mwansa Njelesani; Crispin Moyo; Daliso B Mumba; Hasina Subedar; Lloyd Mulenga; Sydney Rosen; Brooke E Nichols Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 12.767
Authors: Peter L Anderson; Albert Y Liu; Jose R Castillo-Mancilla; Edward M Gardner; Sharon M Seifert; Cricket McHugh; Theresa Wagner; Kayla Campbell; Mary Morrow; Mustafa Ibrahim; Susan Buchbinder; Lane R Bushman; Jennifer J Kiser; Samantha MaWhinney Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Lauren M Hill; Bertha Maseko; Maganizo Chagomerana; Mina C Hosseinipour; Linda-Gail Bekker; Audrey Pettifor; Nora E Rosenberg Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Isolde Birdthistle; Clare Tanton; Andrew Tomita; Kristen de Graaf; Susan B Schaffnit; Frank Tanser; Emma Slaymaker Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Jennifer Velloza; Sybil Hosek; Deborah Donnell; Peter L Anderson; Mike Chirenje; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Linda-Gail Bekker; Sinead Delany-Moretlwe; Connie Celum Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 5.396