Claire E P Smith1, Paul K Marcom2, Zahi Mitri3, Naomi Y Ko4. 1. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH 1010, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. 2. Duke Cancer Center, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 4. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 820 Harrison Ave, FGH 1010, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. naomi.ko@bmc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: HER2-directed therapies enable some patients with de novo HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to achieve long-term, durable responses (DR). Expert opinion dictates indefinite HER2-directed therapies for patients who achieve DRs, but real-world examples of this practice are lacking in the literature. Patient factors that predict DR continue to be elucidated. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with de novo HER2 + MBC. DR is defined as absence of progression/death at any point after diagnosis. Controls are patients with evidence of progression/death. Age, ER/PR status, sites of metastasis, surgical resection of primary tumor, and initial treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: 96 patients with de novo HER2 + MBC, 28 with DR, and 68 with progression were identified. 75% of patients with DR had a single metastatic site, compared with 47% of patients with progression (OR 3.7, p = 0.01). 64% of patients with DR received a regimen containing trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and a taxane, while 28% of patients who progressed did (OR 4.5, p < 0.001). 57% of patients with DR underwent surgical removal of breast primary, compared with 24% of patients who progressed (OR 4.3, p = 0.002.) Among patients with DR, nine patients have been receiving trastuzumab for over ten years with no evidence of disease and one patient opted to discontinue trastuzumab. CONCLUSION: Nearly a third of patients with de novo HER2 + MBC achieved DR. Factors that correlate with DR include single metastatic site, initial trastuzumab, pertuzumab and taxane therapy, and surgical resection of primary tumor. Among patients with DR, indefinite trastuzumab administration is the norm.
PURPOSE: HER2-directed therapies enable some patients with de novo HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to achieve long-term, durable responses (DR). Expert opinion dictates indefinite HER2-directed therapies for patients who achieve DRs, but real-world examples of this practice are lacking in the literature. Patient factors that predict DR continue to be elucidated. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with de novo HER2 + MBC. DR is defined as absence of progression/death at any point after diagnosis. Controls are patients with evidence of progression/death. Age, ER/PR status, sites of metastasis, surgical resection of primary tumor, and initial treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: 96 patients with de novo HER2 + MBC, 28 with DR, and 68 with progression were identified. 75% of patients with DR had a single metastatic site, compared with 47% of patients with progression (OR 3.7, p = 0.01). 64% of patients with DR received a regimen containing trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and a taxane, while 28% of patients who progressed did (OR 4.5, p < 0.001). 57% of patients with DR underwent surgical removal of breast primary, compared with 24% of patients who progressed (OR 4.3, p = 0.002.) Among patients with DR, nine patients have been receiving trastuzumab for over ten years with no evidence of disease and one patient opted to discontinue trastuzumab. CONCLUSION: Nearly a third of patients with de novo HER2 + MBC achieved DR. Factors that correlate with DR include single metastatic site, initial trastuzumab, pertuzumab and taxane therapy, and surgical resection of primary tumor. Among patients with DR, indefinite trastuzumab administration is the norm.
Authors: D J Slamon; B Leyland-Jones; S Shak; H Fuchs; V Paton; A Bajamonde; T Fleming; W Eiermann; J Wolter; M Pegram; J Baselga; L Norton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ben Y Durkee; Yushen Qian; Erqi L Pollom; Martin T King; Sara A Dudley; Jenny L Shaffer; Daniel T Chang; Iris C Gibbs; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Kathleen C Horst Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sharon H Giordano; Sarah Temin; Jeffrey J Kirshner; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Jennie R Crews; Nancy E Davidson; Francisco J Esteva; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Ian Krop; Jennifer Levinson; Nancy U Lin; Shanu Modi; Debra A Patt; Edith A Perez; Jane Perlmutter; Naren Ramakrishna; Eric P Winer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sandra M Swain; José Baselga; Sung-Bae Kim; Jungsil Ro; Vladimir Semiglazov; Mario Campone; Eva Ciruelos; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sarah Heeson; Emma Clark; Graham Ross; Mark C Benyunes; Javier Cortés Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K Harano; X Lei; A M Gonzalez-Angulo; R K Murthy; V Valero; E A Mittendorf; N T Ueno; G N Hortobagyi; M Chavez-MacGregor Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-08-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Sandra M Swain; David Miles; Sung-Bae Kim; Young-Hyuck Im; Seock-Ah Im; Vladimir Semiglazov; Eva Ciruelos; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sherene Loi; Estefanía Monturus; Emma Clark; Adam Knott; Eleonora Restuccia; Mark C Benyunes; Javier Cortés Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-03-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: D A Yardley; D Tripathy; A M Brufsky; H S Rugo; P A Kaufman; M Mayer; J Magidson; B Yoo; C Quah; M Ulcickas Yood Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 7.640