D Yang1, T T Y Lee1, K K L Lai1, T P Lam2, R M Castelein3, J C Y Cheng2, Yong Ping Zheng4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. 2. SH Ho Scoliosis Research Lab, Joint Scoliosis Research Center of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and Nanjing University, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China. yongping.zheng@polyu.edu.hk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bending Asymmetry Index (BAI) has been proposed to characterize the types of scoliotic curve in three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Scolioscan has demonstrated its validity and reliability in scoliosis assessment with manual assessment-based X-ray imaging. The objective of this study is to investigate the ultrasound-derived BAI method to X-ray imaging of scoliosis, with supplementary information provided for the pre-surgery planning. METHODS: About 30 pre-surgery scoliosis subjects (9 males and 21 females; Cobb: 50.9 ± 19.7°, range 18°-115°) were investigated retrospectively. Each subject underwent three-posture X-ray scanning supine on a plain mattress on the same day. BAI is an indicator to distinguish structural or non-structural curves through the spine flexibility information obtained from lateral bending spinal profiles. BAI was calculated semi-automatically with manual annotation of vertebral centroids and pelvis level inclination adjustment. BAI classification was validated with the scoliotic curve type and traditional Lenke classification using side-bending Cobb angle measurement (S-Cobb). RESULTS: 82 curves from 30 pre-surgery scoliosis patients were included. The correlation coefficient was R2 = 0.730 (p < 0.05) between BAI and S-Cobb. In terms of scoliotic curve type classification, all curves were correctly classified; out of 30 subjects, 1 case was confirmed as misclassified when applying to Lenke classification earlier, thus has been adjusted. CONCLUSION: BAI method has demonstrated its inter-modality versatility in X-ray imaging application. The curve type classification and the pre-surgery Lenke classification both indicated promising performances upon the exploratory dataset. A fully-automated of BAI measurement is surely an interesting direction to continue our endeavor. Deep learning on the vertebral-level segmentation should be involved in further study.
PURPOSE: Bending Asymmetry Index (BAI) has been proposed to characterize the types of scoliotic curve in three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. Scolioscan has demonstrated its validity and reliability in scoliosis assessment with manual assessment-based X-ray imaging. The objective of this study is to investigate the ultrasound-derived BAI method to X-ray imaging of scoliosis, with supplementary information provided for the pre-surgery planning. METHODS: About 30 pre-surgery scoliosis subjects (9 males and 21 females; Cobb: 50.9 ± 19.7°, range 18°-115°) were investigated retrospectively. Each subject underwent three-posture X-ray scanning supine on a plain mattress on the same day. BAI is an indicator to distinguish structural or non-structural curves through the spine flexibility information obtained from lateral bending spinal profiles. BAI was calculated semi-automatically with manual annotation of vertebral centroids and pelvis level inclination adjustment. BAI classification was validated with the scoliotic curve type and traditional Lenke classification using side-bending Cobb angle measurement (S-Cobb). RESULTS: 82 curves from 30 pre-surgery scoliosis patients were included. The correlation coefficient was R2 = 0.730 (p < 0.05) between BAI and S-Cobb. In terms of scoliotic curve type classification, all curves were correctly classified; out of 30 subjects, 1 case was confirmed as misclassified when applying to Lenke classification earlier, thus has been adjusted. CONCLUSION: BAI method has demonstrated its inter-modality versatility in X-ray imaging application. The curve type classification and the pre-surgery Lenke classification both indicated promising performances upon the exploratory dataset. A fully-automated of BAI measurement is surely an interesting direction to continue our endeavor. Deep learning on the vertebral-level segmentation should be involved in further study.