Cuiping Zhou1,2, Xiaohua Ban3, Lin Luo2, Changzheng Shi4. 1. Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Radiology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, No.1 Haiyuan Road Futian District, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, China. 3. Department of Medical Imaging Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China. 4. Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. tsczcn@jnu.edu.cn.
Abstract
PURPOSES: To determine the CT features and demographic data predictive of type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) that can help distinguish this neoplasm from fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) and oncocytoma. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with type 2 PRCC, 48 with fpAML, and 47 with oncocytoma in the kidney from multiple centers were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic data and CT features of type 2 PRCC were analyzed and compared with those of fpAML and oncocytoma by univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the predictive factors for differential diagnosis. Then, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to further assess the logistic regression model and set the threshold level values of the numerical parameters. RESULTS: Older age (≥ 46.5 years), unenhanced lesion-to-renal cortex attenuation (RLRCA) < 1.21, corticomedullary ratio of lesion to renal cortex net enhancement (RLRCNE) < 0.32, and size ≥ 30.1 mm were independent predictors for distinguishing type 2 PRCC from fpAML (OR 14.155, 8.332, and 57.745, respectively, P < 0.05 for all). The area under the curve (AUC) of the multiple logistic regression model in the ROC curve analysis was 0.970. In the combined evaluation, the four independent predictors had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.896 and 0.889, respectively. A corticomedullary RLRCNE < 0.61, irregular shape, and male sex were independent predictors for the differential diagnosis of type 2 PRCC from oncocytoma (OR 15.714, 12.158, and 6.175, respectively, P < 0.05 for all). In the combined evaluation, the three independent predictors had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.889 and 0.979, respectively. The AUC of the multiple logistic regression model in the ROC curve analysis was 0.964. CONCLUSION: The combined application of CT features and demographic data had good ability in distinguishing type 2 PRCC from fpAML and oncocytoma, respectively.
PURPOSES: To determine the CT features and demographic data predictive of type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) that can help distinguish this neoplasm from fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fpAML) and oncocytoma. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with type 2 PRCC, 48 with fpAML, and 47 with oncocytoma in the kidney from multiple centers were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic data and CT features of type 2 PRCC were analyzed and compared with those of fpAML and oncocytoma by univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the predictive factors for differential diagnosis. Then, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to further assess the logistic regression model and set the threshold level values of the numerical parameters. RESULTS: Older age (≥ 46.5 years), unenhanced lesion-to-renal cortex attenuation (RLRCA) < 1.21, corticomedullary ratio of lesion to renal cortex net enhancement (RLRCNE) < 0.32, and size ≥ 30.1 mm were independent predictors for distinguishing type 2 PRCC from fpAML (OR 14.155, 8.332, and 57.745, respectively, P < 0.05 for all). The area under the curve (AUC) of the multiple logistic regression model in the ROC curve analysis was 0.970. In the combined evaluation, the four independent predictors had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.896 and 0.889, respectively. A corticomedullary RLRCNE < 0.61, irregular shape, and male sex were independent predictors for the differential diagnosis of type 2 PRCC from oncocytoma (OR 15.714, 12.158, and 6.175, respectively, P < 0.05 for all). In the combined evaluation, the three independent predictors had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.889 and 0.979, respectively. The AUC of the multiple logistic regression model in the ROC curve analysis was 0.964. CONCLUSION: The combined application of CT features and demographic data had good ability in distinguishing type 2 PRCC from fpAML and oncocytoma, respectively.
Authors: Stephanie A Lee-Felker; Ely R Felker; Nelly Tan; Daniel J A Margolis; Jonathan R Young; James Sayre; Steven S Raman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Jonathan R Young; Daniel Margolis; Steven Sauk; Allan J Pantuck; James Sayre; Steven S Raman Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Kohei Sasaguri; Naoki Takahashi; Daniel Gomez-Cardona; Shuai Leng; Grant D Schmit; Rickey E Carter; Bradley C Leibovich; Akira Kawashima Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Phillip M Pierorazio; Elias S Hyams; Salina Tsai; Zhaoyong Feng; Bruce J Trock; Jeffrey K Mullins; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman; Mohamad E Allaf Journal: Urology Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 2.649