Literature DB >> 36085372

Cutaneous silent period modulation by tooth clenching, tonic and phasic limb movements in healthy subjects.

Uygur Tanrıverdi1, Ayşegül Gündüz2, Meral E Kızıltan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the modulation of the cutaneous silent period (CSP) by tooth clenching and contralateral tonic dorsiflexion of lower limb and phasic voluntary movements of upper limb.
METHODS: In 18 healthy subjects, we recorded CSP on right thenar muscle after painful stimulation of index finger during mild contraction at six conditions: baseline, maximum tooth clenching, contralateral tonic dorsiflexion of foot, as well as at the beginning (RT1), in the middle (RT2) and at last part (RT3) of the contralateral phasic wrist extension. We measured latency and duration and calculated suppression indices.
RESULTS: During tooth clenching, the suppression index of second inhibitory phase (I2) was significantly higher than that at baseline condition. The suppression index of first inhibitory phase (I1) was reduced in tonic dorsiflexion. The I2 durations in RT2 and RT3 were longer than that at baseline. The I2 suppression indices during RT1, RT2, and RT3 were significantly higher than that at baseline condition (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The tooth clenching has an inhibitory effect on CSP. The contralateral phasic hand movements caused higher suppression index. The CSP is modulated by remote influences differently depending on the type of muscle contraction (tonic vs. phasic) and/or where it is realized (tooth, upper or lower limb).
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cutaneous silent period; Phasic wrist extension; Tonic ankle dorsiflexion; Tooth clenching

Year:  2022        PMID: 36085372     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-022-06455-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  27 in total

1.  Voluntary teeth clenching facilitates human motor system excitability.

Authors:  B Boroojerdi; F Battaglia; W Muellbacher; L G Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Remote effects of self-paced teeth clenching on the excitability of hand motor area.

Authors:  Toshiaki Furubayashi; Kenichi Sugawara; Tatsuya Kasai; Akito Hayashi; Ritsuko Hanajima; Yasushi Shiio; Nobue Kobayashi Iwata; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Changes in segmental and motor cortical output with contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Janet L Taylor; Nicolas T Petersen; Gabrielle Russell; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Conduction velocity in proximal and distal portions of forelimb axons in the baboon.

Authors:  J F Clough; D Kernell; C G Phillips
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Modulation of spinal inhibitory reflex responses to cutaneous nociceptive stimuli during upper limb movement.

Authors:  Romildo Don; Francesco Pierelli; Alberto Ranavolo; Mariano Serrao; Massimiliano Mangone; Marco Paoloni; Angelo Cacchio; Giorgio Sandrini; Valter Santilli
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and H-reflexes are not equally sensitive to voluntary motor commands.

Authors:  T Kasai; Y Toyoda; S Yahagi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Modulation of the excitatory phase following the cutaneous silent period by vibration.

Authors:  Ayşegül Gündüz; Selahattin Ayas; Markus Kofler; Şenay Aydın; Meral Erdemir Kızıltan
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Corticospinal excitability is lower during rhythmic arm movement than during tonic contraction.

Authors:  Timothy J Carroll; Evan R L Baldwin; David F Collins; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Jendrassik maneuver facilitates soleus H-reflex without change in average soleus motoneuron pool membrane potential.

Authors:  R Dowman; J R Wolpaw
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Standardization of the Jendrassik maneuver in Achilles tendon tap reflex.

Authors:  Lale A Ertuglu; Ilhan Karacan; Gizem Yilmaz; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2017-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.