Literature DB >> 3608508

Optimal restricted two-stage designs.

L D Case, T M Morgan, C E Davis.   

Abstract

The fixed sample p value at the final stage of a group sequential design may be "significant" while the overall p value for the trial as designed may be "nonsignificant." This can lead to confusion in reporting and interpreting final stage results. Two-stage designs are presented that allow acceptance, rejection, or continuation at the first stage while retaining the fixed sample critical value at the second stage. The designs are optimized under this restriction to minimize the expected sample size under the null hypothesis, the expected sample size under a specific alternative hypothesis, or the maximum expected sample size. These restricted designs are almost fully efficient when compared to optimal unrestricted two-stage designs. Additionally, one can interpret the results of hypothesis tests at the final stage as though a fixed sample design had been used. Examples are given which illustrate the use of these restricted plans in the design and analysis of clinical trials.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3608508     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(87)90039-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  2 in total

1.  Duration of accrual and follow-up for two-stage clinical trials.

Authors:  L D Case; T M Morgan
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls.

Authors:  Peter Bauer; Frank Bretz; Vladimir Dragalin; Franz König; Gernot Wassmer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.