Literature DB >> 36083563

Approach to glaucoma diagnosis and prediction based on multiparameter neural network.

Qi Li1,2,3, Ningli Wang4, Zhicheng Liu1,2, Lin Li1,2, Zhicheng Liu1,2, Xiaoxue Long1,2, Hongyu Yang1,2, Hongfang Song5,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of comprehensive factor analysis on the relationship between glaucoma assessment and combined parameters including trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD) and fractional pressure reserve (FPR).
METHODS: The clinical data of 1029 patients with 15 indicators from the medical records of Beijing Tongren Hospital and 600 cases with 1322 indicators from Beijing Eye Research were collected. The doc2vec method was used to vectorize. The multivariate imputation by chained equations (MICE) method was used to interpolate. The original data combined with TLCPD, combined with FPR, and not combined parameters were respectively applied to train the neural network based on VGG16 and autoencoder to predict glaucoma and to evaluate the effect of combined parameters.
RESULTS: The accuracy rates used to classify the glaucoma of the two sets reach over 0.90, and the precision rates reach 0.70 and 0.80 respectively. After using TLCPD and FPR for the autoencoder method, the accuracy rates are both close to 1.0, and the precision rates are 0.90 and 0.70 respectively.
CONCLUSION: Using the combined parameters of FPR and TLCPD can effectively improve the diagnosis and prediction of glaucoma. Compared with TLCPD, FPR is more suitable for improving the effect of neural network for glaucoma classification.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided diagnosis; Fractional pressure reserve; Glaucoma; Neural network; Trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference

Year:  2022        PMID: 36083563     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02485-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.029


  9 in total

1.  A Comment on "Juvenile-onset Normal Tension Glaucoma From Chronic, Recurrent Low Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure." J Glaucoma. 2016;25: e738-e740.

Authors:  Pasquale Gallina; Alfonso Savastano; Eleonora Becattini; Simone Orlandini; Stanislao Rizzo; Berardino Porfirio
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 3.  Intracranial pressure and glaucoma.

Authors:  Jost B Jonas; Diya Yang; Ningli Wang
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2013 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Multiple imputation with multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) package.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-01

5.  Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies.

Authors:  M Cristina Leske; Suh-Yuh Wu; Anselm Hennis; Robert Honkanen; Barbara Nemesure
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  CNNs for automatic glaucoma assessment using fundus images: an extensive validation.

Authors:  Andres Diaz-Pinto; Sandra Morales; Valery Naranjo; Thomas Köhler; Jose M Mossi; Amparo Navea
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 7.  Application of machine learning in ophthalmic imaging modalities.

Authors:  Yan Tong; Wei Lu; Yue Yu; Yin Shen
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-04-16

8.  Trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference and open-angle glaucoma. The central India eye and medical study.

Authors:  Jost B Jonas; Vinay Nangia; Ningli Wang; Karishma Bhate; Prabhat Nangia; Purna Nangia; Diya Yang; Xiaobin Xie; Songhomitra Panda-Jonas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.