Literature DB >> 36083415

Open preperitoneal vs. open anterior repair for the treatment of emergency femoral hernia: a bicentric retrospective study.

V Rodrigues-Gonçalves1, M Verdaguer2, A Bravo-Salva3, M Moratal2, R Blanco2, F Ochoa-Segarra3, J A Pereira-Rodríguez3, M López-Cano2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the postoperative results, in terms of complications and recurrence, between the anterior and open preperitoneal approaches in emergency femoral hernia.
METHODS: This bi-centric retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent emergency femoral hernia repair between January 2010 and December 2018. Postoperative complications and recurrence were analyzed comparing anterior and open preperitoneal approaches. The predictors of complications, mortality and recurrence were investigated using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULTS: A total of 204 patients met the inclusion criteria. Open anterior approach was performed in 128 (62.7%) patients and open preperitoneal was performed in 76 (37.3%). Open preperitoneal approach was associated with lower rates of recurrence (P = 0.033) and associated midline laparotomies (P = 0.006). Multivariable analysis identified patients with chronic nephropathy (OR, 3.801; 95%CI, 1.034-13.974; P = 0.044), preoperative bowel obstruction (OR, 2.376; 95%CI, 1.118-5.047; P = 0.024) and required midline laparotomy (OR, 12.467; 95%CI, 11.392-102.372; P = 0.030) as risk factors for complications and ASA ≥ III (OR, 7.820; 95%CI, 1.279-47.804; P = 0.026), COPD (OR, 5.064; 95%CI, 1.188-21.585; P = 0.028), necrotic contents (OR, 36.968; 95%CI, 4.640-294.543; P = 0.001), and required midline laparotomy (OR, 11.047; 95%CI, 1.943-62.809; P = 0.007). as risk factors for 90-day mortality. Male gender (OR, 4.718; 95%CI, 1.668-13.347; P = 0.003) and anterior approach (OR, 5.292; 95%CI, 1.114-25.149; P = 0.036) were risk factors for recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Open preperitoneal approach may be superior to anterior approach in the emergency setting because it can avoid the morbidity of associated midline laparotomies, with a lower long-term recurrence rate.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral hernia repair; Incarcerated; Prosthetic mesh repair; Strangulated

Year:  2022        PMID: 36083415     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02673-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   2.920


  21 in total

1.  The contributions of Usher and others to the elimination of tension from groin herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Raymond C Read
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Emergency femoral hernia repair: 13-year retrospective comparison of the three classical open surgical approaches.

Authors:  C F Chia; W H Chan; K W Yau; Cko Chan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  The therapeutic efficacy of critical care units from two perspectives: a traditional cohort approach vs a new case-control methodology.

Authors:  M E Charlson; F L Sax
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Prognostic significance of mast cell count following curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shou-Wang Cai; Shi-Zhong Yang; Jie Gao; Ke Pan; Ji-Ye Chen; Yu-Lan Wang; Li-Xin Wei; Jia-Hong Dong
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  The comparison of preperitoneal and Lichtenstein repair for incarcerated groin hernias: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Oguzhan Karatepe; Gokhan Adas; Muharrem Battal; Osman Bilgin Gulcicek; Yücel Polat; Merih Altiok; Servet Karahan
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 6.071

6.  Primary prevascular and retropsoas hernias: incidence of rare abdominal wall hernias.

Authors:  B S Powell; N Lytle; N Stoikes; D Webb; G Voeller
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Emergency femoral hernia repair: a study based on a national register.

Authors:  Ursula Dahlstrand; Staffan Wollert; Pär Nordin; Gabriel Sandblom; Ulf Gunnarsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  TW-SIR: time-window based SIR for COVID-19 forecasts.

Authors:  Zhifang Liao; Peng Lan; Zhining Liao; Yan Zhang; Shengzong Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.

Authors:  Eric I Benchimol; Liam Smeeth; Astrid Guttmann; Katie Harron; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Erik von Elm; Sinéad M Langan
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Population-based study of presentation and adverse outcomes after femoral hernia surgery.

Authors:  D J Humes; R S Radcliffe; C Camm; J West
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.