Zhao-Xuan Lu1, Heng-Le Wei2, Yadong Shi1, Hao Huang1, Haobo Su1, Liang Chen1. 1. Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 385685Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. 2. Department of Radiology, 579164The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigates the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatments on pregnancy-related iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 46 patients who had symptomatic pregnancy-related iliofemoral DVT and underwent endovascular treatment. The patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) were classified as the CDT group. In contrast, those treated with CDT combined with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) or angioplasty/stenting were classified as the pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) group. Results: Based on the immediate post-operative clot burden reduction rate analysis of 46 patients: 22 cases were completely dissolved (lysis grades III), 12 were partially dissolved (lysis grades II), and 12 failed (lysis grades I). There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of clot burden reduction between the CDT group (n = 19) and the PCDT group (n = 27) (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bleeding events between the two groups (p = 0.989). At 24 months, cumulative venous patency in the CDT group was 50.0%, compared to 78.2% in the PCDT group. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference in Villalta score (p = 0.001) and venous severity scoring (VCSS score) (p = 0.005) between the two groups. Conclusions: CDT treatment combined with PMT or angioplasty/stenting is comparatively safe and effective for pregnant-related DVT patients. PCDT outperforms CDT in terms of immediate efficacy and reduces the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome with better midterm outcomes.
Objective: This study investigates the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatments on pregnancy-related iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 46 patients who had symptomatic pregnancy-related iliofemoral DVT and underwent endovascular treatment. The patients treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) were classified as the CDT group. In contrast, those treated with CDT combined with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) or angioplasty/stenting were classified as the pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) group. Results: Based on the immediate post-operative clot burden reduction rate analysis of 46 patients: 22 cases were completely dissolved (lysis grades III), 12 were partially dissolved (lysis grades II), and 12 failed (lysis grades I). There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of clot burden reduction between the CDT group (n = 19) and the PCDT group (n = 27) (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of bleeding events between the two groups (p = 0.989). At 24 months, cumulative venous patency in the CDT group was 50.0%, compared to 78.2% in the PCDT group. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference in Villalta score (p = 0.001) and venous severity scoring (VCSS score) (p = 0.005) between the two groups. Conclusions: CDT treatment combined with PMT or angioplasty/stenting is comparatively safe and effective for pregnant-related DVT patients. PCDT outperforms CDT in terms of immediate efficacy and reduces the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome with better midterm outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
catheter-directed thrombolysis; deep vein thrombosis; pharmacomechanical thrombectomy; pregnancy-related
Authors: Katalin Lestak; Anna Louise Pouncey; Adam Gwozdz; Justinas Silickas; Leslie Fiengo; Oscar Johnson; Alberto Smith; Prakash Saha; Beverley Hunt; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Susan Robinson; Karen Breen; Stephen Black Journal: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord Date: 2019-12-24
Authors: Wee-Shian Chan; Evelyne Rey; Nancy E Kent; Wee-Shian Chan; Nancy E Kent; Evelyne Rey; Thomas Corbett; Michèle David; M Joanne Douglas; Paul S Gibson; Laura Magee; Marc Rodger; Reginald E Smith Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Can Date: 2014-06
Authors: Mark H Meissner; Peter Gloviczki; Anthony J Comerota; Michael C Dalsing; Bo G Eklof; David L Gillespie; Joann M Lohr; Robert B McLafferty; M Hassan Murad; Frank Padberg; Peter Pappas; Joseph D Raffetto; Thomas W Wakefield Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Yong Sun Jeon; Yong Han Yoon; Joung Ym Cho; Wan Ki Baek; Kwang Ho Kim; Kee Chun Hong; Joung Taek Kim Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2010-02-12 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Leonid A Parunov; Natalia P Soshitova; Mikhail V Ovanesov; Mikhail A Panteleev; Ilya I Serebriyskiy Journal: Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today Date: 2015-09-25
Authors: Susan R Kahn; Ian Shrier; Jim A Julian; Thierry Ducruet; Louise Arsenault; Marie-José Miron; Andre Roussin; Sylvie Desmarais; France Joyal; Jeannine Kassis; Susan Solymoss; Louis Desjardins; Donna L Lamping; Mira Johri; Jeffrey S Ginsberg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 25.391