| Literature DB >> 3608266 |
E M Veys, H Mielants, G Verbruggen.
Abstract
In the present study, 345 rheumatoid arthritis patients were treated using goldsalts, D-Penicillamine or levamisole as the slow-acting antirheumatic drug of first choice. Goldsalts were given to 182 patients, levamisole to 139 and D-Penicillamine to 24. At the time of the present evaluation, 83 patients were still on goldsalts (44.6%), 63 on levamisole (45.2%) and 11 on D-Penicillamine (45.9%). Adverse reactions required interruption of treatment in 64 patients on goldsalts (35.2%), in 44 on levamisole (31.7%) and in 5 on D-Penicillamine (20.8%). Inefficacy was responsible for withdrawal of 33 patients receiving goldsalts (18.1%), 30 receiving levamisole (21.6%) and 8 receiving D-Penicillamine (33.3%). The duration of treatment was 4.6 years for goldsalts, 3.6 years for levamisole and 3.6 years for D-Penicillamine. In the present analysis none of the compounds was found to have a definite advantage over the others. The rather favourable treatment continuation rates in this study can be attributed to the fact that the slow-acting antirheumatic drugs were given at an early stage of the disease, preferably before the occurrence of radiological lesions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1987 PMID: 3608266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol ISSN: 0392-856X Impact factor: 4.473