Literature DB >> 36082365

Cost Effective Method for gDNA Isolation from the Cecal Content and High Yield Procedure for RNA Isolation from the Colonic Tissue of Mice.

Sohini Mukhopadhyay1,2, Palok Aich1,2.   

Abstract

Microbiome studies are quickly gaining momentum. Since most of the resident microbes (consisting of bacteria, fungi, and viruses) are difficult to culture, sequencing the microbial genome is the method of choice to characterize them. It is therefore important to have efficient methodology for gDNA isolation of gut microbes. Mouse models are widely used to understand human disease etiology while avoiding human ethics-related complications. However, the widely used kit-based methods are costly, and sometimes yields (in terms of quality and quantity) are sub-optimal. To overcome this problem, we developed a straightforward, standardized DNA isolation procedure from mouse cecal content for further microbiome-related studies. The reagents we used to standardize the procedure are readily available even in a not-so-well-equipped laboratory, and the reagents are not expensive. The yield and quality of the DNA are also better than those obtained by the readily available kit-based methods. Additionally, we modified the kit-based method of RNA isolation from the colon tissue sample of the mouse for better yield. Churning the tissue with liquid nitrogen at the beginning of the procedure improves RNA quality and quantity. Graphical abstract.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors; exclusive licensee Bio-protocol LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cecal DNA ; Colonic tissue ; Cost-effective ; DNA isolation ; DNA isolation by lysis ; High yield ; RNA isolation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36082365      PMCID: PMC9411013          DOI: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bio Protoc        ISSN: 2331-8325


  9 in total

1.  Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction affects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis.

Authors:  Martin Iain Bahl; Anders Bergström; Tine Rask Licht
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Transkingdom control of microbiota diurnal oscillations promotes metabolic homeostasis.

Authors:  Christoph A Thaiss; David Zeevi; Maayan Levy; Gili Zilberman-Schapira; Jotham Suez; Anouk C Tengeler; Lior Abramson; Meirav N Katz; Tal Korem; Niv Zmora; Yael Kuperman; Inbal Biton; Shlomit Gilad; Alon Harmelin; Hagit Shapiro; Zamir Halpern; Eran Segal; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Comparison of seven methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from fecal and cecal samples of mice.

Authors:  Janina Ferrand; Kevin Patron; Christine Legrand-Frossi; Jean-Pol Frippiat; Christophe Merlin; Corentine Alauzet; Alain Lozniewski
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.363

4.  Microbiota transplantation from younger to older mice could restore lost immunity to effectively clear salmonella infection in Th2-biased BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Salila Pradhan; Pratikshya Ray; Palok Aich
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.037

5.  Probiotics L. acidophilus and B. clausii Modulate Gut Microbiota in Th1- and Th2-Biased Mice to Ameliorate Salmonella Typhimurium-Induced Diarrhea.

Authors:  Biswaranjan Pradhan; Dipanjan Guha; Aman Kumar Naik; Arka Banerjee; Subodh Tambat; Saurabh Chawla; Shantibhusan Senapati; Palok Aich
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies.

Authors:  J Paul Brooks; David J Edwards; Michael D Harwich; Maria C Rivera; Jennifer M Fettweis; Myrna G Serrano; Robert A Reris; Nihar U Sheth; Bernice Huang; Philippe Girerd; Jerome F Strauss; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gregory A Buck
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  An Improved Method for High Quality Metagenomics DNA Extraction from Human and Environmental Samples.

Authors:  Satyabrata Bag; Bipasa Saha; Ojasvi Mehta; D Anbumani; Naveen Kumar; Mayanka Dayal; Archana Pant; Pawan Kumar; Shruti Saxena; Kristine H Allin; Torben Hansen; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Henrik Vestergaard; Oluf Pedersen; Verima Pereira; Philip Abraham; Reva Tripathi; Nitya Wadhwa; Shinjini Bhatnagar; Visvanathan Gnana Prakash; Venkatesan Radha; R M Anjana; V Mohan; Kiyoshi Takeda; Takashi Kurakawa; G Balakrish Nair; Bhabatosh Das
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of five assays for DNA extraction from bacterial cells in human faecal samples.

Authors:  T Gryp; G Glorieux; M Joossens; M Vaneechoutte
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Stool sampling and DNA isolation kits affect DNA quality and bacterial composition following 16S rRNA gene sequencing using MiSeq Illumina platform.

Authors:  Petra Videnska; Kristyna Smerkova; Barbora Zwinsova; Vlad Popovici; Lenka Micenkova; Karel Sedlar; Eva Budinska
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.