| Literature DB >> 36082353 |
Abstract
In the context of global science and technology, all countries pay more and more attention to the text analysis of emotional intonation, and the emotional intonation text analysis and policy orientation of enterprise management in major international and domestic enterprises have also changed from shallow to deep. In the twenty-first century, with the rapid development of human society, people's demand for living standards and material needs increases rapidly, and employees' awareness and needs for work are constantly changing. At present, there is the problem of emotional intonation text analysis error in the management of the enterprise, and the task and emotional transmission command are not clear and thorough. It is necessary to reasonably use deep-learning-related algorithms, especially convolutional neural network and other algorithms, to study the emotional intonation text analysis and policy guidance of the enterprise management. Aiming at the forefront of deep learning development, the latest deep learning technologies are constantly introduced. The research field of emotional intonation text analysis and policy orientation of enterprise management is focused. Through simulation experiment, the characteristics of emotional intonation text analysis and policy orientation research of different enterprise management are compared and analyzed, so as to further improve the emotional intonation text analysis and policy orientation of deep learning for enterprise management.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36082353 PMCID: PMC9448572 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3428078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Experimental environment and configuration.
| Experimental environment | Configuration information |
|---|---|
| Operating system | Windows10 (64 bit) |
| Processor | Intel® Core™ i7-4790, 3.6 GHz |
| Internal storage | 16 GB |
| Programming language | Python 3.6 |
| Deep learning framework | TensorFlow 1.13 |
| Partition tool | Jieba, PkuSeg |
Figure 1The comprehensive happiness questionnaire.
Description of the sample situation.
| Demographic variables | Encoding | Class | Number of people | Percentage (%) | Cumulative percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0 | Man | 158 | 66.7 | 66.7 |
| 1 | Woman | 79 | 33.3 | 100 | |
|
| |||||
| Education level | 1 | Specialist below | 18 | 7.6 | 7.6 |
| 2 | Junior college education | 53 | 22.4 | 30 | |
| 3 | Undergraduate course | 149 | 62.9 | 92.8 | |
| 4 | Master's degree or above | 17 | 7.2 | 100 | |
|
| |||||
| Working life | 1 | 1–3 Years | 26 | 11 | 11 |
| 2 | 3–5 Years | 107 | 45.1 | 56.1 | |
| 3 | 5–10 Years | 69 | 29.1 | 85.25 | |
| 4 | More than 10 years | 35 | 14.8 | 100 | |
|
| |||||
| Position | 1 | Grassroots management personnel | 62 | 26.1 | 26.1 |
| 2 | Middle management | 142 | 59.9 | 86.1 | |
| 3 | Senior management staff | 33 | 13.9 | 100 | |
Figure 2Distribution of the happiness index.
Figure 3Mean average of each dimension of happiness.
Figure 4Bar chart of the average value of all dimensions of psychological authorization.
Figure 5Bar chart of the mean of each dimension.