| Literature DB >> 36082292 |
Yang Sun1,2, Yan Li1,3, Wen Zhang1, Bin Jiang1, Si-Min Tao1, Han-Yang Dai2, Xin-Tong Xu1, Yue-Xin Sun1, Lei Yang2, Yong-Jun Zhang3.
Abstract
The (E)-β-farnesene (EβF) is one of the most important secondary metabolites in some plants and provides indirect defense against aphids. However, the direct effect of EβF against pests is still unclear. In this study, various concentrations of EβF (0.16, 0.8, and 4 g/kg) were provided in an artificial diet to determine the direct effects of EβF on Spodoptera exigua. The results showed that an artificial diet containing 4 g/kg of EβF reduced the final survival of the S. exigua larvae and per female fecundity of adults significantly when compared with CK and SC controls (p < 0.05), then ultimately it also significantly affected the intrinsic rate of increase (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the results of the EβF bioassay in an artificial diet also indicated that the proliferation of the S. exigua population was inhibited by the ingestion of EβF in a dose-dependent manner. Combined differential RNA-seq data and RT-qPCR analysis, it was found that four key genes involved in juvenile hormone degradation significantly upregulated in S. exigua larvae treated by EβF at a dose of 0.8 and 4 g/kg when compared with two controls (p < 0.05). This indicated that EβF could disturb the normal function of juvenile hormones and reduce the survival rate of S. exigua larvae. Additionally, two key genes that regulate per fecundity of S. exigua females, including SeVg and SeVgR, were significantly downregulated in adult females (p < 0.05) when they were treated with 0.8 and 4 g/kg of EβF at the larval stage, relative to the expression of these genes after treatment with controls. These findings suggested that EβF first disturbed the normal function of juvenile hormone by upregulating key degradation genes, and then inhibited the expression of SeVg/SeVgR genes and proteins, thus reducing the population size of S. exigua by increasing larval mortality and inhibiting per female fecundity.Entities:
Keywords: (E)-β-farnesene; RNA-seq; SeVg and SeVgR; Spodoptera exigua; reproduction and oviposition
Year: 2022 PMID: 36082292 PMCID: PMC9445801 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.863626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
The key life-history parameters of S. exigua larvae under different doses of EβF.
| Key life history parameters of | Different treatments | ||||
|
| |||||
| Controls | Different doses of Eβ F | ||||
|
|
| ||||
| CK | SC | 0.16 g/kg | 0.8 g/kg | 4 g/kg | |
| Total mortality of larvae at 1st and 2nd instars (%) | 4.38 ± 0.87c | 3.33 ± 1.36c | 5.00 ± 1.71c | 11.67 ± 4.38b | 28.33 ± 6.18a |
| Larvae mortality of 3rd instar (%) | 1.46 ± 0.93a | 1.04 ± 0.74a | 1.67 ± 1.58a | 2.08 ± 1.65a | 2.71 ± 0.94a |
| Larvae mortality of 4th instar (%) | 1.88 ± 1.36a | 2.29 ± 1.36a | 1.87 ± 0.87a | 1.46 ± 1.19a | 2.50 ± 1.19a |
| Ultimate larvae mortality (%) | 14.17 ± 1.58c | 17.50 ± 2.00c | 19.17 ± 2.72c | 36.67 ± 5.02b | 54.75 ± 7.10a |
| Larval stage (d) | 12.64 ± 1.64a | 12.78 ± 1.94a | 13.13 ± 1.92a | 13.55 ± 2.52a | 14.12 ± 3.08a |
| The whole life-span of | 31.19 ± 3.02a | 31.37 ± 3.04a | 31.65 ± 3.37a | 32.79 ± 4.30a | 34.43 ± 6.04a |
| Adult emergence rate (%) | 78.25 ± 9.98a | 79.11 ± 7.93a | 74.66 ± 8.71a | 72.70 ± 8.77a | 70.52 ± 8.15a |
| Per female fecundity | 512.40 ± 57.67a | 504.80 ± 45.86a | 464.20 ± 62.01a | 370.00 ± 54.19b | 155.40 ± 32.11c |
| Hatching rate of eggs (%) | 68.47 ± 7.14a | 67.11 ± 6.92a | 66.60 ± 7.68a | 63.38 ± 6.79a | 57.98 ± 6.89a |
| Intrinsic rate of increase (R) | 0.154 ± 0.018a | 0.151 ± 0.012a | 0.144 ± 0.017a | 0.122 ± 0.019b | 0.079 ± 0.012c |
CK (blank control) and SC (solvent control) were set as controls. The concentrations of EβF treatments were set as 0.16, 0.8, and 4 g/kg; the units of g/kg in all treatment groups mean the mass ratio of EβF/artificial diet. Data are presented by mean ± standard error; different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference obtained by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
Sequences of RT-qPCR primers used in this study.
| Gene | Upstream primer(5′-3′) | Downstream primer (5′-3′) | Tm (°C) | Product size (bp) |
|
| 5′-GCATACCAGCCAACTACCAAAT-3′ | 5′-TGCACCTGACACTGTCTACCCT-3′ | 60°C | 149 |
|
| 5′-GAAGGGAGGGAAGTGTCCTGAG-3′ | 5′-TGATGGTGAAAGAAACGCTGTG-3′ | 60°C | 104 |
|
| 5′-CCAGCCTTCCTTCTTGGGTAT-3′ | 5′-AGGTCCTTACGGATGTCAACG-3′ | 60°C | 94 |
| Unigene026066 | 5′-AGTTTGATGAAGCGATGA-3′ | 5′-TTAGTCTTGAAATGAGGGA-3′ | 50°C | 199 |
| Unigene025818 | 5′-ATCCCAACCACAGCACCAG-3′ | 5′-AATGCCCTCCATCATCCAG-3′ | 58°C | 127 |
| Unigene025841 | 5′-GCAATGGGTTTGGCTACT-3′ | 5′-TTTGTTGGCTGGGTCTGT-3′ | 54°C | 232 |
| Unigene024849 | 5′-TATGGGTTTATGTGCTTAGA-3′ | 5′-GTAGAACTGATGTGGCTCC-3′ | 50°C | 163 |
| Unigene022385 | 5′-GTATTAGCGAGGGAAACA-3′ | 5′-ACCAATCTGAGCAGCACT-3′ | 53°C | 201 |
| Unigene029506 | 5′-TGATGATGCTGGCTGAGAT-3′ | 5′-GAGGCTGGTGAAACAACTG-3′ | 60°C | 286 |
| Unigene029881 | 5′-CCCCGTCAGCAAGGTGG-3′ | 5′-CGTTGGCGTTGAATCCG-3′ | 60°C | 214 |
| Unigene029782 | 5′-GCCCACCCCAAATACGA-3′ | 5′-GTCAGCCTCCACCAGCG-3′ | 57°C | 123 |
| Unigene024091 | 5′-GTTGATGGGTGATTTGG-3′ | 5′-TACACTGGGTTGGTCGT-3′ | 50°C | 105 |
| Unigene024366 | 5′-GGAGTGTAAACAGAAGGGAGTC-3′ | 5′-GCTGGTCGCTGATGAAGA-3′ | 54°C | 162 |
FIGURE 1The mixed graphs showed the relative expression level of all differentially expressed unigenes in S. exigua larvae after EβF treatments at doses of 4 g/kg. (A) The volcano plot obtained from the DESeq2 analysis between 4 g/kg EβF treatments and CK (blank control) samples showing log2 (fold-change) and-Log10 FDR values. (B) The volcano plot obtained from DESeq2 analysis between 4 g/kg EβF treatments and SC (solvent control) samples showing log2 (foldchange) and-Log10 FDR values. (C) The numbers of DEGs among different treatments among CK, SC, and 4 g/kg EβF treatment. The concentrations of EβF treatments were set as 4 g/kg; the unit of EβF treatment as g/kg means the mass ratio of EβF/artificial diet. The value denotes the value of log2 (FPKM + 1).
FIGURE 2The heat map showed the relative expression level of all differentially expressed juvenile hormone-related unigenes in S. exigua larvae after EβF treatments at doses of 4 g/kg. CK (blank control) and SC (solvent control) were set as controls. The concentrations of EβF treatments were set as 4 g/kg; the units of EβF treatment as g/kg in all treatment groups mean the mass ratio of EβF/artificial diet. The value denotes the value of log2 (FPKM + 1). The unigenes for further study using the RT-qPCR were marked with red font.
FIGURE 3The relative expression of the identified random ten unigenes explored by differential RNA-seq in S. exigua larvae after EβF treatments at different doses. (A) The relative expression of six upregulated unigenes in S. exigua after EβF treatments at different doses. (B) The relative expression of four downregulated unigenes in S. exigua after EβF treatments at different doses. CK (blank control) and SC (solvent control) were set as controls. The concentrations of EβF treatments were set as 0.16, 0.8, and 4 g/kg; the units of g/kg in all treatment groups mean the mass ratio of EβF/artificial diet. Different lower-case letters indicated a significant difference determined by performing ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 4The relative expression of SeVg and SeVgR genes in female adults of S. exigua after EβF treatments at different doses. CK (blank control) and SC (solvent control) were set as controls. The concentrations of EβF treatments were set as 0.16, 0.8, and 4 g/kg; the units of g/kg in all treatment groups means the mass ratio of EβF/artificial diet. Different lower-case letters indicated a significant difference determined by performing ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 5The Western blot assay showed the relative expressions of SeVg and SeVgR proteins in female adults of S. exigua after EβF treatments at different doses. (A) The Western blot pictures of SeVg and SeVgR proteins in female adults of S. exigua after EβF treatments at different doses. (B,C) The relative expressions of SeVg and SeVgR protein expressions by calculating the grayscale value ratios of SeVg/β-actin and SeVgR/β-actin with different treatments. CK (blank control) and SC (solvent control) were set as controls. The concentrations of EβF treatments were set as 0.16, 0.8, and 4 g/kg; the units of g/kg in all treatment groups mean the mass ratio of EβF/artificial diet. Different lower-case letters indicated a significant difference determined by performing ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05).
The linear correlations between respective key life parameters and SeVgR/SeVg expression in S. exigua after treatment.
| Key life parameters (y) | Expression and other parameters (x) | Linear equation |
|
|
|
|
| Per female fecundity (y) | The expression of | y = 614.358x–99.833 | 0.953 | 0.0045 | 60.215 | 37.406 |
| The expression of | y = 663.605x–145.490 | 0.999 | 0.0001 | 2507.210 | 5.936 | |
| Hatching rate of eggs (%) (y) | The expression of | y = 17.216x + 50.663 | 0.938 | 0.0067 | 45.465 | 1.206 |
| The expression of | y = 18.671x + 49.322 | 0.992 | 0.0003 | 356.107 | 0.443 | |
| Intrinsic rate of increase (y) | The expression of | y = 0.129x + 0.025 | 0.952 | 0.0045 | 59.663 | 0.008 |
| The expression of | y = 0.139x + 0.016 | 0.998 | 0.0001 | 2300.883 | 0.001 | |
| Per female fecundity (y) | Hatching rate of eggs (%) (x) | y = 35.184x–1875.302 | 0.987 | 0.0006 | 228.106 | 19.564 |
| Intrinsic rate of increase (x) | y = 4773.543x–219.2 | 0.999 | 0.0001 | 2897.987 | 5.522 | |
| Hatching rate of eggs (%) (y) | Intrinsic rate of increase (x) | y = 134.340x + 47.244 | 0.992 | 0.0003 | 385.646 | 0.426 |
| The expression of SeVg (y) | The expression of | y = 1.024x–0.028 | 0.943 | 0.0059 | 48.94 | 0.065 |
Data are mean ± standard error; different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference obtained by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s HSD test (“*” means p < 0.05).